Dedication
For every victim, for my guardian angel and her children, and for my sister, my rock.
Before You Begin
Author's note: This book reflects my own experiences and memories. Names and identifying details of the people in it have been changed or left out to protect their privacy. Nothing in this book is intended to diagnose any individual. This book is for information and support. It is not medical, psychological, or legal advice, and it is not a substitute for a doctor, therapist, attorney, or domestic violence advocate who knows your situation.
© 2026 Jane Doe. All rights reserved.
If you are in danger right now, put this book down and call the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 1-800-799-7233, or text START to 88788. Everything in these pages will still be here when you're safe.
If you're safe enough to keep reading, I want you to know three things before we start. You are not alone. You are not crazy. And you can get out. It is hard, it usually takes more than one try, and you will need a plan. This book is here to give you the tools I wish someone had handed me decades ago.
And I'm going to use the word abuse, plainly and often. For years I couldn't say it. I called it a rough patch, a toxic relationship, two people who brought out the worst in each other. Those soft words kept me in. If someone controls you, frightens you, lies to you, isolates you, takes your money, hurts your body, or forces sex on you, that is abuse. Calling it by its name is the first step out. Some of what follows may be triggering, so go at your own pace and put the book down when you need to.
A note on pronouns: I'm also going to use the word he. Statistically, most perpetrators of partner abuse are men, so that's the pronoun I chose. In your life, it may not be. The patterns are what matter, whoever is using them against you.
A note on who this book is for
Abuse happens to men, too, and it happens in LGBTQ+ relationships. If that's you, your experience is real, many of the patterns in these pages will apply, and the National Domestic Violence Hotline is there for you, too. The numbers matter. Men's violence against women is the most common and the most deadly form of partner abuse. Women are far more likely to be seriously injured or killed by a partner, as the numbers in the next few pages will show you. This book is for the women living inside those numbers.
This isn't about hating men. I love men. It's about protecting women from bad men.
I'm not writing as an expert who studied this from the outside. I'm writing as the woman it happened to, again and again, who then spent a lifetime reading everything she could find to understand why. Where the research says something clearly, I'll tell you and show you where it comes from. Where it's still debated, I'll say that too. And where all I have is my own experience, I'll tell you that's what it is. You deserve the truth, all of it.
Start Here
You don't have to read this book in order. Start where you are.
- If you're in danger right now, call 1-800-799-7233 or text START to 88788, then read Chapter 27: Lethality Indicators.
- If you're confused and wondering whether it's really abuse, read Signs of Abuse at a Glance and take the Am I Trauma Bonded? checklist.
- If you're planning to leave, go to Part VII: Getting Out.
- If you've left and you're trying to heal, go to Part VIII: Rebuilding.
- If you want to understand why this keeps happening to you, start at the beginning.
Introduction: You Are Not Alone
You may have picked up this book because someone handed it to you, or because you typed a question into your phone at two in the morning that you couldn't ask out loud. Maybe it was Why does he do that? Maybe it was Is this abuse? Or maybe it was the question someone else asked you, the one that stings every time: Why didn't you just leave?
I want to be clear from the first page. That question sounds simple, and it isn't. Leaving a man like this means walking away from someone your body is bonded to, often with less money, fewer friends, and more danger than anyone on the outside can see. And underneath it is the question you've probably been asking yourself: Why me? Asking that isn't blaming yourself. The shame belongs to the person who chose to hurt you. But if you've been through this more than once, if every relationship somehow turns into the same nightmare with a different face, it's one of the most important questions you can ask. Not what did I do to deserve this, but what made me a target, and how do I stop being one?
Here's the short answer, and the rest of this book is the long one. You stop being a target in four ways. You heal the original wound, so danger stops feeling like home. You learn discernment, so you see the signs in the first weeks, not the fifth year. You build boundaries that hold, so his tests stop working. And you learn your red and green flags before you need them. None of this means it was your job to prevent what he did. It means you get your power back.
My whole life, I seemed to attract men who lied, cheated, and took advantage of me. Five long-term relationships, and the same story every time. When I write about "him," I mean all of them; the patterns were the same. I was that target. I've spent years trying to figure out this pattern and why I felt so stuck. I kept asking myself, Why am I attracting these types of men? Why did I stay? Why did I keep finding the same person in a different body? That's why I wrote this book.
One thing needs to be clear before we go any further. Being targeted because of your vulnerabilities is never the same as being responsible for the abuse. The only person responsible for abuse is the person doing it. I have disorganized attachment, which means the people I needed for safety as a child were also the people I feared, and complex PTSD, the kind of trauma that comes from years of harm instead of one event. I am an empath, an over-functioner, and an intellectualizer who spent her whole life trying to understand the psychology of the men who hurt her instead of simply leaving them. I have the photographs, the police reports, and five therapists who all called it abuse. And I've learned that leaving is a process, and it might not stick the first time. But it can be done, especially with a plan and someone safe in your corner, like an advocate.
There are plenty of books about why he does it. There are almost none that ask, without blame, who he was looking for and why she stays. That's the book I needed. So I wrote it.
This is common, and the shame is his
If you feel like the only one, look at these numbers. You are in enormous company.
| What the research shows | Source |
|---|---|
| About 1 in 3 women worldwide (31.6%, roughly 840 million) has experienced physical or sexual partner violence, non-partner sexual violence, or both | World Health Organization, 2023 estimates |
| Almost half of U.S. women (47.3%) have experienced contact sexual violence, physical violence, or stalking by an intimate partner | CDC NISVS 2016/2017, via NSVRC |
| 45.1% of U.S. women have experienced contact sexual violence in their lifetime; 21% report completed or attempted rape | CDC NISVS 2023/2024, via VAWnet |
| About 1 in 4 U.S. women has experienced severe physical violence by a partner | CDC |
| 8 out of 10 rapes are committed by someone the victim knows | RAINN |
| Nearly 1 in 10 U.S. women has been raped by an intimate partner | CDC NISVS 2010, via NSVRC |
| Most victims knew the person who hurt them; it was rarely a stranger | CDC |
Read that last line again. Most of us were hurt by someone we knew, often someone we loved.
Now flip those numbers around, because this is what stopped me cold. If nearly one in three women has been hurt this way, then a lot of men are doing the hurting. Forget the stranger lurking in an alley. These men are our coworkers, our neighbors, our pastors, the friendly guy at the bar, and, more often than anyone wants to admit, our own family members. Some of them hurt more than one woman. They live ordinary lives, and most people around them have no idea.
The most dangerous man is the one in your house
For women, the number one threat isn't a stranger. It's the man she lives with. In 2024, about 83,000 women and girls around the world were intentionally killed, and 60% of them, roughly 50,000, were killed by an intimate partner or family member. That's one every ten minutes. For men, it's the opposite. Only 11% of male homicide victims were killed by a partner or relative. In the Americas and Europe, most of these killings of women are committed by intimate partners: 69% in the Americas and 64% in Europe. The United Nations put it bluntly. The home, it said, remains a dangerous and sometimes lethal place for too many women and girls (UNODC and UN Women, Femicides in 2024: Global Estimates of Intimate Partner/Family Member Femicides, 2025).
We teach girls to fear strangers in parking lots. We should be teaching them the signs of the man who says he loves them.
That means you almost certainly know someone who is being abused right now, and someone who is doing it. Learn the signs, and check in on the women in your life. A simple Are you safe? can open a door.
So let's put the shame where it belongs. Abuse and sexual assault are decisions the perpetrator makes. For too long, women have been asked the wrong questions: Why didn't you leave? What did you do? Why were you drinking? Why did you go back? I want us to start asking the right ones. Why did he do it? Who knew? Who protected him?
Shame keeps us silent, and silence protects the men who hurt us. Every time you say it out loud, you hand the shame back to him, where it always belonged.
Part I: The Type
He told me he'd noticed me long before we ever spoke, and he could still describe exactly what I was wearing. I didn't think anything of it. I just thought, wow. It took me years to hear it for what it was. He'd been watching me, studying me, long before I knew he was interested. He wasn't falling for me. He was choosing me. He was profiling me. If you've ever wondered why you, start here. Men like this don't stumble into you. They hunt.
Before we can understand why we stay, we have to understand why we were chosen. This part is about the woman he was looking for, and what he was hoping to get from her.
Chapter 1: They Are Hunting
I used to think it was bad luck. Then I started to wonder why the bad luck always looked the same.
The question in this book's title, Why didn't you just leave?, puts the whole weight on her. The better questions are Why did he choose her?, What did he do to keep her?, and What made leaving so dangerous and so hard? That's what this book answers.
What I eventually learned is that predators read vulnerability fast. In one study, people scoring higher on psychopathic traits were better at picking out who would be an easy target just from watching short clips of strangers walking, and they often couldn't even explain how they knew (Wheeler, Book and Costello, 2009). A follow-up with prison inmates found the same thing. The more manipulative and callous the man, the more accurately he read vulnerability (Book, Costello and Camilleri, 2013).
He sensed who you were before you said a word. That isn't your fault. But it is information, and information is power.
They find you when you're vulnerable
Predators don't only look for a type. They look for a moment. Research keeps finding that risk climbs during the seasons when a woman is most stretched:
- After a move. Women who had recently moved had nearly double the risk of partner violence, from a past partner or a new one (Waltermaurer, McNutt and Mattingly, 2006, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health).
- When you're young. Women ages 18 to 34 have generally had the highest rates of partner violence (Bureau of Justice Statistics).
- During pregnancy and after a baby. Pregnant and postpartum women had a 16% higher homicide rate than other women their age, and about 70% of those killings involved a gun (Wallace et al., 2021, Obstetrics & Gynecology).
- With a disability. Women with a disability are significantly more likely to experience every form of partner violence the CDC measures, from physical and sexual violence to stalking and control over their reproductive health (Breiding and Armour, 2015, Annals of Epidemiology).
- Under financial strain. In research funded by the National Institute of Justice, couples under heavy financial strain had partner violence rates of 9.5%, compared with 2.7% for couples under little strain, and the rate climbed with each stretch a man was out of work (NIJ).
- After a loss. A divorce, a death, a breakup, a lonely stretch. Federal investigators warn that romance scammers deliberately target people who were recently widowed or divorced (Homeland Security Investigations), and abusers read the same openings.
- After earlier abuse. As Chapter 5 shows, childhood abuse is one of the strongest predictors of being abused again.
None of this makes it your fault. It means those seasons are when you most need to slow down, keep your people close, and let a new man earn his place.
Psychologist Martha Stout, who taught at Harvard Medical School and spent decades studying people without a conscience, estimates that about 1 in 25 people is a sociopath. In The Sociopath Next Door, she says they often carry a kind of glow or charisma that makes them more interesting than everyone else in the room. And she says the single best clue is the pity play, more than the charm: the sad story, the hard childhood, the tears that make a kind woman want to help (Stout, The Sociopath Next Door, 2005). Her advice is to suspect flattery and beware the pity play. I wish I had read that at twenty. The men who hurt me always had a story that made me want to save them.
The perfect version, built for you
It took me decades to understand this about that charisma. A man without a conscience doesn't care what he says, whether it's true, or who he has to become to get what he wants. Lying costs him nothing. So he studies you and then becomes your perfect match. He loves the music you love, wants the life you want, and finishes your sentences. He tells you he's never felt this way before. What he's really building is a mirror, and you're falling for your own reflection.
Looking back, I can hear the script. Remember the man from the start of this part, who could still tell me what I was wearing the first time he saw me? What I left out is that at the time, I was dating his friend. What sounded romantic was something else. He'd been watching me, stalking me really, while I was with someone else, and he knew exactly who I was long before I knew anything about him.
And listen to his words, because he will tell you who he is. They always tell on themselves.
So here's the rule I wish I had lived by. If it seems too good, too fast, it almost always is. Real people take time to know. Real love can survive you slowing down. If he can't wait, that's your answer.
It isn't about you
The man bold enough to walk up to you at a bar, slide into your messages, or pick you out of a crowd may feel like he saw something special in you. Maybe he did. But he may be doing the exact same thing to every woman in the room. Confidence with strangers proves nothing about connection; it can just as easily be practice. For predators, approaching women is a numbers game. Cast a wide net, and keep the ones who respond.
I learned this the hard way. When I finally looked at his phone, it was full of women, some of them on hidden social media accounts. Many of them he'd met through his kids' extracurricular activities. I wasn't chosen because I was one of a kind. I was chosen because I said yes.
So when a stranger comes on strong, enjoy the compliment if you want, but don't mistake boldness for sincerity. Watch how he treats the waitress, the bartender, and the other women around you. Watch whether he's still interested when you slow things down. Someone who's interested in you will still be there next week, and he won't need to win you over tonight.
Hiding in plain sight
We picture predators as obvious, the creepy guy, the angry drunk. Sometimes they are. But many of them are the most trusted people in the room: the pastor reading the Sunday sermon, the coach, the youth leader, the boss, the man who volunteers for everything, the soft-spoken one who cries in all the right places. Martha Stout writes about a gentle, charming sociopath who looked like the nicest man you'd ever meet. Not all of them are loud. Some come across as sensitive and spiritual. They're very good at sounding wise.
Positions of trust give predators exactly what they need: access, credibility, and cover. And institutions too often protect them. In 2022, an independent investigation of the Southern Baptist Convention, the largest Protestant denomination in America, found that survivors who reported abuse were ignored, disbelieved, or vilified for nearly two decades, while two leaders quietly kept a private list of hundreds of accused ministers. When that list was finally released, it had more than 700 entries (AP via KCTV5; Verus).
Most pastors, coaches, and leaders are not abusers. But a title is not proof of safety, and charm is not proof of character. They are everywhere. They are hiding in plain sight. And remember, they can see you, often before you see them.
I'm going to describe a type, the one I know from the inside because I am her. It isn't the only type, and if you don't see yourself here, your experience is just as real. But if you do recognize yourself, keep reading. This book was written for you.
Chapter 2: Portrait of the Type
She's a fixer or an empath. She feels what other people feel, sometimes before they do, and she gives endless benefit of the doubt.
She's an over-functioner. She's conscientious and capable, so when he drops something, she picks it up without thinking. In personality research, conscientiousness means being organized, dependable, and responsible. I score very high on it, which makes me great at my job and, in the wrong relationship, the perfect person to carry everything.
She's highly sensitive. Psychologist Elaine Aron coined the term "highly sensitive person" (HSP) for the roughly 15 to 20% of people born with a nervous system that processes everything more deeply: moods, tones, faces, noise, the energy in a room (Aron, The Highly Sensitive Person, 1996). It's a temperament, not a disorder, and it can be a gift. Highly sensitive people are often empathic and intuitive. Many are also highly conscientious.
She's also hypervigilant. That's different. Hypervigilance isn't something you're born with; it's something trauma teaches you. Years of danger trained her to scan every room and every mood for the first sign of trouble, and from the outside that looks like devotion.
When a woman is both, like I am, she reads people almost instantly. She knows he's upset before he walks in the door. She adjusts her tone and her plans, even her face, to keep the peace, often without realizing she's doing it. To an abuser, that's priceless. He never has to say what he wants; she's already sensed it and delivered. And when he wants to hurt her, he knows she'll feel every cold silence and every eye-roll ten times harder than most people would.
Her attachment is often disorganized, though it can be anxious or another insecure style. Fear and love got wired together early, so danger doesn't feel like danger. It feels like home.
She's capable. She has a stable home, an income, and competence. What he wants isn't only what she has. It's what she is.
And there's one more kind of woman I've never seen described in the books, the one I know best. I call her the Analyst. She is smart, educated, often successful in her career. When her partner lies, rages, or disappears into a bar for the third weekend in a row, she doesn't leave. She intellectualizes. She researches, because if she can understand the why, maybe it will explain everything.
She reads about his diagnoses, his childhood, and his father's temper. She learns the vocabulary of trauma and attachment. She goes to the couples counselor and the communication class. Every explanation feels like a key, and every key promises that if she just understands him well enough, she can unlock the man she believes is inside. What she doesn't see is that her intelligence has become the lock. As long as there's one more theory to test, she never has to admit what the evidence already shows. I did this kind of analysis for a living. But a man with no intention of changing isn't an open ticket. He's a closed case she keeps reopening.
I was the Analyst for decades. I could diagnose him in my sleep. I could not diagnose myself. The turning point came when I stopped asking why is he like this and started asking why am I still here. His reasons were never going to set me free. Mine might.
How the Type Gets in Her Own Way
Everything above is true. You were chosen for your strengths. But if we stop there, we've answered half the question. The other half is harder to read, and I'm going to say it plainly, because no one was ever plain with me and I lost years to that.
The same traits that made you a target also kept you there. This isn't blame. He chose the behavior; he is responsible for it. But you cannot change what he does. You can only change what you do with what you see. So let's look at what you do.
The Capable One won't let anyone carry her
Of all these traits, this is the one that runs the others. You learned early that needing people was risky, so you became someone who doesn't. You handle it. You always have. Hyper-independence looks like strength from the outside, and you've been praised for it your whole life. But it means no one sees how heavy things have become, because you never let them get close enough to see. To a man who isolates his partner, a woman who already refuses help has done half his work for him.
The Intellectualizer understands instead of feeling
You can explain his childhood, his patterns, the psychology behind his rage. You can explain your own wiring too. Understanding feels like progress, but it often isn't. You can know exactly why something hurts and still not let yourself feel how much it hurts. Insight becomes a place to hide. Your body, meanwhile, keeps its own record: the stomach that drops when his car pulls in, the jaw you clench in your sleep, the exhaustion no amount of rest fixes. Your body knew before your mind would admit it.
The Parentified woman confuses caretaking with love
If you grew up managing an adult's emotions, keeping the peace, or being the responsible one long before you should have been, then being needed feels like being loved. A man who needs rescuing feels familiar. A man who doesn't need you that way may feel flat, even boring. Your attraction is real, but it was calibrated in a house where love and chaos arrived together. It is not a reliable guide on its own.
The Overthinker replaces action with analysis
You replay conversations. You rewrite texts six times. You weigh every possible meaning of what he said. All of that thinking feels like work toward a solution, but it often runs in a loop that keeps you exactly where you are. Meanwhile, he moves freely, because he isn't thinking about it at all.
The Comedian turns pain into a punchline
If you're funny, you know how this works. You tell the worst story of your week as a funny story, everyone laughs, and no one asks the follow-up question. Humor got many of us through childhood. It still works as a pressure valve. But when every hard thing becomes a comedy bit, the people who could help you never hear how serious it is. Sometimes you don't either.
What the types share
Underneath all of them is one habit. You trust your research over your own read. You knew. Most of us did, early. The first time he lied and the story didn't add up. The first time his anger didn't match the moment. We noticed, and then we went looking for a reason why what we noticed might be wrong.
Two other patterns travel with that habit:
- Shame makes you hide. You protect the image of the relationship and handle it alone. If you're used to being the capable one, asking for help feels like failure. That isolation is exactly what he needs.
- The pattern repeats. If you've had more than one relationship with the same features, such as lying, substance use, or infidelity, that is not bad luck. It's data. In my work, a recurring incident gets a post-mortem, not another patch. Your relationships deserve the same.
Hope is the hook
You fall in love with who he could be and accept promises as partial payment. Chapter 18 is about exactly this, and Is He Really Changing? in Your Toolkit shows what real change looks like. In the meantime, accept him as he is right now, because that is who you are actually living with.
Why this matters
None of this means you deserved what happened. It means you have something he doesn't, the ability to look at your own part honestly and change it. He chose you for who you are. Knowing how that same person keeps the door open is how you learn to close it, and how you recognize the next one before he gets inside.
Chapter 3: Why He Needs Her
He outsources the regulation of his moods. He needs someone to absorb his chaos and regulate his emotions for him, because he can't do it himself. He needs someone with integrity, because his gaslighting, making you doubt your own memory, only works on a woman who cares about the truth. And he needs someone stable, because she makes his life look functional from the outside. Your best qualities were never flaws, and they're exactly what he was looking for.
Now look at what he brings to the table, because it's the other half of the match.
He needs fixing
Under the charm, he's often immature and impulsive, chasing the next hit of excitement: a new woman, a new truck, a night out, a new high. Robert Hare's psychopathy checklist names some of this directly: need for stimulation, impulsivity, irresponsibility, and no realistic long-term goals (PMC). To a woman like me, all that chaos looked like a project. I could organize him, steady him, help him become the man he kept promising to be.
Something comes before you
So many of these men have a drinking or drug problem, and I've come to believe something simple about it: if you love something more than you can love me, that's addiction. It might be alcohol, weed, pills, porn, or the next woman on his phone. Whatever it is, you will always come second to it. Addiction doesn't cause abuse; plenty of people struggle with substances without hurting their partners. But it fuels the lying, the disappearing, the money problems, and the rage, and it means he is never fully present with you.
He lives off you
Psychopathy researchers have a term for this pattern, a parasitic lifestyle, though I'm describing what I lived, not diagnosing anyone. With good pay he still never seemed to have money, so somehow I was the one paying (Chapter 12 has the list). He lived with constant financial instability; I had a home, savings, and good credit. What he wants starts with what you have.
He wants a mother, not a partner
Some of these men are trying to heal their own childhood wounds through you. They want you to clean up after them, manage their moods, make their appointments, and forgive them over and over, the way a mother forgives a child. You become his caretaker. And like a child, he resents the mother he depends on. He doesn't want to be held accountable. He wants to be left alone with his video games, his drinking, and his childish behavior. So the moment you ask him to act like an adult, you remind him of his mother, and he resents you for it.
He may hate you because he wants to be you
This one took me the longest to see. The same competence and stability that drew him to you, along with your confidence, can become the thing he can't stand. Your success reminds him of his failures. So he tears you down, calls you "bossy," "judgmental," or "cold," and tries to make you smaller so he can feel bigger. In my experience, envy sits underneath a lot of that contempt.
What does he love, and what does he need to feel big?
Pay attention to what he's fanatical about, because it shows you what feeds his ego. For some men, it's their image, their job title, or their reputation as the nice guy. For mine, it was drinking, drugs, and never being told what to do. Look at what he can't live without. That's usually what he'll protect at your expense.
Is his ego fragile?
From the outside, a fragile ego looks strong, loud, certain, always right. Underneath, it can't survive a correction. A suggestion feels like an attack. A question feels like an accusation. A capable woman feels like a threat.
What does he need you to be?
This may be the most revealing question of all. Abusers don't want a partner. They want a role filled. Mine needed me to be his audience, his caretaker, his bank, and his silent passenger. I was never supposed to say anything about his driving, his drinking, his spending, or his lies. His father had even told me that when his son was doing something, I just needed to let him do it. The role came with a script, and my lines were: agree, admire, pay, and stay quiet. The moment I spoke up, I was a psycho.
Some of these men have diagnosable personality disorders, and Chapter 25 covers what the research says. But you don't need a diagnosis to see the pattern. Ask yourself: what role am I playing, and what happens when I step out of it?
Put those halves together and you can see why the match works, for a while. She needs to be needed, and he needs a caretaker. She fixes, and he needs fixing. She gives, and he takes. It feels like fate. It's a setup.
Strip away the charm, and this is who he is, an immature, insecure, manipulative, and exploitative man who wants power and control over you. You'll find the whole profile in one place in the Toolkit: His Profile at a Glance.
Part II: The Original Bond
I grew up feeling like a burden next to my mother's relationships. She chose alcohol and drugs over her child, and I think she was addicted to those relationships, too. Complex trauma is rarely one bad event. More often it's a constant cycle of abuse, neglect, and no attunement, repeated over years by the people who were supposed to keep you safe. The World Health Organization recognizes complex PTSD as a distinct condition that can follow exactly this kind of prolonged, inescapable trauma, especially in childhood. A child in that cycle learns to read moods before she has words for them, to stay small, and to expect nothing. That skill keeps her safe growing up. As an adult, it makes her the perfect match for a man whose moods run the house. If walking on eggshells feels normal to you, this part explains why.
The abuse didn't start with him. For many of us, the blueprint was drawn in childhood, which is why danger can feel like love, and why your body may have recognized him long before your mind did.
Chapter 4: Fright Without Solution
Researchers Mary Main and Erik Hesse described disorganized attachment with three words that hit me hard when I first read them: fright without solution. When the person a child depends on for comfort is also the person she's afraid of, her body is told to run toward them and away from them at the same time. A child can't solve that, so she learns to live inside it. She freezes, she fawns (pleasing and placating to stay safe), she reads every mood in the house. And she learns that protesting is dangerous, because protest might cost her the person she needs to survive.
That child grows up. In adulthood, fright without solution looks like reaching for the person who just hurt you. It looks like feeling desperate to fix things with him minutes after he screamed at you. It looks like pushing a kind person away because closeness feels risky, then chasing the man who keeps you off balance. It looks like a mind that knows he's dangerous and a body that won't let go.
If that was your childhood, of course you didn't protest when he crossed your first boundary. You were following the rules that kept you alive. Nothing about that makes you weak or foolish. It makes you a survivor whose survival skills were built for a different danger, at a different time. The work now is teaching your body that you're not that little girl anymore, and that you're allowed to leave.
Chapter 5: Trauma in the Nervous System
When I finally read the research on revictimization, I cried, because it described my life. Women abused in childhood are more likely to be abused by partners as adults. In a 2024 meta-analysis of 22 studies, childhood abuse was the factor most strongly linked to being abused again, ahead of alcohol and drug use, recent violence, and PTSD symptoms (Bellot et al., 2024, Behavioral Sciences). The authors note that research on revictimization is still limited, but the pattern was consistent. It's hard to accept that because you were treated badly as a child, you're more likely to be treated badly as an adult. It feels unfair. But more likely doesn't mean destined. And abuse in childhood includes watching it happen to your mother; Chapter 31 covers what that does to children.
Psychiatrist Judith Herman first proposed complex PTSD in Trauma and Recovery (1992), after seeing that prolonged, repeated trauma, the kind you can't escape, marks a person more deeply than a single terrible event. Complex PTSD lives in the body. Your nervous system learned to scan for danger constantly, to read faces, tones, and silences. That hypervigilance can look like deep attunement, and abusers love it, because it means you'll manage their moods before they even have to show them. When danger hits, you may fight, run, freeze, or fawn: placating, agreeing, apologizing, doing anything to make it stop. Fawning is the response abusers find most useful, and it's the one many of us learned first. Therapist Pete Walker, who added fawn to the familiar fight, flight, and freeze, describes it as seeking safety by merging with the wishes and needs of others (Walker, Complex PTSD: From Surviving to Thriving, 2013). A woman in fawn is nice, too nice. She keeps everything to herself and never speaks up. Quiet, complicit behavior is exactly what he wants.
Know which state you're in
Your nervous system may stay on alert long after the danger has passed, and living there isn't healthy. Learning to name your state is the first step out of it:
- Fight: irritable, defensive, ready to argue, jaw and fists tight.
- Flight: anxious, restless, busy, can't sit still, planning your escape from every room.
- Freeze: numb, foggy, stuck, unable to decide or even speak.
- Fawn: agreeing to things you don't want, apologizing for things that aren't your fault, staying silent to keep the peace.
When you notice it, name it: I'm in fawn right now. Then use the regulation tools in Chapter 16 to bring your body back to safety.
Walker also describes emotional flashbacks, sudden waves of old childhood fear or shame that flood you in the present, often without any picture or memory attached. A raised voice, a cold silence, or a fight with a family member can drop you straight back into feeling small. Naming that helps too: This is a flashback. I'm not in danger now. For Walker, recovery runs through grief, for what happened and for what you never got, and through shrinking the inner critic that learned to blame you.
Your nervous system is also why calm partners can feel boring and chaotic ones exciting. Drama and chaos can feel like chemistry at first. So can intensity. None of them is. The spike of adrenaline when he's unpredictable feels like attraction. The quiet of a safe person feels like nothing is happening. Nothing in your nervous system is broken. It stays loyal to what it learned first, and it can learn something new.
Chapter 6: The Reunion
Freud called it repetition compulsion, recreating an old wound in the hope of a different ending. If I can make this man stay, soften, and love me well, it will finally prove I was lovable all along.
I'll be honest with you. This is an influential clinical idea, not settled science. But I know what it felt like from the inside. Every man was a chance to rewrite my childhood. When he withdrew, I worked harder, the way I worked harder as a little girl to earn love that never came reliably. When he exploded, part of me felt terror and part of me felt strangely at home. I didn't know how to be loved calmly. I only knew how to earn love under pressure.
That's why the abusive ones felt like chemistry and the kind ones felt like nothing. My body recognized the abuse as familiar, and familiar feels normal, even when it's the opposite of safe.
The trauma bond, the attachment that forms when the same person both hurts you and comforts you, wasn't a mistake I kept making. It was a reunion I kept attending. No man can give you the ending you wanted as a child. The way out is grieving that you didn't get it, and then giving yourself what that child needed: an escape, the right to say no, boundaries, the truth, and safety.
Psychologist Alice Miller wrote that sensitive children tune in to a parent's needs so closely that they lose touch with their own, and that parents often deny what happened. Healing, she argued, means letting yourself feel the grief and the anger of the childhood you actually had, instead of protecting the parent from it (Miller, The Drama of the Gifted Child). Your anger at the people who failed you is part of healing, not a failure of it.
Yin and yang: your family story and his
Therapist Harville Hendrix built a whole approach to couples therapy, Imago, on the idea that we're unconsciously drawn to partners who resemble the people who raised us, both their love and their wounds. Whether or not you buy all of his theory, I found one piece of it painfully true. Our two family stories fit together like puzzle pieces. Psychotherapist Ross Rosenberg calls this the human magnet syndrome. In his book of the same name, he describes how people who learned to give, fix, and accommodate are pulled toward people who learned to take, like opposite poles of a magnet. He describes the two sides as other-oriented people, who focus on everyone else's needs, and self-oriented people, who focus on their own. It feels like chemistry. It's actually two childhood wounds recognizing each other. And that's the trap. The fixer's whole sense of worth depends on repairing someone, and the man she's drawn to is the one man who can't be fixed. If you want to understand your own attachment style first, try the free Attachment Style Quiz based on psychologist Chris Fraley's ECR-RS, or read about the full research version, the ECR-R. There's more under More Self-Assessments in Your Toolkit.
Put simply, I dated my mother, and he dated his dad in me.
My mother was a teen mom who was still partying. My father was around until I was three. He was a wild man: horses, the rodeo, guns. He put a shotgun in my hands when I was about three years old. His strict, religious parents called me the bastard child. When I was at their house, they hid from me, as if I were some kind of pariah. I was a little kid.
Then my mother moved us hours away from her family, my grandparents, and everyone who had been our support system, to live with a man who was abusive to her. I was four, in preschool. I remember telling the other kids I was going to kick the window and go back to my grandmother's house. And I did. I kicked a glass window. My mother didn't know how to comfort me. She was mad, because it was going to cost money. I remember getting stitches while I was awake, with a book held in front of my face so I wouldn't look. Years later I found a photo of myself on my grandmother's lap at school. I thought it was cute. Then I turned it over and saw my age written on the back. I was four. You can't see the bandages in the picture, but I know they were on my leg. Looking at it again, I could see how stressed my grandmother looked.
When I started school there, my mother's ex-boyfriend drove a brown van back and forth past the playground, trying to get me to come to him. I still remember running to tell the school he was there, and sitting outside with my teacher. Those years, the window and the van, were the start of my complex PTSD. My mother denied the van ever happened. God forbid what he might have done to me.
My mother never came to PTA meetings or anything else to do with school. I played sports my whole life, and she came to about two games. My grandparents told me that if I played sports, they'd buy me shoes. So I played every sport. I think that's where I learned achievement.
She would leave me home alone for long stretches, sometimes weeks, with no food. I'd call my grandparents, and they used to say I was hungry every time I got in the car. I was. When I was only a toddler, one morning there was no milk for cereal, so I tried to make an egg and dropped it on the floor. My mother was in bed, hungover. I knew she'd be livid when she woke up, and I didn't know how to clean it up, so I hid under the table between the chairs. I learned to read moods before I had words for them.
She could put a Band-Aid on a scratch. But when she combed my hair, she ripped it out. I remember asking why it hurt so much when she did it and never when Grandma did. I know the answer now. My grandmother cared whether it hurt me. My mother didn't. My mother wasn't really my mother. I don't believe she had the capacity to attune to or empathize with anyone. That part of her just seemed to be missing, and her boyfriends always came first.
Psychologist Jonice Webb calls this childhood emotional neglect, and it's defined by what didn't happen. No one noticed what you felt, comforted you, or asked and cared about the answer (Webb, Running on Empty, 2012). Adults raised this way often feel unseen, struggle to name their own needs, and rely on themselves far too much. That was me. Whatever emotional footing I had, I got from my grandmother. She gave me what my mother couldn't.
Eventually, I moved in with my grandparents, and they became my legal guardians. With them, I became a straight-A student with a plan for college.
My grandmother was my safe person. She was loving and funny, she listened to everything I said, and I never felt judged. She was like a best friend. Researchers at Harvard's Center on the Developing Child have found that the most common factor in children who develop resilience is at least one stable, committed relationship with a supportive adult (Harvard Graduate School of Education). She was that person for me, and I believe she's a big part of why I'm still standing.
Even my safe place had a crack in it. My grandfather flirted constantly with waitresses, and when I said it was disrespectful, my grandmother said he just thought he'd get better service. She didn't have a job of her own. She had to stay with him, so she kept quiet. When he died, I think part of her missed him and part of her was free.
So this is what I learned about love growing up. The person who's supposed to take care of you might not. You take care of the grown-ups instead. You earn love by achieving. And women stay quiet because they can't afford not to.
I've come to see one more role I played in my family. I was the truth teller, the truth seeker. I may have started as the black sheep and turned into the scapegoat. Family-systems writers like Sharon Wegscheider-Cruse describe roles children take on in troubled families, such as the hero, the lost child, and the scapegoat, the one who gets blamed for the family's problems (Wegscheider-Cruse, Another Chance, 1981). My family cares about each other, I believe that, but it isn't safe. They talk behind each other's backs, there's a lot of codependency, where people manage each other's feelings instead of their own, and it's okay to judge you and put you in a box. In families like that, the truth teller becomes the problem, because nobody wants to be held accountable. They'd rather sweep it under the rug, because looking at the problem would mean having to resolve it. So many women who end up with narcissistic partners tell me the same story. They were the scapegoat, because they were the ones who saw the system.
Therapist Rebecca Mandeville, who coined the term family scapegoating abuse, describes how the role tends to fall on the most sensitive or truthful member, the one who names what's happening. The scapegoat's story gets told and retold by others until the whole family believes it. Her key point is that the role is about the system, not about you. Healing means grieving, building your own story, and no longer seeking the family's validation (Mandeville, Rejected, Shamed, and Blamed, 2020).
Most of us didn't learn boundaries growing up. We learned to read the room, manage the adult, absorb the mood, and fix what we didn't break. Some of us were raising our parents before we were old enough to drive. Clinicians call this parentification. We called it being mature. Clinical psychologist Lindsay Gibson describes how children of emotionally immature parents often take on adult-level responsibility to make up for a parent's behavior (Gibson, Adult Children of Emotionally Immature Parents, 2015). She calls the sensitive ones internalizers. They blame themselves, take care of everyone, and assume the problem must be them. Those children grow into women with a very specific set of skills: a high tolerance for chaos, a reflex to fix, and a habit of putting their own needs last. Those skills kept us safe as children. They're also exactly what an abuser screens for.
I was the parentified daughter, and for most of my life I carried a parentified guilt toward my mother. I watched her moods, parented her, and over-functioned to keep everyone happy. Then I grew up and kept ending up with men who needed me to do it all over again. Therapist Susan Forward describes several kinds of mothers who can't love their daughters well, and one is the mother who needs mothering, where the roles reverse and the daughter becomes the caretaker (Forward, Mothers Who Can't Love, 2013). That's the role I played with my mother. Forward's advice is to stop absorbing the guilt, set firm boundaries, and speak calmly without getting drawn back into arguing about what happened.
This next truth is harder than any of us want it to be. If your family of origin carried trauma, they likely don't have the tools to help you heal from it. I don't say that as an accusation; it's a limit, and you can't heal inside the system that taught you the pattern. You need outside, objective help: a therapist, an advocate, a support group, a domestic violence organization in your area. There's a list in Where to Talk, at the back of the book.
You can be sympathetic about where you came from. You can't be sympathetic about where you stay.
His story I pieced together over years. His family learned to keep the peace by lying and by letting him have his way. Remember what his father told me, back in Chapter 3. When his son was doing something, I just needed to let him do it. In their house, lying to avoid conflict counted as survival. I've seen the same thing in my own family. I believe that when you're abused as a child, you learn you have to lie to save yourself, and then the lying gets you punished too. It's a no-win situation, and some children grow into adults who never stop lying. So when a capable woman corrected him, questioned him, or asked for the truth, he didn't see a partner. He saw the father he'd spent his childhood managing, and he fought back the only ways he knew: lies, stonewalling (shutting down and refusing to engage), and rage.
That's the yin and yang of a trauma bond. Each person's wound fits perfectly into the other's. I knew how to earn love from someone who withheld it. He knew how to withhold. I was used to managing someone's moods. He was used to having his moods managed. It felt like we understood each other on some deep level, and in a way we did. We were both reenacting childhoods we never chose.
So ask yourself: What was love like in the house you grew up in? Who did you have to be to stay safe? What do you know about his family, and who did he have to be? And who might you each be playing for the other?
Chapter 7: Same Story, Different Bodies
I said at the beginning that this happened to me again and again. I meant that literally. I've had five long-term relationships and several shorter ones. I was engaged to four of those men, and I married one of them on an out-of-town trip where marriage was never the plan. He pushed until I said yes, and Chapter 21 explains why that was coercive control, not a whim. Every long-term relationship involved lying, substance abuse, and cheating.
In high school, I dated one genuinely kind boy. He was loving and caring, he listened without judging me, he wanted me around his friends, and he didn't lie or cheat. I sometimes think he was the one, but I was too young to know how rare that was. And I wasn't wired to want it. The kind, steady men seemed boring and vanilla to me. There was no chemistry. My nervous system didn't recognize safety as love.
My first abusive relationship started when I was about twenty. My fiancé lit up every room he walked into. He was smart and outgoing, and whatever I said I wanted to do, he said he'd always wanted to do that, too, and jumped on the bandwagon. Behind the scenes, he was cruel. He drank, and he preferred porn to me; once he waited for me to leave the house so he could be alone with it. Another time, jealous about another guy, he got angry in the car, slammed it into reverse, and crashed, then blamed me, though I wasn't even driving. He cheated through college. Women called our house asking for him while I wore his ring. The night before a friend's wedding I was in, he disappeared and slept with the bride's cousin. He came home in a cab at seven in the morning, told me he'd fallen asleep on a curb in the parking lot, and I still had to stand up in that wedding the next day. When I called out his lies, he made me feel insecure, jealous, and crazy. His friends even learned that if they wanted him to do something, I couldn't be the one to suggest it, because if it was my idea, he wouldn't go. That was his control.
The worst moment came at the end, at a dinner where I thought we might finally talk things through. He showed up late. He'd already told his best friend he was leaving to move across the country with another woman, and not just any woman: his best friend's girlfriend, and he barely had the guts to tell me. I ended up crying with his best friend, the one person who told me the truth. After we broke up, his friends told me they were relieved I was out, that he'd been lying and cheating the whole time and hitting on everyone's girlfriends. He had zero boundaries, and everywhere was a hunting ground. Some of those same friends had treated me like the crazy one while we were together. I lost friends because of him, and I stopped wanting to date for a long time. I know now that I was infatuated with him, and he never loved me. A love made out of infatuation is intensity without safety, and that is not love.
His mother gave me the best advice I've ever gotten. She told me he was just like his father. Love is not supposed to hurt, she said. The best revenge is happiness and success, and you deserve that.
Years later, I moved to a small town for a man who didn't care whether I moved. He'd lost his job, ruined his credit, and sold his house, and since the apartments were too small and too expensive for him and his kids, I bought a house. He was drinking. While I was back home visiting my family, he was cheating on me. I found another woman's earrings in my nightstand. He lied so naturally that he seemed to believe his own stories, and at first people found him entertaining. He dated online and picked up women wherever he went. It wasn't one other woman. It was anyone he could get.
More than once, I took years off from dating on purpose, because I knew I had a pattern of attracting liars, cheaters, and abusive men. I was successful early and owned a nice house at twenty-eight, and I was alone. And every time I went back, the pattern was the same. I saw the signs in the first few months, and I stayed. I let them lie. I believed them when they said they were sorry, or that they'd change. They never did.
There were others. One preferred porn to being intimate with me. One misused prescription pills and treated my home as his own. One broke my nose when I took his keys so he wouldn't drive drunk. One drank every night and criticized my every choice. One lied about a weekend away that he spent with his ex, then called me crazy when I found out. And one, who drank and was addicted to porn, tried to stop me from leaving by jumping on my car.
Same story, different bodies. Fake charm and charisma. Insecurity. Lying. Cheating. Addiction. Sexual compulsion. Boundary violations. Most of them needed me for money. Several hid big facts until I was already attached; I didn't learn about one man's children until we were months in. Several were paying child support for children they rarely saw. They were so self-centered that no one, not even their own children, could become the center of their world. That spot was taken. They reminded me of my mother, who once told me, "This is my life, and I'm going to live it the way I want."
The lying sat at the center of it. One small 2005 brain-imaging study at the University of Southern California found that pathological liars had more prefrontal white matter and less gray matter than comparison groups, though it involved only 49 people and the question is far from settled (ScienceDaily). What I can tell you from experience is that men like this rarely lie about just one thing. They keep other women in the wings and their hands in several cookie jars. They aren't only lying to you; they're keeping their options open. And addiction usually goes hand in hand with the lying. When you're that insecure, you numb yourself.
For a long time, I absorbed it, because women are taught to (Chapter 26). And when I noticed, I heard the same words every time: "insecure," "jealous," "crazy," "psycho." Those labels are misogynistic, and they're meant to make you a lesser woman for seeing the truth.
So why did I stay? And why did I marry one of them? That's the question this whole book is trying to answer.
Chapter 8: The Moral Defense
The psychoanalyst Ronald Fairbairn noticed that children of unsafe parents take the badness inside themselves. Believing I am bad is more bearable than believing the person I depend on is dangerous, and no one is coming. At least if I'm the problem, there's something I can fix.
I carried that into every relationship. When he lied, I asked what I'd done to make him feel he couldn't tell me the truth. When he raged, I replayed my tone of voice. When he cheated, I wondered what I lacked. When he got violent, a voice in my head said, Maybe it's both of us. When no one else takes responsibility for anything, someone still has to hold the blame. So I held it. All of it.
Abusers know how to use this. Look what you made me do. You're the crazy one. Those words land so easily on a woman who learned as a child that everything is her fault.
Practice this. When you catch yourself asking what you did wrong, ask a second question. What did he do? Write the answer down, plainly, without softening it. Keep a journal of your truth, your reality, and your instincts, and keep it locked and safe where he can't find it. The moral defense kept you alive as a child. You don't need it to survive anymore.
Part III: The Audition
It started with little asks, small favors framed as friendship. Each one was a test. Would I over-function? Would I over-extend myself? Would I put his needs ahead of my own? I said yes every time. I didn't know I was being tested. Every yes told him I'd carry whatever he handed me, and that my no would bend. He was testing my boundaries, pushing my limits to see whether I'd stay. And when I finally pushed back, out came the apologies and the promises to change. Healthy, mature people don't have to promise change over and over. That's a pattern. Before he takes anything big, he finds out what you'll give for free.
Once he finds the type, he tests her. Almost everything that happened later was visible in the first few weeks, if you know what to look for.
Chapter 9: How the Tests Work
I didn't understand the testing for most of my life, and once I did, I could see my whole history differently. The names below are my own shorthand, but the pattern is one that clinicians who talk about manipulation, including psychologist Ramani Durvasula (Should I Stay or Should I Go?, 2015), describe, and so do thousands of women online.
It starts with the affectionate violation: a boundary crossed with a smile or a compliment, so objecting feels rude. Then the emotion probe: does guilt work on her? Sadness? His anger? He's learning which levers move you. There's information gathering, intrusive questions early on that collect your wounds for later. There's over-extension, small favors that keep growing. There's fast-tracking, rushing so your judgment never catches up to your feelings.
And then there's the first real no. How he reacts the first time you hold a boundary is one of the most revealing moments in the whole relationship. Does he adjust? Or does he sulk, punish, or smear you? That moment tells you everything you need to know.
Mr. Nice Guy and the debt
Not every abuser starts out loud. Some start out nice, almost too nice. He fixes your car, carries your groceries, helps you move, shows up with dinner, does favors you never asked for. It feels like kindness. But it often comes with an invisible contract: I did all this for you, so now you owe me. Therapist Robert Glover, in No More Mr. Nice Guy, calls these "covert contracts": giving in order to get, without ever saying so out loud. When you don't pay up with attention, affection, sex, or loyalty, the nice guy turns resentful, and suddenly you're the ungrateful one. You do not owe this man anything. Nothing at all.
Security expert Gavin de Becker, who has spent his career predicting violence, lists this exact tactic among the warning signs in The Gift of Fear. He calls it loan sharking: giving unsolicited help so the other person feels obligated, then collecting far more than was ever given (de Becker, The Gift of Fear, 1997). His other warning signs read like a map of my relationship. Here they are in plain language, with what each one sounds like:
- Charm and niceness: being charming on purpose, to lower your guard. "But he was so nice."
- Forced teaming: creating a sense of "us" too fast. "We're in this together."
- Too many details: liars pile on details to sound believable. When a simple question gets a long, elaborate story, pay attention. Researchers who study lying have tested one trick. Ask him to tell the story backwards, from the end to the beginning. The truth is easy to retell in any order. A made-up story usually falls apart (lie-detection research by psychologist Aldert Vrij and colleagues).
- Typecasting: he labels you with a small insult so you'll work to prove him wrong. "You're probably too good for a guy like me." Now you're busy proving you're not.
- The unsolicited promise: reassurance you never asked for. "I promise I'll never hurt you." "I swear this time will be different." When a man offers a promise you didn't request, he's trying to convince you of something, and de Becker calls it one of the most reliable signs of trouble.
- Discounting the word "no": refusing to accept your answer. I said I needed time when we met. I said no on our wedding night. Neither "no" mattered to him.
Kindness that keeps a ledger is an investment, and he expects a return.
Chapter 10: My Audition
Looking back, it was all there from the start.
We were friends first. One night he asked me to drive him to a buddy's place where he was crashing on the couch. The buddy turned out to be a woman he was sleeping with, and he had lied to me about it for no reason I could see. He didn't have one woman on the side; he had many, and he had no regard for anyone's circles: my friends, my family, even his kids' activities. It was all a hunting ground. Not long after, when I told him I'd just gotten out of a relationship and needed time, a friend called to warn me that he'd been showing up at the places I frequented, calling me names. I had said no to dating him. That was my first boundary, and the punishment came within a week.
Then came the small asks that grew. Could he borrow a little money until payday? Could I cover his share this month? Could I get the bill just this once? The loans never came back, and his share always came up short. Each one was framed as friendship, and each one tested whether I would over-function for him. By the time I found the hidden accounts and heard the words "jealous," "insecure," and "crazy" for the first time, I had already shown him exactly who I was, a woman who would accommodate.
Chapter 11: Failing the Test on Purpose
I have to be honest about my side of this. Was I insecure? Sometimes, yes. Was I questioning, suspicious, and slow to trust? Absolutely. Some of that I brought in with me from a lifetime of trauma. And a lot of it was a completely reasonable response to a man who was lying to me, but society has conditioned women to accept less. Both things were true at once, and he used the first to hide the second.
What I didn't have were real boundaries. I didn't know how to look a man in the eye and say, No. You're crossing my line, and I'm done. My boundaries were like wet spaghetti noodles. You could throw them at the wall, and they'd just slide right down. I'd say no, then explain, then soften, then give in. He learned fast that my "no" was really "maybe, if you push."
No one is born knowing how to hold a boundary. It's a skill, and like any skill, you can build it. You start with small ones and you hold them. Every time you hold one, it gets a little firmer, until one day it stands on its own.
The skill I had to learn was to respond to the test, not the explanation. When a small boundary gets crossed, the answer is a consequence, not a conversation. You don't owe a man a debate about why you said no.
Say he wants to move in after three weeks of dating. Instead of explaining your schedule, your feelings, and your history, you say, "That's too fast for me." Then you watch. Not his words, his behavior. Does he say "Okay, no rush" and mean it? Or does he sulk, guilt-trip you, go cold, or pull someone else in to take his side and tell you how selfish you are? Survivors call that person a flying monkey (Chapter 23). His response is the test result.
Failing on purpose feels terrible at first, especially if you're an over-functioner. You'll feel guilty, rude, maybe even cruel. That feeling proves nothing about whether you did something wrong. It's your old programming protesting. Hold the boundary anyway.
And watch for the green flag that matters most. He hears a small no and simply adjusts. "I hear you. Your feelings are valid. I'm sorry, and it won't happen again." And it never happens again. No sulking, no guilt trip, no relitigating. That one moment tells you more than months of romance. A man who can't take a small no will never take a big one.
A boundary isn't an ultimatum
An ultimatum is a threat: do this, or else. It leaves him in charge of the outcome and hands him one more chance to decide whether to respect you. A boundary is about what you will do. If you lie to me, I'll leave. And then you leave. You don't announce it three times, negotiate it, or wait to see whether he means it this time. The action that follows is the boundary.
That's why boundaries are hard. Holding one usually means being uncomfortable, and sometimes it means being lonely. You'll want to fill the quiet with him, or with the next him. Don't. Let the discomfort move through you, and turn that time into patience, grace, and care for yourself. A boundary you hold costs you something now. A boundary you drop costs you years.
And boundaries are also about how you treat yourself: respecting your mind and your body, controlling what you can, and letting the rest go. For a plain definition of boundaries, the different kinds, and how to set one, see What a Boundary Is (and Isn't) in Your Toolkit.
Part IV: The Need Audit
"I'll just do it myself." That was my motto. He rarely paid his share, so I covered the difference, again and again. I called it generosity. It wasn't. Being needed made me feel safe, and he knew it. This part sets aside what's wrong with him and asks what need he was meeting in you, so you can stop letting him meet it.
His tests worked on me because the relationship was meeting real needs, ones I'd never named. This part is the hardest and the most freeing. For each need, I'll show you how he met it, what it cost me, and how to meet it safely somewhere else.
Chapter 12: The Need to Be Needed
When you've built your identity on being the capable one, a man who can't manage his own life feels like purpose.
He met that need perfectly. I drove his kids to their activities and paid for their gear. I did the hard work on his rental property while he took the easy parts. I covered rent, trips, gifts, and debts. Every time I rescued him, I felt useful and helpful. And every time, he took a little more.
The cost was everything. Over-functioning made me exhausted, resentful, and broke, and it taught him that he never had to grow up. Abusers love an over-functioner, because she carries the relationship while he carries nothing. Your competence covers for his absence, so the relationship never shows you what he'd contribute on his own. It shows up most around the holidays, when you plan the meal, buy the gifts, smooth over his moods, and make it look effortless, so no one sees what it costs. Generosity is part of who you are, but generosity without limits becomes an open account he never has to pay into.
Family systems therapists, building on psychiatrist Murray Bowen's work, describe this as a reciprocal pattern. The more one partner over-functions, the more the other under-functions, and each one's role keeps the other's going. Psychologist Harriet Lerner brought the idea to a wide audience in The Dance of Intimacy (1989). An under-functioning partner doesn't have to learn to manage his life as long as you're managing it for him.
For a lot of us, over-functioning is perfectionism in disguise, a fear of failing built in a childhood where being good at things was the only way to feel safe. It becomes who you are. You fix, you perfect, and you carry, at home and at work, and you still feel like an imposter. Complex trauma educator Tim Fletcher, founder of the recovery program RE/ACT, describes people-pleasing, perfectionism, and workaholism as survival strategies children build to cope with an unsafe home. They kept us safe then. As adults, they make us the perfect partner for a man who needs someone to carry him.
If you're not sure whether you're a fixer, take the Are You a Fixer? quiz in Your Toolkit. To meet this need safely, put your capability where it's respected and returned: your career, your friendships, volunteering, your own home and goals. Being needed by people who give back is healthy. Being used by someone who only takes is abuse. Takers need boundaries, because they have none of their own.
Chapter 13: The Need to Finally Win
Earning love from someone who withholds it is the oldest game a hurt child knows. Every breadcrumb of his approval felt like victory, because it was the approval I never reliably got growing up.
He gave just enough. A good weekend, a sweet text, an apology that said all the right words. Then he'd pull away again, and I'd work harder to win him back. It felt less like a relationship than a competition I could never win, because the rules kept changing.
The cost was my self-worth. If his love was the prize, then every time he withdrew, I lost, and I believed I wasn't enough.
To meet this need safely, notice when you're chasing someone's approval, and stop running. Healthy love doesn't have to be won. Spend time with people whose affection is steady and doesn't depend on you losing yourself. It may feel boring at first. That's what safe feels like before your body learns to trust it.
External validation
Underneath the need to win was something bigger. I didn't know how to feel worthy on my own. My sense of whether I was good, lovable, or enough came from outside me, from his approval, his mood, his attention. When he was warm, I was okay. When he was cold, I was nothing. That's external validation, and it hands the most powerful person in your life a remote control to your self-worth. An abuser will use it.
He was the same way, only worse. Everything about him ran on external validation: the charm, the grandiosity, the attention from other women, the audience he played to. Without a crowd telling him he was great, there was nothing inside filling him up.
The work is learning to validate yourself and have confidence in yourself. That means trusting your own reality: your truth, your intuition, your gut instincts. Keep writing in your journal (Chapter 8), so no one can rewrite what happened. Over time, that record becomes internal trust, and you stop needing anyone else to confirm what you already know.
Chapter 14: The Intermittent Reward
He was wonderful half the time. That's not a reason to stay; that's the hook.
Psychologists have known for decades that unpredictable rewards create stronger habits than predictable ones; it's the same principle that keeps people pulling a slot machine. You don't win every time, but you keep feeding in quarters for the rush of the times you do. Remember, though, the house always wins. In 1981, researchers Donald Dutton and Susan Painter described "traumatic bonding": intense emotional attachment that forms when there's a power imbalance and the abuse alternates with warmth. The good times are no sign that the real him is in there; they're part of what binds you to him.
Bad relationship or trauma bond?
Not every bad relationship is a trauma bond, and the difference matters. In a relationship that's simply bad, you're unhappy, you fight, maybe you've grown apart. Leaving is sad, but it also brings relief, and you can picture your life without him. A trauma bond is different. It grows out of the two conditions Dutton and Painter described, and it becomes an attachment that feels like you can't survive without him. You defend him to people who love you. You go back after the worst of it. Leaving feels less like a breakup and more like withdrawal. And very often, the bond mirrors your earliest attachment wounds, which is why it feels so familiar and so impossible to break. If you're not sure which one you're in, take the Am I Trauma Bonded? checklist in Your Toolkit.
Your brain on a trauma bond
It helps to understand what's happening in your body, because it explains why leaving feels physically impossible. The science is still developing and the chemistry is more complicated than any summary, but here's the basic picture researchers describe:
- Stress hormones. When he explodes, withdraws, or threatens you, your body floods with adrenaline and cortisol. You're on high alert, scanning, bracing, unable to rest.
- Relief. When the storm passes, when he apologizes, comes back, or is suddenly sweet, that stress drops all at once. The relief is enormous, and your body experiences it as something close to bliss. That relief is what you might be mistaking for love. What feels like love is really the absence of pain.
- Dopamine. Dopamine is tied to wanting and anticipation, and it fires hardest when rewards are unpredictable. Waiting to see which version of him walks in the door keeps that system on overdrive. And remember, he may be chasing dopamine too. For some of these men, the rush of the fight, the makeup sex, the chaos, and even the abuse itself is the hit. (I'm using "hit" loosely; brain chemistry is more complicated than that, but the pattern is real.) Watch for the signs in him: he gets bored the moment life is calm, ruins vacations and holidays, picks fights out of nowhere, drives recklessly, and chases nights out, porn, and other women's attention.
- Oxytocin. Often called the bonding or cuddle hormone, oxytocin is released during touch, hugging, sex, and orgasm. It helps create feelings of trust and closeness, which is beautiful with the right person and dangerous with the wrong one. It rises with the makeup sex and tenderness after a fight, deepening your attachment to the very person hurting you. Oxytocin doesn't check whether someone is safe before it bonds you to him.
Anthropologist Helen Fisher and her colleagues scanned the brains of people who had just been rejected by someone they still loved. Rejection lit up the same reward and craving regions involved in addiction (Fisher et al., 2010, Journal of Neurophysiology). That's why missing him can feel like withdrawal, why you may feel pulled back to him after the worst abuse, and why you might go back even when you know better. That's science, not weakness. You need to detox, and like any withdrawal, it eases with time, distance, and strict no contact.
I lived this every holiday. One Christmas he was good for a whole month, and we finally told my family we had eloped. Seven days later, on New Year's Day, he was screaming and throwing tools in my garage, shattering my cell phone, trapping me in my own home, and threatening to burn my house down. He staged a gas can by my garage. For a long time afterward, I was afraid to sleep in my own house.
The cost of intermittent reward is that leaving feels like withdrawal, because in a real sense it is. Read your reasons list, the written record of every reason you left (see Survival Tools in Your Toolkit). Call someone. Wait it out. The pull to go back will pass.
Chapter 15: The Need to Be Seen
"He really knows me." I said it, and maybe you have too. But he seemed to understand me so well because he had studied exactly how to work me.
For a woman who never felt truly seen as a child, that early attention is intoxicating. He learned about my past, my family, and my wounds. He remembered details. He reflected my own interests back to me. I felt understood for the first time in years.
The cost came later, when every detail he'd collected became a weapon (Chapter 19 shows how). Being seen turned into being exposed. A normal, healthy person doesn't use your past, especially your trauma, against you to win an argument. They don't kick you when you're already down.
To meet this need safely, let people see you slowly, and watch what they do with what you share. A safe person holds your story with care. They don't bring it up in fights, and they don't use it to win. Therapists, support groups, and long-time friends can give you the experience of being seen without being judged.
Chapter 16: Control as Safety
Managing his moods felt like managing my own safety. If I could predict the explosion, maybe I could prevent it.
So I became a detective. I checked his phone, his social media, his drinking, and his spending. I learned the warning signs in his voice. I tiptoed through holidays and trips, and nothing helped (Chapter 21 explains why trips were the worst). It felt like I was in control. In reality, he was controlling me, because my entire life was organized around him.
It wasn't only me. Even my dogs learned it. When his video call rang, they'd get up and leave the room, because they knew what usually came next: yelling, rage, explosive anger. They were conditioned, just like I was. Animals don't rationalize. They don't make excuses or remember the good times. They just read the danger and get out of the way. If your pets, or your children, flinch, hide, or go quiet when he's around or when his name lights up your phone, take that seriously. They're telling you the truth your mind may be trying not to see.
The cost was my peace and my mind. Hypervigilance is exhausting, and it never works for long, because you can't prevent abuse by being careful enough. The explosion came no matter how perfectly I managed.
To meet this need safely, put your energy into the things you can actually control: your safety plan, your boundaries, your exit, your healing. Real safety comes from distance from a dangerous person, never from predicting him.
External regulation
I didn't just manage his moods to stay safe. I needed his moods to be okay so I could be okay. If he was calm, I could breathe. If he was upset, my whole body went into alarm. My nervous system was regulated by his. That's external regulation, and it's exhausting, because you can never relax when your peace depends on someone else's behavior.
He regulated himself, too, but through dopamine, with the chaos, the fights, the rush. He would put me into fight-or-flight on purpose to get a reaction, and once he had it, he was calm and I was left shaking. My panic was his regulation, and I was the one paying for it. His dysregulation hijacked my nervous system. Researchers call this emotional contagion. One person's emotional state spreads into another person's body, and intimate partners are especially susceptible (Hatfield, Cacioppo and Rapson, Emotional Contagion, 1994). I slowly lost who I was and my ability to stay calm. My character had nothing to do with it. His chaos was landing in my body, often on purpose.
Healthy people still lean on each other, which is called co-regulation, like calming down when a safe friend hugs you. But healthy people can also regulate themselves. The work here is building your own tools. When you're flooded, try box breathing (in for four counts, hold for four, out for four, hold for four), tapping, or splashing cold water on your face, which triggers the body's dive reflex and can slow your heart rate. Grounding, movement, rest, journaling, and people who calm you rather than set you off all help too. Most of all, don't stay around someone who is dysregulated and unpredictable. Leaving the room, or the relationship, is regulation too. You'll find more of these tools, including TIPP, STOP, and the window of tolerance, under Survival Tools in Your Toolkit. Over time, you learn that you can feel your feelings and settle yourself. You can be okay even when someone else isn't.
Chapter 17: The Need to Avoid Shame
I'm smart. I'm successful. I've managed teams and built a career in a field where women get pushed down every day. How could I be in this?
Shame kept me in longer than love ever did. Leaving meant admitting I'd been fooled, that the people who warned me were right, and that I'd wasted years. So I stayed and tried harder, as if enough effort could turn the investment into a success. Economists call it the sunk cost fallacy. I called it not giving up.
The cost was secrecy. I lied to my boss about a black eye. I hid it from my family for years. Shame isolated me better than he ever could.
To meet this need safely, remember that being abused is not a measure of your intelligence. Abusers fool doctors, judges, therapists, and pastors. The shame belongs to him. Tell one person the truth, and watch how much lighter it gets.
Chapter 18: Loving the Potential
I wasn't in love with the man in front of me. I was in love with who he could be, if only.
Part of me simply couldn't believe a person could be this way, that someone could lie this easily, hurt this deliberately, and feel nothing. So I stayed and told myself, He promised he'd change. He's going to therapy. If only he stayed sober. If only the men's group worked. If only therapy clicked. Every short stretch of good behavior felt like a glimpse of the real him, and I held on to those glimpses for years.
Lindsay Gibson calls this the healing fantasy, the hope that if you explain it right, try harder, or love better, the person will finally show up for you. It usually starts with a parent and gets carried into adult relationships. In Disentangling from Emotionally Immature People (2023), she applies the same lens to partners, which is why a fight with him could feel exactly like a fight with my mother. Her advice is to observe rather than engage. Notice the pattern, protect your inner self, and stop expecting emotional depth where there isn't any.
Underneath that hope was a fear I was almost ashamed to admit: What if I leave, and then he changes? What if some other woman gets the man I spent years helping and supporting where he lacked?
If you've had that thought, you're not alone. It's one of the most common things that keeps women stuck. What I've come to believe is that real change in an abusive man is rare, and when it does happen, it takes years of hard, humbling accountability, the kind he never once showed. Far more often, the next woman gets the same man, the same love bombing (the flood of attention, flattery, and grand gestures at the start), the same lies, the same rage, just with a fresh audience. And even if he did change someday, that change would be his work, not your reward for suffering. You don't get your years back by staying longer.
Your life is worth investing in. He isn't. You're allowed to stop funding a bad bet and walk away.
The cost was my present. I gave up years of my real life waiting for a man who didn't exist. The man you love in your imagination is your creation, not his. And the issues he says you have are projections, his own flaws pinned on you.
So stop listening to the words and start watching the patterns. Is the change actually happening? Then ask yourself honestly. If I deal with this for five more years, ten more years, forty more years, is it going to serve me?
To meet this need safely, put your hope into your own potential instead. Who could you be with the energy you've been pouring into him? Hope is a beautiful quality. Invest it in the person who's actually doing the work, which is you.
Part V: Inside the Machine
We took a trip with no plans to get married. Once we were there, he got it in his head that he could get me to marry him, and he pushed until I did. That night, my no didn't matter. When I reported what he'd done, I was the one who got arrested. That's how the machine works. He hurts you, and then he makes you look like the problem.
Once you're in, the abuse works like a system, built to confuse you, isolate you, and dismantle you piece by piece.
The hook
Look at what's really happening. It's a hunt. First he checks whether you can be trapped. Then he keeps you exhausted, confused, and isolated, because a woman in that state can't see clearly or leave easily. When you name his behavior, he takes what he learned about your trauma and throws it back at you. A normal person doesn't think, I lied, and you're the problem because you have trauma. But he does, because he has no regard for your autonomy or your mental health. He wants you running on empty. That's when the placating starts, the apologies and promises to change, and you become dependent on the same man who drained you. That's why he breaks you down. Dependence is the goal.
Overt and covert abuse
Before we go further, you need to know the two faces of abuse, because most women only recognize one.
Overt abuse is the kind you can see and name: hitting, strangling, shoving, throwing things, screaming, name-calling, threats, forced sex. It leaves bruises, broken things, and police reports.
Covert abuse is quieter, and it's often worse because it's so hard to prove. It's the silent treatment and stonewalling. It's gaslighting, rewriting what happened until you doubt your own memory. It's withholding affection, money, or information. It's the eye-roll, the contempt, the staring at other women, the lies about small things, the smear campaign behind your back. It's staying calm on purpose to make you look crazy. Covert abuse is deniable by design: I didn't do anything. You're too sensitive.
Under both is emotional abuse, the quietest and hardest form to detect: constant criticism, belittling, humiliation in front of others, threats, guilt, and withholding love as punishment. He may also run DARVO, a pattern described by psychologist Jennifer Freyd: he Denies what he did, Attacks you for bringing it up, and Reverses Victim and Offender, so suddenly he's the one who's been wronged. Hand him a list of what he's done, and he'll hand you back a mirror-image list accusing you of the same things. Add gaslighting, and you stop trusting your own memory.
Covert control also reaches the people around you. He negs your friends and family, slipping in small put-downs dressed up as jokes, hints that they're not good enough, or suggests they're not safe for you. People who abuse want quiet. They work behind the scenes, where it's harder to see, and the fewer people close to you, the fewer witnesses.
Covert abuse usually comes first, and it wears you down so that when the overt abuse arrives, you're already too confused and depleted to leave. Both are abuse. The Power and Control Wheel and the Covert Control Wheel, under The Wheels and the Cycle of Abuse in Your Toolkit, show both side by side.
Chapter 19: Coercive Control
Content note: this chapter describes sexual violence.
For years I didn't have a name for what was happening to me, because most of it didn't leave a bruise. Then I read sociologist Evan Stark, and everything clicked. Stark compares coercive control to being taken hostage (Women's Aid). Think of it less as a series of fights and more as a pattern that slowly builds an invisible cage around your life, and each incident is just another bar. The goal is control.
Researchers who interviewed survivors describe coercive control as three quiet attacks: on your independence, on your identity and self-worth, and on your sense of safety, until you live in fear and helplessness. One survivor put it in words I could have written myself: slowly, over time, you completely lose yourself (Kassing and Collins, 2025, "'Slowly, Over Time, You Completely Lose Yourself': Conceptualizing Coercive Control Trauma in Intimate Partner Relationships," Journal of Interpersonal Violence; summary).
These are the signs. If several of them are familiar, you are not imagining it.
- He isolates you. Friends drift away, family becomes "the problem," and he starts showing up in your places until they don't feel like yours anymore.
- He monitors you. Your time, your phone, your location, your social media. Sometimes it's spyware. Sometimes it's a barrage of texts.
- He micromanages your daily life. Stark calls it microregulation: how you drive, park, dress, spend, cook, or bag the trash. Nothing is too small to become a fight.
- He controls the money. Taking yours, refusing to share his, borrowing and never repaying, running up debt in your name.
- He degrades you. Name-calling, attacks on your character, humiliating you in front of others, using your trauma against you.
- He threatens you. To hurt you, to hurt himself, to burn down your house, to report you, to take what matters to you.
- He coerces you sexually. Pressure, guilt, getting you drunk, treating your body as something he's owed.
- He cuts off your support. Smearing you to the people who could help, making you afraid to tell anyone.
- He makes you doubt reality. Rewriting events until you trust his version more than your own memory.
In my relationship, it looked like rent he paid three times in four and a half years, loans that were never repaid, and charges on my credit cards. It looked like a man acting as if my home were his, then filing a false police report claiming he lived there. It looked like fights over tiny things. And it looked like sex. On our wedding night I was exhausted and said no, and he told me we were "consummating this." Marriage is not consent. What happened that night has a name, and this book is where I say it. And it wasn't the only time. He violated me about four times during our marriage.
Sexual abuse inside a relationship is still sexual abuse
Rape by a husband or a boyfriend is rape. It's also common where there's other abuse. Sexual assault happens in about 40 to 45% of relationships where a woman is being beaten (Campbell et al., 2003, NIJ Journal), and 8 out of 10 rapes are committed by someone the victim knows (RAINN). It has been a crime in some form in every state since 1993, but many states still treat it differently from rape by a stranger. As of 2019, about 20 states still exempted spouses when the victim was asleep, unconscious, or otherwise unable to consent (Boston Globe). Some of those laws have changed since, so ask an advocate what applies where you live. Whatever the law says, your body is never owed. If it's happened to you, you can call RAINN, the National Sexual Assault Hotline, at 1-800-656-4673, any time.
Economic abuse can look like a "traditional" life
In my case, money control ran mostly the other way. He lived off me. But he also tried the other version. He told me to put in for family medical leave and quit my job, because he was finally going to step up and help out. He never even managed to live in my house; his abuse made that impossible. If I'd listened, I would have had no income and no way out. But for many women, it looks like a man who insists she give up her career to stay home with the kids, then controls every dollar, calls it "his" money, and reminds her she'd have nothing without him. The Duluth Power and Control Wheel, a tool built from survivors' own accounts (see The Wheels and the Cycle of Abuse), lists preventing a woman from getting or keeping a job as economic abuse. The National Network to End Domestic Violence estimates that financial abuse occurs in 99% of domestic violence cases, and it's one of the top reasons women stay (NNEDV). In studies comparing women's reasons for staying, financial factors have explained more than psychological ones (Mississippi State University's Megan Stubbs-Richardson). The problem was never her will to leave. He controls the way out.
Raising children and running a home is work, even if it isn't paid. If you gave up your career for the family, you didn't contribute less. You contributed differently, and often you sacrificed your own earning power to make his career possible. Why should he walk away with more? The law often agrees with you. In the nine community property states, marital property is generally split equally. Most other states divide property "equitably," and courts can consider a spouse's contributions as a homemaker and parent, as well as spousal support. Talk to a family law attorney before you leave, and quietly gather copies of financial records if it's safe.
Every woman should have her own money and her own savings, no matter what. Access to half of the household's money isn't a privilege to negotiate; it's financial freedom, and it's your way out. If you need protection, know this too. In many states, a judge granting a full order of protection (a court order that legally requires him to stay away, also called a protective or restraining order) can also order him to keep paying the rent or mortgage, award maintenance if you're married, and award child support. Ask an advocate what your state allows. Orders of protection can also escalate a dangerous man, so make that decision with an advocate.
He can use God, too
For women of faith, abuse can come dressed in scripture. He quotes the verses about wives submitting and skips the ones about husbands loving their wives. He tells you divorce is a sin, that a good wife forgives seventy times seven, that your suffering is your cross to bear. Researchers who study religion and partner violence have found that some abusers lean on literal readings of select passages to justify what they do (Ross, 2014, in Continuing the War Against Domestic Violence). Faith isn't the problem. For many women, it's a lifeline. The problem is a man who turns it into a leash.
And the church doesn't always help. In a 2014 LifeWay Research survey of 1,000 Protestant senior pastors, 42% said they rarely or never speak about domestic or sexual violence, and 52% said they didn't have enough training to handle it. Yet 62% had counseled couples living with domestic violence (Baptist Standard), which is the very approach advocates warn against, as Chapter 21 explains. In closed communities, the problem can be worse. A 2018 Fort Worth Star-Telegram investigation of independent fundamental Baptist churches found 412 allegations of sexual misconduct, many involving children, across 187 churches and institutions in 40 states and Canada. At least 45 accused men kept working in ministry after church leaders or police knew. Members were taught to take problems to the pastor, not the police, and some victims were made to repent in front of the congregation as if they had sinned, too (Star-Telegram via BishopAccountability).
If your pastor tells you to pray harder, submit more, or keep it in the family, you're allowed to get a second opinion. Safe faith leaders exist, and a good one will put your safety first. Your safety comes before anyone's idea of a good marriage.
Coercive control is not "just" emotional. When researchers at Lancaster University, working with Merseyside Police and Women's Aid, analyzed one English police force's coercive control cases, 95% of the victims were women, and the crime usually came to light only because another offense, such as an assault, was reported (Lancaster University). Living under it is linked to PTSD and depression (Lohmann et al., 2024). In England and Wales, it has been a crime since 2015, punishable by up to five years in prison (Serious Crime Act 2015, section 76). Criminal behavioral analyst Laura Richards, who led New Scotland Yard's Homicide Prevention Unit and created the DASH risk model British police use to assess domestic abuse, helped lead the campaign for that law. In Australia, journalist Jess Hill's See What You Made Me Do (2019), winner of the 2020 Stella Prize, made coercive control a national conversation. If you live somewhere it isn't a crime yet, it is still abuse.
He takes notes
Everything you share in the beginning, your childhood, your trauma, your old relationships, your insecurities, your fights with your family, goes into a file. Early on, it feels like intimacy. Later, it comes back as ammunition. In my relationship, my history became proof that I was the problem. My trauma, my job struggles, my boundaries with my family all turned into evidence that I was judgmental, unstable, impossible to please. He knew exactly where the bruises were, and that's where he pressed.
He even kept track of my venting. Every time I'd had a bad day and complained about a friend, a family member, or a coworker, the way anyone does with a partner they trust, he filed it away. Then, in a fight, he'd pull it out like a card: Maybe I'll tell her what you said about her. Think about that. The private moments when I trusted him most became leverage to threaten my relationships. A safe partner keeps your confidences, even when you're fighting, even after you break up. A man who threatens to expose what you told him in trust is showing you he was never a safe place to put it.
He keeps score
He treats the relationship like a performance review. He keeps running tallies of what you didn't do (I asked you to do four things) and demands accountability from you while offering none in return.
He has no curiosity about your pain
When you tell him you're hurt or you don't feel safe, he doesn't ask what happened or how to make it right. He treats your feelings as a threat to his ego, something to manage, dismiss, or shut down. A healthy partner gets curious: What did that feel like? What do you need from me?
He manufactures crises and no-win choices
He demands a call, then doesn't answer. He starts a fight over something trivial in the house. He creates an emergency out of nothing. When every option you have is the wrong one, you stay off balance, always reacting to his chaos instead of noticing it.
Chapter 20: Loving the Void
The most painful realization of my recovery was that there may have been no one in there to reach.
I kept looking for the wounded little boy behind the lies, the man who would finally hear me if I found the right words. I tried every kind of wording. I used the nonviolent communication scripts, psychologist Marshall Rosenberg's method for calm conversations built around feelings and needs. I stayed calm, then I lost my calm, and he used both against me. He'd take my own words and throw them back. If I told him he was putting his ego in the middle, he'd turn around and say I was the one putting my ego in the middle. I'd ask how he couldn't understand that he was hurting me, how he couldn't see I was falling apart. People like him often can't read emotion in others, lack empathy, and sometimes can't even describe their own feelings. Some never learned. Others simply don't care to, and the result for you is the same.
That is what it means to love a void. You pour your depth into someone who has no accountability, no attunement, and no ability to mirror you, and you read your own reflection as connection. And because no one else in the relationship takes responsibility for anything, you take responsibility for everything. The blame lands on you not because you earned it, but because you're the only one standing there to hold it.
What attunement is, and why its absence hurts so much
Attunement is the experience of being emotionally tuned in to. Someone notices what you feel, reflects it back, and responds. Psychiatrist Dan Siegel describes it as "feeling felt." For a baby, it's a parent who sees distress and soothes it, or sees joy and lights up in return. In the 1970s, psychologist Edward Tronick filmed his famous "Still Face" experiment: a mother played warmly with her baby, then suddenly went blank and unresponsive. Within seconds, the baby tried everything to reconnect, then became visibly distressed when nothing worked. Many survivors recognize both their childhoods and their relationships in those few minutes of film.
Many of us who grew up without attunement learned to give it instead. We became experts at tuning in to everyone else, the hypervigilant, highly sensitive readers of every mood. Then we met men who seemed to tune in to us. Early on, his mirroring felt like attunement. He seemed to know exactly what I felt and wanted. But it was imitation, not connection. Once he had me, the attunement disappeared, and I was the baby in front of the still face, trying harder and harder to get a response from someone who wasn't there.
Real attunement goes both ways, and it includes repair. In healthy relationships, partners miss each other sometimes; what matters is that they notice and reconnect. Look for a man who notices when you're hurt, asks what's wrong, and cares about the answer. Look for one who comes back after a rupture to make it right. You deserve to feel felt.
Chapter 21: The Mask
He was charming at work, with friends, and in the therapist's office. Grandiosity is part of that charm, with the big talk, the big plans, the sense that he's more interesting and more special than everyone else in the room. He charmed the neighbors, my coworkers, even my family. He's such a nice guy. I heard it over and over, from people who had never seen him at 2 a.m. Some of these men are literally Mr. Nice Guy or Mr. Perfect to everyone else. That isn't who they are. It's a false self: a facade, a persona built and maintained for an audience. Couples counseling became his stage. Domestic violence experts warn against couples therapy when there's abuse for exactly this reason. It turns abuse into a "communication problem" and makes the woman who reacts look like the unstable one. One therapist even treated my asking him to slow down in the car as if I'd been pointing a finger of accusation, shaming him. Asking someone to drive safely is normal human behavior. A therapist who can't see that isn't seeing the abuse.
Watch the holidays and vacations, too, because that's where the mask slips. Look at when the worst of it happened. Over and over, he exploded when we were out of town: in hotels, on vacations, out in public, the night before my work party. That's when I was most vulnerable and most isolated, far from my friends, my home, and my routines, with no easy way to leave. And I think part of it was that he couldn't stand for me to relax. Peace bored him. A calm vacation gave him nothing to feed on, so he created the chaos he needed. He'd get his hit of dopamine from the drama, and I'd spend the trip in damage control. If every getaway turns into a crisis, call it what it is. It's a pattern and a choice, not bad luck.
He fakes the future
Early on, he talks about marriage, kids, the house you'll build, the trips you'll take. Survivors call it future faking. It feels like commitment. It's bait. Later, the promises shift: I'll quit drinking. I'm going to therapy. I joined a men's group. It'll be different this time, I promise. That's how the trip at the start of Part V ended in a wedding. He pushed with exactly those promises until I gave in. I came home married to a man I'd already stopped trusting. It wasn't a whim. It was coercive control, and he used the marriage against me almost immediately.
He fakes himself
The man you fell for was a character built for you. The apologies are part of the act. They come with gifts and perfect words, and sometimes with therapy language he's learned to repeat.
In all our years together, I never once saw real tears from him. He didn't seem to have real emotions at all, just reactions: rage when he didn't get his way, charm when he wanted something, calm when calm would provoke me. Everything was performative, including therapy. Robert Hare's psychopathy checklist calls this shallow affect (PMC). Some men cry on cue, and some never cry at all. Either way, watch whether his emotions show up in what he does, or only in what he performs.
Repair or reset
Healthy couples repair. Relationship researcher John Gottman calls it the repair attempt, an effort to acknowledge the hurt and reconnect (Gottman, The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work). Real repair means owning what you did and changing it. That takes vulnerability, and a man with a fragile ego can't be vulnerable, even with himself. So in this cycle, there's no repair, only a reset of love bombing, gifts, and grand gestures. After the blowup comes the calm, and he behaves as though nothing happened, and he expects you to do the same. If you bring it up, you're the one "starting something." If he can't look at what's under the rug, he can't change it. And don't mistake the calm for change. The calm is the part of the cycle that keeps you there.
Lip service
Lip service means saying the right words with nothing behind them. I'm sorry. I'll change. It will never happen again. From him, those words work as a hook rather than a commitment, designed to keep you in place without him having to change anything. Then the same thing happens again the next week. That's the stage of the cycle Lenore Walker called loving contrition back in 1979, often called the reconciliation or honeymoon stage today. The apology isn't the end of the abuse; it's part of it.
A real apology, and a managed one
Learn the difference. A real apology names the specific behavior, without a "but," and takes accountability for it. It doesn't ask you to comfort him. It comes with repair, and then with changed behavior that holds for months and years, not days, without you having to ask for it. A manipulative apology turns him into the victim and shifts the blame back to you. If he can't tell you exactly what he did, he isn't sorry. He's managing you. Anything less than the real thing is a performance, and you don't owe anyone a front-row seat.
Watch what he does, not what he says
Make this your rule. Words are free. Patterns are the truth. If he says he's sober and you keep finding bottles, believe the bottles. If he says he loves you and he keeps hurting you, believe the hurt. If he promises change and nothing changes, believe the nothing. A healthy person doesn't have to keep promising to change and apologizing for the same things over and over and over. When the apologies are on repeat, the apology isn't the point. The behavior is. Real change shows up in behavior, consistently, over time.
Chapter 22: Why Therapy Didn't Fix Him
Therapy can make it worse
I believed therapy would fix him. He went to counseling, joined men's groups, and took the communication class with me. For a little while, it even seemed to help. Then I realized he was actually learning new words and new techniques to use on me. He learned to stay calm on purpose, knowing his calm would provoke me. He learned to say "I feel" and "when you do this" while doing the same things he'd always done. Therapy didn't make him healthier. It made him a more skilled manipulator. Even calm can be a weapon. Skills people learn in therapy, like staying regulated, can turn into stonewalling: I'm going to stay calm, and I'm not going to say a word. Silence like that is a tactic to provoke a reaction, and it's a form of abuse.
This isn't unusual. Abusers often treat therapy as a stage and a training ground. That's why advocates warn against couples counseling when there's abuse, and why general therapy or anger management often isn't enough. At its root, abuse is a problem of entitlement and control, not anger or communication. Specialized programs for abusive partners exist for exactly this reason, and even then, real change is rare (Chapter 18). If he's in a program and you're deciding whether to stay, use Is He Really Changing? in Your Toolkit.
It gets worse, not better
Over time, the mask slips. He can't keep the performance going forever, especially at home, on vacation, or when he's drinking. The longer you stay, the more of the real him you see. For me, the abuse escalated year after year, from lies to screaming, from screaming to throwing things, from throwing things to strangling, punching, and rape.
The parrot, the authority, the blame
As the mask slipped, he leaned harder on borrowed words. He repeated my sentences back to me, word for word, as if he'd thought of them. He quoted the therapist. Using my language and the counselor's language made him sound reasonable and authoritative, especially to outsiders. And under all of it was blame. Blame, blame, and more blame. Nothing was ever his fault. Not the drinking, not the lying, not the violence. There was never accountability, only a new explanation for why it was really me.
Why you keep trying
He will never admit he's the problem, because he can't. And that's exactly what keeps you stuck. You're loving, empathetic, and normal, and your mind can't make sense of a person with no acknowledgment at any level. So you keep trying. It's almost maddening. There has to be something in there, a conscience, a soul, something. Psychologist Martha Stout says the first rule of protecting yourself is to accept that some people truly have no conscience, and that good people struggle to believe it because they assume everyone feels what they feel (Stout, The Sociopath Next Door). You can't reason a man into a conscience he doesn't have. What you're facing isn't a misunderstanding. It's malevolence. Psychologist Peter Salerno, who is trained to score the Hare Psychopathy Checklist, makes a similar point. Many therapists assume manipulative people lack insight into what they're doing, when the manipulation is often deliberate.
Behind the rage, in their own words
Deeyah Khan's documentary Behind the Rage (2022) does something rare. It sits down with men who abused their partners and were held accountable, along with survivors, the families of women who were killed, and the people who run programs for abusive men. Watching it, I saw him in every one of them.
Underneath the anger, these men described the same things. They wanted to feel like a man, and almost anything could make them feel small, inferior, or not good enough. They were insecure, and they couldn't handle their own emotions, so they pushed every feeling outward onto her. Power and control were how they steadied themselves. Several said they needed a "release," as if her body was the place to put it. Some described the dominance and the anger as almost addictive. A few even called it a relapse when they hurt her again. I understand why. But calling it a relapse frames it like a disease that happens to him, and that's a bit of a cop-out. What's underneath is dependence, and feeling weak and vulnerable. The rage covers that up, and she pays for it.
They said they couldn't control their anger. Yet they controlled who they hurt, and where, and when. As the start of this chapter says, abuse is a problem of entitlement and control, not anger.
Most of them still couldn't fully admit what they'd done. Again and again, they said some version of I can't really remember. I blacked out. That's common. Studies of people who have committed violent crimes find that roughly 20 to 30% claim they can't remember the crime, and researchers note that many of those claims are likely feigned, because forgetting is convenient (Jelicic, 2018, Frontiers in Psychiatry). The body tells a different story. In a surge of rage, the sympathetic nervous system floods the body with adrenaline and noradrenaline. The pupils widen to let in more light, so the eyes can take in a threat faster (Iris dilator muscle). That's a body on high alert and locked onto a target, not a mind that's switched off. Whatever he claims he can't remember, his body was paying very close attention to her.
Even in the classes, much of it looked performative. They said the right words for the room. Real change only seemed possible for the men willing to go back and face their own trauma, and even then, every one of them said the same thing: it can't be taken back.
They were also clear that it ran in a cycle, and that they were at their worst when she wanted to leave. The logic is chilling: this woman destroyed me, so I can do that to you. One wife summed it up in a single line. He protected her from everyone except himself.
That's what these men are. They're predators who feel like victims. They hunt the woman who makes them feel like a man, then punish her for every moment she makes them feel small.
Where it started
Many of these men had trouble long before they met us. Robert Hare's psychopathy checklist includes early behavioral problems and juvenile delinquency for a reason (PMC). Some grew up in homes where, as his did, lying was how you kept the peace. Some never learned to regulate their emotions at all. And some rewrite reality so completely that you start to wonder whether they believe it themselves. I watched him spiral into paranoia when he was high, and I watched him describe events I'd been present for as if they'd happened in another universe. Whatever the reason, your job is to protect yourself from it, not to treat it.
Chapter 23: Gaslighting and Cassandra
Content note: this chapter describes strangulation and an arrest.
He rewrote what happened until I doubted my own memory. I told you, you just don't remember. Cassandra syndrome is the name for telling the truth and not being believed, and I lived it with his parents, his kids, his friends, even counselors.
He also ran a smear campaign, turning people against me. And he triangulated constantly, staring at other women in front of me, giving away my seat at a concert and smiling about it, hiding apps on his phone. Each one was designed to make me feel crazy for noticing. It didn't matter that I'd paid hundreds of dollars for that seat. Whether it's a trip or a concert, the point is to make you feel less than.
"Psycho"
He had a favorite word for me: "psycho." He said it when I asked why he was drinking and driving with a child on board. He said it when I was upset that he'd let his kid drink before she had to chaperone her younger siblings on a flight home. Every time I reacted to something he'd done, a label landed on me. "Crazy." "Jealous." "Insecure." "Psycho."
That's the point of the word. Calling a woman "psycho" turns the conversation away from his behavior and onto her sanity. It discredits her before she says another word, to him, to herself, and to anyone he repeats it to. And when you hear it often enough, you start to wonder whether it's true. It isn't. A woman reacting to lies, cheating, and danger isn't psycho. She's paying attention.
Listen for the confession
Pay attention to what he accuses you of. Projection, pinning your own unacceptable feelings or behavior on someone else, is one of the oldest defense mechanisms psychologists describe. The man who calls you a cheater is often the one cheating. The man who calls you crazy is the one making you feel crazy. Research suggests projection can work as a shield for the person doing it. In one study, people told they had a hidden streak of dishonesty, and then given the chance to see dishonesty in someone else, went on to rate themselves as especially honest (Schimel, Greenberg and Martens, 2003, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin). Pinning it on you is how he avoids seeing it in himself. In my experience, almost everything he says about you turns out to be an admission of who he is.
Watch for the contradiction underneath it. He told me over and over that I was crazy, that I was the problem, and yet he wouldn't let me leave. If I was really that crazy, why would he want to stay? Eventually I started asking him exactly that: If that's what you think, if that's how you feel, then why are you trying to stay with me? A man who believed you were the problem would let you go. A man who keeps calling you crazy while blocking the door is trying to keep you too doubtful to walk out.
This may be the key to how the trap works. He doesn't want to treat you right, but he can't stand the thought of anyone else treating you right either. So he has to control you and manipulate you, because if you had options, you'd use them. At its most extreme, this becomes if I can't have you, no one can, and that is not a figure of speech. Jacquelyn Campbell's Danger Assessment, the tool used to screen for the risk of being killed by a partner, asks directly whether he is violently and constantly jealous, using those exact words as the example (dangerassessment.org). If he has ever said it, or acted like it, go to Chapter 27.
What it does to your brain
Constant stress and gaslighting don't just hurt your feelings. They change how your mind works, and naming what's happening is part of getting your mind back.
- Cognitive dissonance. You hold two truths that can't both fit: he loves me and he hurts me. Psychologist Leon Festinger described how painful it is to hold conflicting beliefs, and how the mind tries to relieve that pain by changing one of them (Festinger, A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, 1957). Usually it changes the easier one. You excuse him, or you blame yourself. That's how you end up defending the man who hurt you. Peter Salerno calls the version that grows inside an abusive relationship traumatic cognitive dissonance: holding two incompatible pictures of the same man, the one who loved you and the one who hurt you, until the conflict itself keeps you confused and stuck (Salerno, Traumatic Cognitive Dissonance).
- Brain fog and confusion. Chronic stress floods your brain with stress hormones that weaken the prefrontal cortex, the part that handles focus, planning, and decisions (Arnsten, 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience). Add gaslighting, and your memory is contradicted so often that you stop trusting it. Forgetting things, losing words, and being unable to make simple decisions are signs your brain is under siege, not that you're losing your mind.
- Cognitive impairment from injury. Blows to the head and strangulation can injure the brain. In one study, women who survived partner violence scored lower on memory and executive functioning than comparison groups, and the changes were greatest among women who had been strangled (Raskin et al., 2023, The Clinical Neuropsychologist). Another found memory and learning problems lasting beyond six months after injury (Makovec Knight et al., 2025, Journal of Neurotrauma). If you've ever been strangled or hit in the head, ask a doctor about being screened for brain injury.
Much of this improves with time, once you're safe and supported. In the meantime, write things down. When your memory is under attack, a written record is how you hold on to your reality.
He brings in other people
Triangulation goes beyond other women. It's also about recruiting an audience. He tells his version first, to his ex, his friends, his family, his kids, his coworkers, so that by the time you speak, you sound like the crazy one. Survivors call these people "flying monkeys," after the creatures the witch sends to do her dirty work. Some of them mean well and simply believe him. Either way, the effect is the same. You're isolated and discredited, and taken down a notch.
He brought his kids into it, too. He'd pull them into our fights and make them believe I was the one treating him badly, until I felt ostracized whenever they were around. He wanted to play the good dad and the good ex-husband, and I was cast as the problem.
The goal is to wear you down
None of it is random, not the smear, the confusion, the constant fights over nothing, or the rewritten history. It leaves you depressed and confused, too exhausted to fight back or leave. In 1957, sociologist Albert Biderman studied how prisoners of war were broken down without physical torture. His Chart of Coercion has since been applied to domestic violence, because abusive partners use almost exactly the same methods (Biderman, 1957, Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine; Amnesty International, Report on Torture, 1973; DomesticShelters.org adaptation). When I read it, I recognized every line.
| Biderman's method | How abusers use it | What it looked like for me |
|---|---|---|
| Isolation | Cuts off your support so you depend on him | Smeared me to friends; turned his family and kids against me |
| Monopolization of perception | Keeps your attention fixed on him and his moods; punishes independence | Walking on eggshells; every plan revolved around his drinking and moods |
| Induced exhaustion | Wears down your ability to resist | Endless fights, lost sleep, wrecked vacations, constant crisis |
| Threats | To hurt you, himself, or what you love | Threatened suicide with a gun; threatened to destroy my home |
| Occasional indulgences | Rewards and promises that keep you hoping | The good month at Christmas; men's groups; "I've changed" |
| Demonstrating omnipotence | Shows you he can't be stopped | Charges dropped; a false report that got me arrested |
| Degradation | Humiliation that makes resisting feel pointless | Calling me "insecure," "crazy," and "psycho"; staring at other women in front of me |
| Enforcing trivial demands | Fights over tiny things to train compliance | Blowups over things that didn't matter |
If you're exhausted, confused, and don't recognize yourself anymore, that's the predictable result of a method that was designed to break prisoners of war. Weakness has nothing to do with it.
Chapter 24: Defensive Reactive Abuse
I have to be honest with you about this, because honesty is what makes the rest of my story believable. I lost control more than once. I threw a shoe hard enough to put a hole in my wall, twice. I threw a laundry basket. I threw a drink in his face in public. I screamed things I'm not proud of.
Remember the communication class from Chapter 22? He learned one lesson from it. If he stayed calm and stoic, I would eventually break. So he'd stonewall, roll his eyes, rewrite what had just happened, and wait. When I finally exploded, he'd point at me and say, Look at you. You're crazy. You're a psycho. Then he'd tell his family, his friends, and our counselor about my reaction, never about what he'd done to provoke it. That's what I call defensive reactive abuse: a victim pushed past her limits, whose reaction is then used as proof that she's the abuser. You'll often hear it called reactive abuse. Some experts dislike that term, because calling it any kind of abuse can make a victim sound like a mutual abuser and hand him leverage; they prefer to call it self-defending, a woman finally saying "no more" (Insider, 2022). That's why I add the word defensive. What you did was a reaction to what was being done to you. The goal is to bait you, because once you react, his behavior is no longer the subject. Your reaction is. And it's intentional. He can't sit in the discomfort of being confronted about what he's done, so he provokes you until your reaction becomes the thing everyone looks at. How are you supposed to stay calm when someone has lied to you, cheated on you, and violated you? No woman should have to.
The fight is the point
It took me years to see that the fight itself is part of the manipulation. He doesn't need you happy with him. He needs you focused on him. Praise, tears, anger, pleading, even a screaming match all count. As long as your energy is pointed at him, he's getting what he came for. Clinicians call it narcissistic supply (Chapter 31). That's why winning the argument never ends the argument, and why the only move that works is to stop feeding it. Gray rock (becoming as dull and unreactive as a stone) and no contact work for exactly this reason. They give him nothing to feed on.
Watch for tone policing, too. It's a recognized silencing tactic, attacking the tone of what you said instead of the message itself, so a perfectly valid complaint suddenly sounds irrational (Haverford College). You bring up something real, and the conversation becomes about how you said it. Watch your tone. You should have just said it nicer. The message disappears, and your delivery becomes the problem. There was never a nice enough way. You can't say anything to a thin-skinned, immature, insecure man.
I want to be fair here. Women can be abusive to men, too, and that's real. But I believe some women become reactive because of what's done to them over and over: chronic lying, cheating, sexual secrets, gaslighting, and manipulation designed to break your brain.
Feeling out of your mind
By the end, most women in these relationships will tell you they felt like they were losing their minds and couldn't control themselves. There's a name for the pattern behind that. Psychologist Lenore Walker coined battered woman syndrome in 1979 to describe the psychological effects of living with partner abuse. She's clear that it's what happens when you live with trauma day after day, not a mental illness (WebMD). Walker described four classic characteristics: the woman takes responsibility for his actions, can't place the blame anywhere else, fears for her life or her children's lives, and comes to believe he is everywhere and knows everything. Her later research added symptoms that look a lot like PTSD: reliving the abuse, numbing and avoidance, constant alertness, trouble thinking clearly, damaged relationships, a distorted body image, and problems with intimacy (Walker, The Battered Woman Syndrome). Clinicians note that simply naming it can help a woman accept that she isn't crazy, as her abuser told her any doctor would say (Psychiatric Times).
What all of this creates isn't helplessness. It's dependence. He wants you dependent on him, and that's by design.
My behavior was mine to own, and I own it. Reacting with aggression isn't healthy, and it isn't safe for anyone. But it didn't make the relationship mutual. The question that separates the two is simple. Who was afraid of whom? I was the one planning escape routes from my own bedroom. I was the one who was strangled, punched, and cornered. He wasn't afraid of me. He was using me.
If you've reacted in ways you're ashamed of, you're not alone, and you're not the abuser because of it. Take responsibility for your part, get support so you're not pushed to that edge again, and see the pattern for what it is. The healthiest response to a man who provokes you is distance.
Chapter 25: Diagnoses, Substances, and Excuses
When you love someone who hurts you, it's natural to look for a diagnosis. I did. I read about neurodivergence, narcissism, antisocial personality disorder, and psychopathy. Some of it fit. But a diagnosis is not the same thing as abuse, and these conditions are not interchangeable. This is what I learned.
Antisocial personality disorder
When I finally read the criteria for antisocial personality disorder (ASPD), so much of what I'd lived through made a terrible kind of sense. ASPD is a long-standing pattern of disregarding and violating other people's rights. It includes repeated lying and manipulation, impulsivity, irritability and aggression, reckless disregard for safety (one's own or anyone else's), consistent irresponsibility with work and money, and a lack of remorse. The diagnosis requires evidence of conduct problems that started in childhood or the early teen years, such as juvenile delinquency. Many people with these traits never learned to regulate their emotions, so they outsource it, chasing dopamine through drinking, drugs, sex, spending, and the chaos they create at home. ASPD affects only a small percentage of the population, far more men than women, and it's notoriously resistant to treatment. Only a qualified clinician can diagnose it, but knowing the pattern can help you recognize it.
Batterer types
Researchers Amy Holtzworth-Munroe and Gregory Stuart identified three broad types of men who batter: those who are violent mainly within the family, those with borderline or dysphoric traits such as intense fear of abandonment and emotional volatility, and those who are generally violent and antisocial, with high rates of antisocial personality traits and criminal behavior. Later studies have largely supported this typology. The generally violent and antisocial group shows the most severe violence, drops out of treatment most often, and reoffends the most (Spanish court-referred sample).
Narcissism and psychopathy
Narcissistic and psychopathic traits, especially grandiosity, entitlement, lack of empathy, and manipulation, show up again and again in the research on abuse, and in the stories of women like me. But a trait isn't a diagnosis, and you can't diagnose your partner from a checklist.
Many abusers have no diagnosis at all
In one study of men convicted of partner violence, the largest group, about 40%, was classified as non-pathological, with no significant mental disorder (European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context). Abuse is a choice rooted in entitlement and control. Plenty of men with difficult brains, difficult personalities, or difficult childhoods never abuse anyone, and plenty of abusers are perfectly healthy by any clinical measure.
Is he neurodivergent, and what does he do about it?
Neurodivergence, differences in how a brain works, isn't a red flag. Plenty of neurodivergent men are wonderful partners. What matters is what he does with a diagnosis, more than whether he has one. Does he know himself and take responsibility? Does he use treatment, therapy, coaching, reminders, calendars, or other tools to manage the parts that affect the people he loves? Or does he use his diagnosis as a shield, I can't help it, it's how my brain works, while you pick up everything he drops? A man who manages his neurodivergence protects the relationship. A man who weaponizes it protects himself.
Partner burnout or abuse?
If you're in a forum for partners of neurodivergent people, you may be dealing with burnout from an overwhelmed partner, or you may be dealing with abuse, and it matters which one. A neurodivergent partner who isn't abusive will take responsibility when you name the problem and work on it. An abuser will turn it back on you.
Either way, know the signs of burnout. It builds slowly when one partner carries an outsized share of the responsibilities and emotional labor. Clinicians call the pattern a parent-child dynamic: one partner over-functions while the other under-functions, and the "parent" takes over because otherwise nothing gets done, then resents being in charge (Melissa Orlov). The signs include:
- Exhaustion that rest doesn't fix
- Growing resentment and irritability toward him
- Losing interest in intimacy
- Managing his schedule, his money, his moods, and his messes
- Dropping your own interests, friendships, and downtime
Researchers have also noticed a broader pattern. Many men lean almost entirely on their partners for emotional support. In a national survey, the share of men with no close friends rose from 3% in 1990 to 15% in 2021, and only 21% of men said they got emotional support from friends, compared with 41% of women (Survey Center on American Life). Some now call the result mankeeping, when the woman becomes his whole support system.
There's a bigger pattern here, too. Even when women and men earn about the same, wives still do more than twice as much housework, 4.6 hours a week compared with 1.9, plus about two more hours of caregiving (NPR on Pew Research Center, 2023). And in 80% of the couples sociologist Allison Daminger interviewed, the woman carried most of the invisible work: anticipating needs, making the lists, tracking whether things got done (University of Wisconsin–Madison).
In an abusive relationship, that imbalance isn't an accident. Burnout comes from carrying too much. Abuse is when he makes you carry it on purpose, and punishes you when you set it down.
Substances
Alcohol, THC, and pills made everything worse in my relationship. He was more paranoid, more reckless, and more explosive when he was drinking or high. Research recognizes impulsivity and substance abuse as intensifiers of partner abuse, driving up how often and how severely it happens (Frontiers in Psychiatry). But they don't cause it. He also took ED pills and testosterone, and I swear the testosterone made him rage. The research backs up the concern, with an important caution. A 2024 meta-analysis found a real but small link between nonmedical anabolic steroid use and interpersonal violence, and couldn't say whether the drugs cause the violence (van de Ven et al., 2024). A large national U.S. study found that men who used steroids had higher odds of physically abusing a partner, such as pushing or shoving (Ganson et al., 2022). Most of that research is on high, nonmedical doses, and low prescribed doses show little effect. Like alcohol, these drugs may pour fuel on what's already there. They don't create an abuser. And watch for addiction swapping. He did quit drinking for a while, and I thought we'd turned a corner. He simply switched one addiction for another. Sobriety without real recovery just moves the hole somewhere else. If he gets sober and the control, lying, and contempt remain, you have your answer.
Diagnoses and addictions can explain some behavior. They never excuse abuse, and they never make it your job to fix him.
Part VI: The Warning Signs That Can Kill
My best friend was strangled to death in her own home. She let him stay because she couldn't afford for him to leave. When I heard, I recognized myself, because a man had put his hands around my neck too. I knew then that if I stayed, one of us was going to end up dead, and it was going to be me. I am not dying for a man who can't even love me right. Some signs aren't red flags. They're emergencies. This part tells you which ones.
Some red flags tell you about a man's character. Others predict that he could kill you. You need to know the difference. And remember what the Introduction showed. The most dangerous man is the one in your house.
Chapter 26: Red Flags in Daily Life
This chapter tells the stories behind the red flags. For every flag in one place, paired with its green flag, see Chapter 39. For questions you can use to test a new man, see the Early Screening Tests in Your Toolkit.
He drove recklessly, especially in my car. Domestic violence agencies list "subjecting someone to reckless driving" as physical abuse, and they're right. The National Domestic Violence Hotline's own checklist of physical abuse asks, "Has your partner ever scared you by driving recklessly?" (National Domestic Violence Hotline). When these men get mad, they scare you with the car, because you're locked in and can't get out. He lied about small things for no reason, and about porn and what he was doing on social media. Early on, most of the lies were omissions, and when I asked questions, he got defensive. Later came the gaslighting and DARVO. His phone was always hidden and wiped. And in every fight, my reaction became the subject. He used my trauma against me, flipped the blame with DARVO, and ran the same shame cycle every time. Instead of facing his own shame, he dumped it on me. Underneath all of it was entitlement, no accountability, and little empathy.
Can he take input? Can he hear "no"? Can he hear "you're wrong"?
Underneath the bravado, most of these men are deeply insecure. You see it the moment you offer a suggestion, a correction, or a different opinion. A secure man can hear "I think you missed the turn" and say, "Oh, thanks." An insecure man hears an attack on who he is.
Relationship researcher John Gottman calls this skill accepting influence. In his long-term study of newlywed couples, men who let their wives influence them had happier marriages and were less likely to divorce (Gottman, Coan, Carrère and Swanson, 1998, Journal of Marriage and the Family). When a man refused to share power with his partner, Gottman estimated an 81% chance the marriage would self-destruct (Gottman, The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work; Gottman Institute).
I lived the opposite of accepting influence. My sister asked him to slow down, and he didn't. My simple requests turned into fights. When my mother made a small suggestion, he did the opposite to prove a point. Then he called us "bossy" and said my mother didn't need to be around anymore. That's what happens when a fragile ego meets a capable woman.
Gottman also identified what he calls the Four Horsemen, the patterns that predict divorce: criticism, defensiveness, stonewalling, and contempt. Contempt is the worst. It's the eye-roll, the sneer, the mockery, the name-calling, the message that I am better than you, and Gottman's research found it to be the single strongest predictor of divorce (Gottman, The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work). Stonewalling was his favorite, and Chapter 24 shows what he did with it.
An honest caveat. The Four Horsemen describe struggling marriages in general, not abuse specifically, and Gottman's prediction numbers have been questioned by other researchers. In an ordinary bad marriage, both people may slip into these patterns. In an abusive one, contempt runs mostly one direction and comes with fear. If you're afraid of the person rolling his eyes at you, you have a power problem, not a communication problem.
Is he transparent, or is he hiding his phone?
Everyone deserves some privacy. But privacy and secrecy aren't the same thing. Privacy is a closed bathroom door. Secrecy is a locked phone that goes into the bathroom with him every time.
Mine took his phone everywhere, including the bathroom. He wiped his whole phone before he came to my house. He cleared his history constantly. He had hidden social media accounts. He hid his location. He blocked the photos I posted of us and put up a picture of himself with a buddy instead. When I finally took his phone, he threw things at me. Once, he grabbed for it while I was driving. A man with nothing to hide doesn't react like that.
A secure, honest partner is open without being asked. You can see his life, meet his friends, and know where he is, not because you're monitoring him, but because he has nothing to hide and wants you there. If you find yourself checking his phone, tracking his social media, or reading his bank statements, notice that, too. Checking doesn't make you crazy; your gut already knows something is wrong, and the urge usually comes less from wanting to control him than from trying to create a safe space where love can be built, because you're capable of giving that kind of love. It's okay to expect that a man sharing your house, your bed, and your body isn't doing certain things on his phone.
Listen to how he talks about his exes
Is he still talking about her, a lot? Is he still in touch in ways that cross lines, or still angry, still obsessed? And what does he call her? If every woman before you was crazy, a liar, or a gold digger, and none of it was ever his fault, pay attention. Domestic violence agencies list how he talks about past partners among the warning signs (Hope Haven). Someday, you'll be the crazy ex in his story. And watch his boundaries with her, too. Mine was still holding on to his ex-wife. He kept loose, secretive contact with her, wanted to look like the perfect ex-husband, and seemed to enjoy how insecure it made me feel, then called me jealous for noticing. A healthy man can talk about his past with some honesty, own his part, and keep clear boundaries.
Watch how he reacts when you dress up
At first, he may love it. He shows you off, compliments you, tells everyone how lucky he is. Then, slowly, it changes. Why are you dressed like that? Who are you trying to impress? You're wearing that? Your appearance becomes his business, then his property. Abuse agencies list telling you what to wear among the classic warning signs (Hope Haven). And sometimes it's the opposite kind of cruelty. I got dressed up for a dinner out with him and his kids on a trip and spent the evening watching him stare at another woman. Either way, the message is the same. Your body and your beauty are there to serve his ego, not to belong to you.
Watch how he changes, too
All of a sudden, he starts dressing differently. He's in the gym every day. He cares about his appearance in a way he never did before. On its own, that means nothing; people get healthier. But a sudden makeover paired with a hidden phone, new secrecy, or reckless behavior is a pattern worth noticing. It often means he's performing for someone else's attention. Infidelity specialists say the same thing. Marriage and family therapist Caroline Madden, who specializes in infidelity, points to a whole new wardrobe or the gym five nights a week as a possible sign he's sprucing up for someone new (Bustle). Private investigator Danine Manette, author of Ultimate Betrayal, warns that a lifelong couch potato who suddenly becomes a gym rat may be trying to impress someone else, or that the other woman may be at that gym. Both are clear that one change alone proves nothing. It's the combination that matters.
Other signs he's insecure, not confident:
- He's jealous of your friends, your coworkers, your exes, even your family.
- He needs constant reassurance, but nothing you say is ever enough.
- He accuses you of cheating or flirting, often while he's the one doing it.
- He competes with you instead of cheering for you, and your wins seem to wound him.
- He puts you down in front of others to look bigger.
- He calls you the stereotyped, misogynistic names men use to dismiss women: "insane," "crazy," "psycho," "drama queen," "insecure," "emotional," "bossy," "bitchy."
- He can't admit a mistake, take input, or apologize without a "but."
- He checks your phone, or demands to know where you've been, while hiding his own.
Real confidence is calm. It doesn't need to control what you wear, who you talk to, or how big you're allowed to be.
No woman was off limits
The lies about other women started before we were even together (Chapter 10), and once we were a couple, they never stopped. He gawked at women in restaurants, out in public, at the farmers market, with me sitting right there, sometimes in the middle of a conversation. Hello? We're talking here. Those weren't wandering eyes. It was a neg, a deliberate little put-down designed to make me feel smaller. He even talked about which women in my own family were attractive.
That's devaluation, and it's deliberate. Every stare, every comparison, every comment about another woman sends the same message: you're replaceable, and you should be grateful I'm here. It keeps you insecure and competing, working harder for his attention. And when you finally say something, he calls you jealous and insecure, so now you're the problem for noticing. A man who respects you doesn't make you compete with every woman in the room, and he certainly doesn't rate the women in your family. If a man can't control his eyes, he can't control his heart.
Online lusting is not harmless
Somewhere along the way, scrolling through women's profiles became normal. Men follow, watch, and save photos of women they barely know, or don't know at all: exes, coworkers, women from the gym, women from his kids' activities, strangers. It's treated as nothing. It isn't nothing.
When he was angry with me, he went looking at another woman's photos online, then admitted he'd done it to get back at me. He kept a hidden account full of women. He messaged other women while telling me he was going to bed. None of those women agreed to be part of his fantasies, and I never agreed to compete with them. It's nonconsensual lusting, plain and simple. Using women's images for his own gratification without their knowledge isn't so different from porn. It turns real women into objects. That's not consent, and it's not respect.
Scrolling through women's public photos isn't stalking in the legal sense. But it's a window into how he sees women, and the same habits can turn toward you. Technology has become one of the main tools of abuse. The CDC found that much stalking is carried out through technology, like unwanted calls, texts, and messages (VAWnet), and more than 1 in 4 U.S. women (28.2%) have experienced technology-facilitated sexual violence in their lifetimes (VAWnet). The man who obsessively watches other women online may also watch you: tracking your location, reading your messages, monitoring who you talk to. Pay attention to how he treats women on a screen. It tells you how he sees women in real life.
Negging and "just a guy thing"
Negging means manipulating someone with thinly veiled insults and backhanded compliments meant to wear down her confidence (Merriam-Webster). The tactic came out of the pickup-artist world. One of its promoters described a neg as having two purposes: to briefly lower a woman's self-esteem and to suggest he's not that interested, so she'll work for his approval (Refinery29). You look great for your age. I didn't think you could pull that off. Playful teasing is mutual and light. Negging is one-sided, and it has an agenda.
Then there are the small disrespects we're told to shrug off as just a guy thing:
- Flirting with the waitress, the bartender, the cashier
- Rating women's bodies, or comparing you to them
- Liking, following, and studying other women's photos
- Keeping an ex, or a "friend," on standby
- Chatting with women in messages he won't let you see
Some therapists call these behaviors micro-cheating. Australian psychologist Melanie Schilling, who popularized the term, describes it as anything short of an affair that he couldn't talk about openly with you (NBC News). That's a useful test. And remember, the woman on the other end of his screen never consented to being looked at that way. None of this is "just a guy thing." It's disrespect, and often it's a neg aimed at you.
For so long, women were asked to normalize all of it: the porn, the gawking, the secret social media, the locked phone called "privacy." It was never okay. If a man wants access to your body and your emotions, you do not have to tolerate any of it.
When he drugs you
It isn't only abusive partners who do this. Dates and acquaintances do it too. Some men slip something into a drink or food, or hand over pills disguised as something harmless. Partners do it to control you, to keep you sick and dependent, or to make you look intoxicated or unstable to police, doctors, and courts. Dates and partners alike do it to sexually assault you. No solid research yet shows how common it is inside relationships, but survivors describe it again and again (DomesticShelters.org; Lisa Aronson Fontes, Psychology Today).
Watch for waking up groggy or confused with gaps in your memory, feeling far drunker than what you drank, feeling sick in ways no doctor can explain, or feeling better whenever you're away from him.
If you think you've been drugged or assaulted, go to the hospital, not only the police. Go as soon as you can, ideally within 24 to 48 hours. Ask for a sexual assault forensic exam, often called a rape kit, and ask for a sexual assault nurse examiner or a victim advocate. Ask for a toxicology test, and name any drug you suspect, because hospitals may not test for it otherwise. Hair testing can sometimes detect drugs weeks later. Under federal law, states must make the exam available without charging you and without requiring you to report to the police first (National Institute of Justice), so you can decide about reporting later. If you can, don't shower or change clothes first; bring what you were wearing in a paper bag. RAINN's hotline, 1-800-656-4673, can tell you which hospital near you does these exams. Then call an advocate and make a safety plan.
Chapter 27: Lethality Indicators
Content note: this chapter discusses strangulation, weapons, and homicide.
Please read this chapter even if you skip everything else.
If he has ever put his hands on your neck, you are at risk of being killed, no matter what he says afterward. Women who survive strangulation by a partner face a 750% higher risk of later being killed by him (Glass et al., 2008). Strangulation can leave no marks at all, and it can cause brain injury and delayed complications. If it has happened to you, see a doctor and tell them, even if you feel fine.
The first time I was strangled, I was a girl. An older boy held me down inside a zipped tent. The second time, I was pushed onto a bed so soft I couldn't get up, and I had to wedge my feet into his stomach and kick him off with everything I had. Both times, I got free because I fought. Both times, it could have ended differently. I didn't know then what I'm telling you now.
It isn't choking. It's strangulation
Choking is what happens when food goes down the wrong way. When a man puts his hands around your neck, it's strangulation. He is stronger than you, and his upper body weight is behind his hands. On average, men carry about 60% more muscle than women and about 80% more muscle in their arms, and their upper-body strength is around 90% greater, close to double yours (Lassek and Gaulin, 2009, Evolution and Human Behavior; Abe, Kearns and Fukunaga, 2003). When a man that much stronger puts his hands around your neck, he's telling you he can take your life. You aren't in a fight. You're being strangled.
Pressure on the blood vessels of the neck can make someone lose consciousness within seconds, and brain injury can begin soon after. In a landmark review of strangulation cases in San Diego, about half of the victims had no visible injuries at all (Strack, McClane and Hawley, 2001, Journal of Emergency Medicine). No marks doesn't mean no harm. Journalist Rachel Louise Snyder's No Visible Bruises (2019) documents how often these internal injuries, including brain injuries, go unseen by emergency rooms and uncharged by prosecutors. And in the same study that found the 750% risk, 43% of women killed by a partner had been strangled by him before (Glass et al., 2008). The history is the warning.
If he has put his hands on your neck even once, you're not in a bad relationship. You're in danger.
The other major warning signs:
- He owns a gun or can get one, especially if he has threatened suicide or murder.
- He has threatened to kill you, himself, your children, or your pets.
- He has threatened to burn down your home, or done something that looks like preparing to.
- The violence is getting worse or happening more often.
- He has forced sex on you. In Jacquelyn Campbell's national study, 57% of women killed by a partner had been forced into sex by him, compared with about 15% of abused women who survived. That made forced sex one of the strongest predictors of being killed, at about 7.6 times the odds (Campbell et al., 2003, NIJ Journal).
- He stalks you, tracks you, or shows up where you are, especially after a breakup.
- You've recently left him or are trying to.
- He's extremely jealous or controlling.
I had almost all of them: strangulation, a gun waved on a video call during a suicide threat, a threat to burn my house down followed by a gas can staged by my garage, escalating violence, and rape.
Jacquelyn Campbell at Johns Hopkins built a tool called the Danger Assessment from these exact factors. An advocate can walk through it with you. One of the most sobering findings from her research is that women often don't see how much danger they're in. According to people who knew them, only 47% of women killed by a partner had accurately predicted their risk beforehand (Johns Hopkins). Women rarely overestimate the danger. Far more often, we talk ourselves down. So if you're afraid of him, believe your fear; it's one of the strongest warning signs there is. And if you're not afraid but you recognize these signs, don't let that reassure you. I underestimated my risk too. Let someone trained help you see it clearly.
The homicide timeline
Criminologist Jane Monckton Smith studied 372 intimate partner killings in the UK and found the same eight-stage pattern again and again (Monckton Smith, Violence Against Women, 2020; In Control: Dangerous Relationships and How They End in Murder, 2021):
- His history: a record or past allegations of stalking, control, or abuse with earlier partners.
- The early relationship: fast commitment, possessiveness, and jealousy.
- Control: coercive control, stalking, violence, and isolation.
- A trigger: separation or a threat of it, or a financial or health crisis that threatens his control.
- Escalation: the control and threats become more frequent and more severe.
- A change in thinking: attempts to get her back fail, and he decides the loss is permanent.
- Planning: stalking, watching her, searching online, getting a weapon.
- Homicide, and sometimes suicide.
For you, this timeline means one thing above all. These killings are rarely "crimes of passion" out of nowhere. They follow a path, and the path can be seen and interrupted. If you recognize your relationship anywhere past stage three, especially a trigger like separation, tell an advocate exactly where you are.
When he suddenly goes quiet
After months of chaos, calm feels like relief. But if he's been relentless and then suddenly backs off, especially right after you've left, don't take it as proof he's changed. Quiet can mean he's stopped trying to get you back. Check what you're seeing against Is He Really Changing?, and tell your advocate about the shift.
When it feels like the only way out is to die
Coercive control can leave you so stuck that you can't see your own way out. That feeling isn't weakness, and it isn't rare. In a study of more than 600 women abused by a partner, about 1 in 5 had threatened or attempted suicide (Cavanaugh et al., 2011, Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior). If you've thought about ending your life, call or text 988, any time, and then tell your advocate. Feeling trapped is a symptom of what he's done to you. It isn't proof there's no exit.
Staying can be survival
From the outside, staying, keeping quiet, or dropping the charges looks like giving up. From the inside, it's usually a risk calculation. You know better than anyone what he'll do if you push. That's why the real question was never Why didn't you just leave? It's What would leaving have cost you, and was anyone ready to protect you from it?
His story outlives hers
When a woman is killed, he's often the one left to tell the story, and he tells it as the injured party: she provoked him, he lost it, it was passion. That version too often ends up in court and in the news, and she isn't there to correct it. It's one more reason to write down what's happening and tell someone safe now, while your voice can still be heard.
Chapter 28: My Guardian Angel
Content note: this chapter describes the death of a woman killed by her partner.
She was my family. She's my guardian angel now.
She was found dead in her home, and the man she lived with was charged with killing her. He strangled her. He had a history of violence before she ever met him, and strangulation was part of that history.
She was a fixer, like me. She grew up watching her father abuse her mother, and every relationship she got into after that was abusive in one way or another. She knew the script by heart, because she'd learned it as a little girl.
In the end, it came down to money. She told me she couldn't afford to have him leave. She couldn't afford to lose his help with the bills. Instead, she lost her life. That is too high a price for anyone to pay. This is why economic abuse matters, and why I keep telling you to call a shelter and make a plan. A woman who feels she can't afford to leave needs to know that help with money and housing exists.
She left behind two beautiful children. They're grown now and having babies of their own, and they're doing it without their mother's guidance. I wish they could have known her the way I did: her laugh, her smile, her genuine heart. I know that if she had understood that keeping him around for the money would cost her life, and cost her children and grandchildren their mother, she never would have let him stay.
I will never see her again. I will never hear her laugh. She died because she loved the wrong man.
The signs were there: his history, the violence, the control. But the signs were hidden, too, behind isolation and embarrassment and money, the same things that kept me quiet for so long. Women hide it. We tell ourselves it was one bad night. We protect his image. "One bad night" is almost never just one night. And strangulation is one of the clearest warning signs that a man is capable of killing, never just a fight that got out of hand.
I think about what she would say if she were alive. This chapter is for my guardian angel, and for every woman who didn't get the chance to get out. Her life mattered. Her death has to mean something.
Part VII: Getting Out
Five therapists told me I was being abused. Knowing it didn't get me out. Getting out is rarely one brave moment. Expect it to take time, and expect him to test every boundary you set, long after you've drawn it.
Leaving is a process, often a long one, and it's the most dangerous part of the whole relationship. This part is about doing it safely, with people beside you.
Chapter 29: Isolation and Silence
Isolation doesn't happen all at once. It happens a little at a time, until one day you realize no one really knows you anymore.
For me, it started when I moved to a new town where I knew almost no one. A move away from your friends and family is one of the easiest openings for isolation. Research shows women who have recently moved face nearly double the risk of partner violence (see "They find you when you're vulnerable" in Chapter 1). He was working on the road, and every other weekend he went back home to drink. I was alone more than I'd ever been, and the relationship became my whole world.
Then my circle got smaller. He smeared me to people we both knew. He started showing up at the places I'd brought him, until even my favorite spots didn't feel like mine. Friends who had once welcomed us stopped inviting us. Some got tired of watching me go back to him. I understand that now, but at the time it felt like more proof that I was alone.
And embarrassment did the rest. I didn't tell my family how bad it was. I covered for him at work. Eventually no one knew what was really happening, or how bad it had gotten.
Shame grows in silence, and it shrinks when you speak.
There's a physical reason that question lands. On average, a woman has only about half a man's upper-body strength and two-thirds of his lower-body strength (Miller et al., 1993). Grip strength, a common stand-in for overall strength, shows the same gap. Feeling unsafe around him is reasonable, not paranoid. He is very likely far stronger than you, and he knows it.
Chapter 30: Tell Someone
Telling someone is terrifying. You may be afraid they won't believe you, that they'll judge you for staying, or that it will get back to him. You may have already told someone who didn't handle it well.
You don't have to start with friends or family. It's often easier to tell an advocate or a therapist first. They're objective, they've heard it all, and they know how to help. What matters most is that you know your truth, that your voice matters, and that people love you.
Any of these can be your first: a therapist, a domestic violence advocate, a hotline, or a support group. Advocates are trained for exactly this, and they won't pressure you to do anything you're not ready for. Friends and family can be your first, too, but go in knowing they may not understand. In my experience, telling people close to me sometimes brought judgment for staying, and that pushed me further into isolation. That's not a reason to stay silent. It's a reason to start with someone trained.
Show them the evidence, too: photos, videos, texts. When I finally sent the videos of him screaming, throwing things, and calling me names to people who knew him, they believed me. Some had already seen who he was.
Even if you feel ashamed, say it. People love you, and they can't help with what they don't know. If you're keeping quiet to protect them, think about what it would do to them if the worst happened and they never knew. They would much rather help you now.
Your voice is your weapon. If he doesn't like you talking about his behavior, he shouldn't be behaving that way.
When telling someone goes wrong
Be prepared, because not everyone will respond the way you need. When I opened up to one friend, she said, You're choosing to let him back in. Why don't you just leave him? I heard versions of it over and over: You're in charge of the decisions you make. You're making excuses for him. Why don't you get some self-respect? It's pretty harsh to hear when you're already on the floor. It's true that the choice was mine. But that kind of response puts the whole weight on the woman, and it misses how this works. He didn't respect my boundaries. He didn't listen to my words. What he cared about was staying in the relationship, because what he wanted was control and access. Do you really think a man who is capable of traumatizing you emotionally and being physically aggressive is going to honor your boundaries just because you set them? He won't. He's entitled.
So if telling a friend or family member doesn't bring the support you hoped for, don't stop there, and don't stop talking. People close to you may already have judged the relationship, or judged you. Find objective support from people who aren't tied up in it: a therapist, a domestic violence advocate, a women's support group. They understand that leaving is a process, not one decision.
"Just leave" sounds easy from the outside. But by the time you're asking for help, you've been torn down and isolated. Your friends and family may even resent you for disappearing on them, for not calling, for not being part of their lives. That resentment can come out as judgment. You don't have to take their verdict as yours. And if the abuse is real and dangerous, pulling the people you love into the middle of it can put them in danger too. That's one more reason to lean on objective support.
What they can't see from the outside is that this isn't a simple decision. Your brain is literally wired to this person. The cycle of fear and relief has trained your nervous system to reach for him, and breaking that takes a detox, not a decision (Chapter 14). And there's a harder truth underneath. A trauma bond usually mirrors early attachment wounds, and both people in it carry wounds of their own. That means the people who created your first wounds, often your own family, may not be safe places to land. They may not understand what you're going through, or they may repeat the same blame he uses, because it's the same family script you learned to accept in the first place. If the people closest to you are confused or even unsympathetic, that doesn't prove you're wrong. It's one more reason to find people who understand trauma.
"Get some self-respect" stings most of all, especially from family who had a hand in the original wound. Self-respect is exactly what the relationship takes. Being told to have it doesn't give it back. It has to be rebuilt, slowly, with support.
In the end, though, you need self-respect. Support helps you rebuild it, but no one can hand it to you. Stop outsourcing it. Not to him, not to your family, not to your friends. It has to come from you.
Chapter 31: It Takes More Than One Try
You may still love him. That's normal, and it doesn't make you foolish or weak. Love and abuse can live in the same relationship, and missing him doesn't mean you should go back. You can love someone and still choose to leave.
I left and went back more times than I can count. If you've gone back, you haven't failed. You might not get out the first time or the fifth time, but you will get out if you keep trying.
It can take half a dozen attempts or more. Advocates often say it takes an average of seven tries to leave for good; the figure is widely repeated, though no one has traced it to a single study. The research that does exist points the same way. In a study of 90 women in a domestic violence shelter, two-thirds had already left and gone back at least once. Among those women, nearly nine in ten had tried at least twice, and a third had tried five or more times. The most common reason they had gone back wasn't money or having nowhere to go. It was emotional attachment to the man who hurt them (Griffing et al., 2002, Journal of Interpersonal Violence). That's the trauma bond, and it's why every attempt counts, even the ones that don't last.
Leaving is a process, not a moment
Researchers who study how women leave describe it in stages. First comes being in: tolerating the abuse, explaining it away, living in some denial. Then getting out: actually leaving, often more than once. Then going on: grieving the relationship and slowly learning to trust again. What moves a woman from one stage to the next is a turning point, and the path is rarely a straight line (Khaw and Hardesty, 2007, Family Relations).
Studies of women who left describe the same turning points again and again:
- The violence gets worse. Escalation makes the danger impossible to deny.
- She realizes he will not change. Not "might not." Will not.
- She sees what it's doing to her children, or to herself.
- She becomes more afraid to stay than to leave.
- Someone she trusts says it plainly, like a friend, an advocate, or a therapist who shows her she can afford to go.
And what makes leaving possible is support: family and friends, shelters, and the opportunity to go (Baholo, 2012). In one Australian study of 53 women, specialized domestic violence services were the single most significant help (Patton, Pathways: How Women Leave Violent Men, 2003). If you recognize yourself somewhere in these stages, you're in the process, not stuck.
What it does to the children
If you have children, the abuse doesn't stop at you. Children don't have to be hit to be hurt. Watching their mother be screamed at, threatened, or hurt is trauma in its own right, and the CDC lists witnessing violence in the home as one of the adverse childhood experiences linked to lifelong effects on health (CDC). In one national survey, about 1 in 4 American children had been exposed to family violence at some point in their lives, and nearly 1 in 5 had seen physical violence between their parents or a parent's partner (Hamby, Finkelhor, Turner and Ormrod, 2011, OJJDP). Even babies and toddlers are affected. A study that followed young children from age one to seven found that the more violence a child witnessed, the more PTSD symptoms the child showed, and that mothers' and children's trauma symptoms rose and fell together (Levendosky, Bogat and Martinez-Torteya, 2013, Violence Against Women). And it often doesn't stay at watching. In homes with partner abuse, children are far more likely to be abused or neglected themselves; early studies put the overlap at 30% to 60% (NCJFCJ).
I know this from the inside. I was four, living with my mother and a man who abused her, when I kicked through a glass window trying to get back to my grandmother's house. Children who grow up like that carry it with them. In the Adverse Childhood Experiences study, women who were exposed to violence in their families as children had a significantly higher risk of being abused by a partner as adults, and the more kinds of adversity they'd lived through, the higher the risk (Whitfield, Anda, Dube and Felitti, 2003, Journal of Interpersonal Violence). That's the cycle this book is about. Your children learn what love looks like by watching you.
So if you've stopped believing your own life is worth the fight, look at theirs. You have more to live for than this. My guardian angel's children grew up without their mother. Leaving is for them as much as for you; it's how the pattern stops with you. Remember what saved me as a child. It was one stable, loving adult. You can be that for your kids. If you have children, call a shelter or the hotline before you go, ask an advocate about protecting them in any custody decision, and look for a counselor who works with children exposed to violence.
You have choice. You have agency. Staying silent, refusing to look at it, and suffering alone won't save you. You need community, people, and therapy. And you need to fight for yourself. Be fierce about it. It's your life, too, and you don't have to tolerate anyone or anything. Ask yourself: What agency do I have here? What choices do I have? What can I do to protect myself? Leaving a trauma bond is harder than a normal breakup. When you leave a healthy relationship, you leave with yourself mostly intact. When you leave a trauma bond, you leave broken: depressed, exhausted, maybe sick, maybe losing your hair, barely recognizing yourself. He dismantles you on purpose, because a woman who's been eroded doesn't have the strength to go. Each attempt teaches you something for the next one.
Why he can't let you go
It was never about wanting you, only about not losing control of you. Those are two different things, and that's why he can't be with you and can't let you go. Researchers Margo Wilson and Martin Daly called this male sexual proprietariness, treating a partner as a possession, an attitude they linked to violence against wives (Wilson and Daly, 1993, Violence and Victims). You don't have to be wanted to be owned. People hold on to things they don't value, as long as no one else gets them.
The bond pulls on him, too, but in a different way. Psychologist Donald Dutton's research on abusive men describes many as intensely dependent on their partners and terrified of abandonment, and that fear can turn into rage (Dutton, The Abusive Personality). His side of the bond is about control and the next hit of dopamine. It doesn't make what he does mutual, and it doesn't make it your job to manage.
How controlling he was during the relationship tells you how hard he'll hold on afterward. In a 2023 study of 346 Canadian women, 86.4% said their ex used at least one coercive controlling tactic after they separated: stalking and harassing them, abusing them financially, and discrediting them to authorities (Tutty, Radtke and Nixon, 2023, Violence Against Women). Clinicians call this narcissistic supply, an idea that goes back to psychoanalyst Otto Fenichel in 1938: a need to pull attention from a partner in any form, to be admired, adored, feared, or even despised. That's why even your anger can feed him, and why he may keep coming back even after he's moved on to someone new. He doesn't want the relationship. He wants access to you.
The part that matters most is this. Separation is a dangerous window, but staying isn't safer. In the Chicago Women's Health Risk Study, after accounting for other risk factors, leaving an abusive partner reduced the odds of further abuse by about two-thirds, without increasing how severe the abuse was when it did happen (Sonis and Langer, 2008, Journal of Family Violence). The study involved low-income women in one city, so the researchers urge caution, but the message is clear. Leaving, with a plan, is how the abuse ends. Chapter 32 shows you how to build that plan, and the Survival Tools in Your Toolkit will help you carry it out.
Chapter 32: The Safety Plan
Content note: this chapter mentions sexual violence and an arrest.
Work with a domestic violence advocate; they do this every day. Document everything: photos, videos, police reports, and a dated log. Change your passwords, secure your keys and accounts, add cameras, pack a go bag, and decide who your safe people are. Then start untangling the legal side, whether that's divorce or annulment, shared property, or debts. You'll find a full go-bag checklist and the rest of these tools under Survival Tools in Your Toolkit.
Know your rights
The legal system isn't built to protect you automatically. You have to know your rights and ask for them, sometimes over and over.
- Victims' rights laws. Every state has some form of crime victims' rights. Many have adopted a constitutional amendment called Marsy's Law, named for Marsalee "Marsy" Nicholas, a college student murdered by her ex-boyfriend in 1983. California passed it first in 2008, and many states have since followed. The details vary, but these laws typically give victims the right to be notified when the accused is released, to attend key court hearings, and to confer with the prosecutor (Stateline). Some states have their own victims' rights amendments instead. Ask the prosecutor's victim advocate exactly what your state guarantees you.
- Release notifications. Register with VINE (VINELink) or your state's notification system, so you get a call or text when he's released from jail.
- Firearms. Federal law prohibits people under certain domestic violence protective orders, or convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence, from having guns. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the protective-order ban in 2024 (United States v. Rahimi). Ask that his weapons be addressed in any order.
- Address confidentiality. Many states have a "Safe at Home" or address confidentiality program that gives survivors a substitute address for public records, so he can't find you through them.
- Work and housing. Many states protect survivors who need time off for court or safety, or who need to break a lease to get away. Ask an advocate what applies where you live.
Advocate for yourself with police
Most police officers are men, and some carry the same aggression and ego you're running from. Some are abusers themselves. Research on how common domestic violence is in police families is limited and disputed, with study estimates ranging from about 5% to 40% depending on how violence was defined (for example, Johnson, 1991; Neidig, Russell and Seng, 1992). A 1994 survey found that 45% of departments had no specific policy for officers accused of domestic violence, and the most common discipline was counseling (National Center for Women & Policing, Police Family Violence Fact Sheet).
Many survivors never report at all. In 2023, only 46% of rapes and sexual assaults were reported to police, and the year before it was just 21% (Bureau of Justice Statistics, Criminal Victimization, 2023). If you decide to report, you deserve to be taken seriously.
Police were called on him several times during our relationship. They didn't always protect me. I told the police he had violated me in my bedroom. He told them he lived in my house, which he didn't, and that false report is what they acted on. I showed them his address on his own work paperwork. Because we were married, they treated it as his home anyway, and I was the one they arrested. I was booked, they tried to get me to talk, and I used my right to stay silent. Hours later, they released me right back into his hands. That's what can happen when officers don't understand coercive control. So here's what I want you to know:
- You can ask for a female officer. It may not always be possible, but you have every right to ask.
- If the responding officer dismisses you, ask for a supervisor. If that fails, call the department and ask for the chief, or file a complaint.
- Ask for the officer's name, badge number, and the report number before they leave.
- Tell them everything, especially strangulation, threats to kill, weapons, and stalking. Use those exact words.
- Ask to be connected with a victim advocate. Many departments and prosecutors' offices have them.
- Get your own copy of the report, and correct anything that's wrong in writing.
- Bring your evidence: photos, videos, texts, and your log.
You shouldn't have to fight this hard to be protected. But until the system changes, you are your own best advocate, and an experienced domestic violence advocate can stand beside you.
Don't protect him from the police
Many of us have done it. The police show up, and we downplay what happened. We say it was a misunderstanding. We protect him. People in these relationships often change their own behavior to make the abuser look good. That instinct is part of the bond, but it doesn't serve you. If the police are coming to your home because of your relationship, that isn't normal. And one violent incident is enough to take seriously.
The law is slowly catching up. Strangulation is now a felony in every state (WCPO). Coercive control, the pattern of domination without physical violence, is another story. Hawaii has made it a crime, but most states that address it do so only in civil settings, such as protective orders and custody decisions. In 2026, Colorado joined California, Hawaii, and Connecticut with coercive control provisions in family law (Colorado HB26-1309). In most places, the law still looks for bruises. Document everything anyway; see Survival Tools in Your Toolkit.
The system will not save you in time
I wish I could tell you that a protective order, a police report, or a judge will keep you safe. Sometimes they do. Too often they don't. Orders get violated, police treat coercive control as a "domestic dispute," and courts still look for bruises. None of that is your failure. It's his choice and the system's failure. But it means your strongest protection comes early, in the first weeks, when walking away costs you nothing. That's why this book keeps asking you to be discerning from the very beginning. Not because it's your job to avoid being chosen, but because some men choose their target long before she knows they exist, and the earliest red flags are the cheapest ones to act on.
Chapter 33: No Contact
No contact is the strongest tool you have. It removes his access to you and his supply of your attention and reactions.
That means blocking his number, his email, and his social media. It means not checking his profiles, not asking mutual friends about him, and not answering "just one" message. Every bit of contact keeps the trauma bond alive and gives him a way back in. Contact can also provoke him, especially right after you leave.
Expect hoovering. Named after the vacuum, it's his attempt to suck you back in: the begging, the promises, the sudden sweetness, the crisis that only you can help with, the friends he sends to plead his case. He may threaten, guilt-trip, or claim he's changed. None of that is new. It's the reconciliation stage of the cycle, and it's how he got you back before.
Psychologist Ramani Durvasula describes two main forms: the love-bomb hoover, built on charm and flattery, and the guilt hoover. Watch the calendar, too. Birthdays, holidays, and anniversaries are prime time, and so are the "I miss you" texts. She explains that these messages are usually an attempt to pull you back, not a sign of self-awareness or a wish to repair anything (Durvasula, It's Not You, 2024).
It works for a reason. He's the source of the pain, and he's also the source of the relief. Your nervous system learns to crave the relief, which keeps you bonded to the person causing the harm. Getting free means finding relief somewhere else, and learning to sit with the discomfort until you do. Boundaries won't feel good at first. They aren't supposed to. If you slip and answer the text, that isn't failure. Forgive yourself, recalibrate, and hold the line again. Writing it down in your flag notepad helps you see the pattern next time.
If full no contact isn't possible because of kids, court, or shared property, go gray rock: boring, brief, and in writing. Use BIFF replies, keep everything documented, and let an attorney or advocate handle anything you can. Survival Tools in Your Toolkit explains gray rock and BIFF in detail.
He treats your no-contact as a negotiation
You tell him plainly not to contact you. You block him. And he tests the boundary anyway: a question about some account, an invitation to dinner, an announcement that he's coming by to do a chore. Every contact is a test of whether your boundary will hold. Don't respond. Document every attempt, with dates. If he shows up at your home after you've told him not to, treat it as a safety issue. Call the police if you feel unsafe, and talk to an advocate, because a documented pattern can support an order of protection.
Stalking is a warning sign, not a nuisance
Criminal behavioral analyst Laura Richards describes stalking and coercive control as a killing that happens slowly, one piece at a time, which is why the history of a case matters so much (NewsNation).
When he keeps crossing the lines you've drawn after you leave, by showing up, calling from new numbers, driving by, tracking your location, contacting your friends and family, or "checking on" your house, that's stalking. It's a crime in every state, and it's far more common than most people realize. Nearly 1 in 3 U.S. women (31.2%) have been stalked at some point in their lives (CDC NISVS 2016/2017, via VAWnet), and more than half of all stalking victims are stalked by a current or former partner (SPARC). It's also one of the strongest warning signs there is. In a study of women killed by their partners, 76% had been stalked by him in the year before they died, and 85% of women who survived an attempt on their lives had been stalked (McFarlane et al., 1999, Homicide Studies). Remember the New South Wales review in Chapter 31, too. Almost three in four men stalked their former partner after the breakup. Stalking rarely comes alone, either. Among women stalked by a current or former partner, 81% had also been physically assaulted by him, and 31% had been sexually assaulted by him (Tjaden and Thoennes, 1998, Stalking in America, National Institute of Justice). A review of the research found that stalking roughly triples the risk of being killed by a partner (Spencer and Stith, 2018, Trauma, Violence, & Abuse).
Stalking and guns often go together. Among women whose abusive partner had threatened them with a gun, 76% had also been stalked by him (Logan and Lynch, 2018, Violence and Victims). Men who killed their partner with a gun were twice as likely to have stalked her first (Rai et al., 2020, Journal of Family Violence). And women stalked by a partner who owned a gun were four times as likely to have him threaten their pets (Logan and Landhuis, 2022, Behavioral Sciences & the Law). If he's stalking you and he has access to a gun, tell your advocate and the police both (SPARC, Stalking and Firearms).
Things to expect after you leave
Expect him to test every boundary you set. Expect contact from new numbers and new accounts, and messages sent through friends, family, or his kids. Expect him to show up where you are, or to drive by. Expect hoovering around birthdays and holidays, sudden crises only you can fix, and promises that he's changed. Expect a smear campaign, and expect some people to believe it. And expect the first three months to be the most dangerous, even if he never laid a hand on you before (Chapter 31). None of this means you did something wrong. It means the boundary is working, and he doesn't like it.
What to do:
- Keep a stalking log: date, time, place, what he did, any witnesses, and photos, screenshots, or footage. The Stalking Prevention, Awareness, and Resource Center (SPARC) offers free documentation logs at stalkingawareness.org.
- Don't respond, not even to tell him to stop again. You've already said it. Every reply shows him the line can move.
- Save everything, including voicemails and messages from new numbers or new accounts.
- Tell people: your workplace, your neighbors, and your friends, so they know what he looks like and what he drives.
- Report it, and ask an advocate about a protective order. A documented pattern is what makes the case. Most victims never do. In 2019, only 29% of stalking victims reported it to police, and the most common reason was that it didn't seem important enough. Yet 67% feared being killed or physically hurt (Bureau of Justice Statistics, Stalking Victimization, 2019). Many also feared it would never stop (58%) or that they'd lose their job, friends, or freedom (62%) (SPARC).
- Change your patterns: vary your routes and routines, and check your phone and car for trackers (see Tech safety in Survival Tools).
- Take it seriously, even when it seems harmless. Stalking is one of the factors on the Danger Assessment for a reason (Chapter 27).
No contact protects you, and it's the space where you finally get to heal.
Part VIII: Rebuilding
For years, I woke up in the middle of the night zinging with cortisol, my jaw aching from grinding my teeth, exhausted before the day even started. I was always on. What I've learned is that a good day can be simple. No drama. No dread. No cloud. Moving my body, quiet time, the people and things I love. That's what safety looks like. This part is about getting yours back.
You leave a trauma bond broken. This part is about putting yourself back together: your body, your mind, your relationships, and your life.
Chapter 34: The Body Keeps the Score
My body kept score long before my mind admitted anything. I couldn't sleep. I gained weight. My hair fell out. I developed an autoimmune condition. I was exhausted all the time, and some days I could barely function.
I'm not alone in that. The CDC has found that women who experienced rape, stalking, or partner violence were more likely to report frequent headaches, chronic pain, trouble sleeping, and poor physical and mental health (CDC NISVS). Coercive control specifically is linked to PTSD and depression (Lohmann et al., 2024). And research links childhood adversity and stress-related disorders like PTSD to a higher risk of autoimmune disease (Dube et al., 2009, Psychosomatic Medicine; Song et al., 2018, JAMA).
Sometimes the lost sleep isn't an accident. Sleep deprivation is one of the oldest coercion tactics there is; Biderman's Chart of Coercion calls it induced exhaustion (Chapter 23). Domestic violence advocates describe abusers who keep a partner from going to bed, turn on the lights and pull off the covers, wake her over and over, or punish her for falling asleep, because an exhausted woman can't think clearly or make decisions (DomesticShelters.org). A partner who starts fights late at night or makes noise while you're trying to sleep, after you've told him your sleep matters, is wearing you down. Protect your sleep like it's part of your safety plan, because it is.
Psychiatrist Bessel van der Kolk, whose book gave this chapter its title, argues that trauma isn't stored only as memory; it lives in the nervous system. His team tested yoga in a randomized trial with 64 women whose chronic PTSD hadn't improved with other treatment. After ten weekly classes, 52% of the women in the yoga group no longer met the criteria for PTSD, compared with 21% in the comparison group (van der Kolk et al., 2014, Journal of Clinical Psychiatry). He also points to EMDR, Internal Family Systems, and safe relationships as paths to healing (see Therapies to ask about). So when I say yoga became part of my own recovery, there's research behind it.
Living with chronic fear keeps your stress response switched on, and the body pays for it. Healing has to include the body, not just the mind: sleep, real food, movement that feels good, medical care, and a doctor who knows what you've been through. Rest is medicine, not a luxury.
Chapter 35: Healing in Community
I didn't heal alone, and you don't have to either.
Support groups for narcissistic abuse and betrayal trauma gave me people who understood without explanation. I didn't have to defend myself, prove anything, or explain why I stayed. They just knew. CoDA (Co-Dependents Anonymous) helped me look at my own patterns of over-functioning and caretaking. Prodependence Anonymous helped in a different way, because it sees the urge to love and support a struggling partner as human, not as a pathology. That mattered to me. I didn't need another label telling me I was sick for loving someone.
Therapy matters, too, especially with a therapist who understands trauma and abuse. A good trauma therapist can help you process what happened, calm your nervous system, and change the patterns that kept you stuck. And it's not just about feeling better. In one study of 150 women with PTSD after interpersonal trauma, those whose symptoms improved with cognitive processing therapy had a lower risk of later partner violence (Iverson et al., 2011).
Online communities can help, too. In forums for survivors, women post what's happening, and strangers who've lived it call it what it is. I've read accounts from women who said those strangers' replies were what finally helped them see the relationship wouldn't change, and that they reread those comments in the hard days after leaving. It's the same thing my group did for me. Hearing your own story in someone else's words lets you see it from the outside. Anonymous forums and AI tools are support, not a substitute for a therapist or advocate who knows you and your situation.
Find your people. Online meetings make it possible even if you can't leave the house. You'll find a list in Where to Talk, at the back of the book.
Chapter 36: Earned Security
Your attachment style isn't a life sentence. Researchers call it "earned security" when someone with an insecure start develops secure ways of relating as an adult.
The marker is being able to tell your own story clearly, without drowning in it or shutting down. Not pretending it didn't hurt, and not being swallowed by it every time. That's what this book is, and it took years of therapy, groups, and honest friends to get here.
Earned security grows in safe relationships of every kind: a good therapist, a steady friend, a support group, a partner who stays calm. Each time someone shows up consistently, your nervous system learns that love doesn't have to hurt.
Part of earning security is learning to tolerate safe love without calling it boring. The first time a calm, kind person treats you well, you may feel restless, suspicious, or flat. What you're feeling is the absence of fear, not a lack of chemistry. Give it time.
Reparent yourself
Earned security starts with giving yourself what you didn't get as a child. Therapists call it reparenting. It means treating the little girl inside you the way a loving parent would: keeping her safe, listening when she's scared, setting limits for her, and never again handing her over to someone who hurts her. When the old panic rises, ask her what she needs, and then give it to her. Rest. Comfort. A boundary. A walk away from someone who's frightening her.
If you have trauma, you need to be especially vigilant, not of every man, but of the old pull toward what feels familiar. And if you have a lot to give, you need to be extra careful about who receives it. Big hearts attract takers. Your generosity is a gift. Protect it like one.
Know your attachment style, and his
One of the most protective things you can do is understand how you attach, and how he does. Psychiatrist Amir Levine and psychologist Rachel Heller made adult attachment research accessible in their book Attached. Here are the four styles:
- Secure: comfortable with closeness and with independence. Trusts easily, communicates directly, doesn't play games.
- Anxious: craves closeness and fears abandonment. Reads every delay as rejection and works hard to keep the connection.
- Avoidant: values independence above closeness. Pulls away when things get intimate or emotional.
- Disorganized (sometimes called fearful-avoidant): wants closeness and fears it at the same time. This is mine, and it's the one most tied to childhood trauma.
Anxious and disorganized women often get caught in what's sometimes called the anxious-avoidant trap. The more he pulls away, the harder she chases, and the chase feels like love. Abusers don't have to understand attachment theory to use it. They just learn that withdrawing makes you work harder.
Know his triggers, but don't make them your job
It helps to notice what sets him off, not so you can tiptoe around it forever, but so you can see the pattern clearly. For mine, it was being corrected, being told what to do, being caught in a lie, and holidays and trips. Once I saw that, I understood that his explosions weren't about the little things. They were about his fragile ego. But knowing his triggers is information, not a to-do list. Managing a grown man's triggers is hypervigilance, and it was never love.
Does he know yours, and what does he do with them?
This question matters just as much. A safe partner learns your triggers and handles them with care. If he knows you fear abandonment, he reassures you. If he knows criticism cuts deep, he's gentle. An abuser learns your triggers and uses them. He goes silent because he knows silence terrifies you. He threatens to leave because he knows you'll chase. He attacks your character because he knows exactly where you're already ashamed.
Chapter 37: New Selection Criteria
Your empathy, your conscientiousness, and your capacity to love are superpowers. Now you get to choose who receives them.
How you stop being a target
Research on revictimization points to the same things this book is built on:
- Heal the trauma, because it dulls your alarm. In a study that followed abused women over time, emotional numbing, the PTSD symptom that shuts your feelings down, was the strongest predictor of being abused again (Krause, Kaltman, Goodman and Dutton, 2006, Journal of Traumatic Stress). And women whose PTSD improved with treatment had a lower risk of later partner violence (Iverson et al., 2011; see Chapter 35).
- Regulate your body, because a flooded nervous system reads danger late. In a study of 714 university women, those with a history of sexual victimization waited longer to get out of a risky situation in a realistic scenario, and difficulty regulating emotions explained much of that delay (Walsh, DiLillo and Messman-Moore, 2012, Journal of Interpersonal Violence). The regulation tools in Chapter 16 and Survival Tools are how you get your early warning system back.
- Learn to name risk and act on it early. In a randomized trial with nearly 900 first-year university women, a program that taught women to assess risk from men they knew, push past the emotional barriers to admitting danger, and respond with verbal and physical self-defense cut completed rapes nearly in half over the next year, from 9.8% to 5.2% (Senn et al., 2015, New England Journal of Medicine). Recognizing danger early is how you protect yourself.
- Hold boundaries from the first week. Discernment means watching what he does with your first small no (Chapter 11), not waiting for proof after you're attached.
The common thread is this. You can't control whether a predator notices you. You can shorten the time between his first red flag and your exit.
My old selection criteria were chemistry, intensity, and potential. Those three words describe almost every abuser I've known. My new criteria are behavior, consistency, and time.
Look for repair after conflict, where he comes back, owns his part, and makes it right. Look for accountability without prompting. Look for words that match actions over months, not days. Look for a man who can take input, hear criticism, and accept a small no without sulking. Look for friends and family who've known him a long time and still respect him. And notice whether you feel calm around him, like yourself, and free to be honest.
Is he self-aware? Has he done the work?
"I've been to therapy" sounds like a green flag, and sometimes it is. But as Chapter 22 shows, therapy can turn a man into a more skilled manipulator. Therapy alone proves nothing. What matters is whether it changed how he behaves.
So how do you tell? You can't read his mind, but you can ask good questions early and listen closely to the answers:
- "What did you learn about yourself in therapy?" Listen for I statements about his own patterns: "I learned I shut down when I feel criticized, and I'm working on staying in the conversation." Be wary if the answers are about everyone else: his ex, his parents, his boss.
- "What went wrong in your last relationship, what was your part, and what did you learn about yourself?" A self-aware man can name his part without being prompted and without making his ex the villain.
- "What's something you're still working on?" Self-aware people know their growth edges. "Nothing, really" is a red flag.
- "Tell me about a recent disagreement where you didn't get your way." You're listening for whether he can accept a no, from a boss, a friend, an ex, without resentment or revenge. Then watch what happens the first time you tell him no.
- "What was your parents' relationship like when you were growing up?" Our first model of love shapes how we attach. A hard childhood isn't a red flag on its own, and plenty of men from violent homes never abuse anyone. What matters is whether he can look at it honestly, or whether the story doesn't add up.
- "How do you handle it when you're wrong?" Then watch what actually happens the first time he is.
And then watch his behavior over time, because insight without change is just a better script. Does what he says about himself match what he does? When you give him feedback, does he get curious or defensive? Does he use therapy words to understand himself, or to win arguments and label you? Has he done steady, long-term work, or did he go to therapy only during crises, or because someone made him?
Reflective, reflexive, or performing?
I've learned a simple way to size someone up. When something goes wrong, or when you bring him a concern, which of these does he do?
- Reflective: he pauses, thinks about his own part, and learns. "You're right, I did that. Let me think about why, and what I'll do differently." His insight shows up later in changed behavior.
- Reflexive: he reacts on autopilot: defending, blaming, exploding, shutting down. There's no gap between what he feels and what he does. Everything is about protecting himself in the moment.
- Performing: he says exactly the right thing, with the right words and maybe even the right therapy language, but nothing changes. It's impression management, not reflection. The audience might be you, his family, or a counselor.
Mine was reflexive at home and performing in public. A man can learn to fake reflection, but he can't fake it for long. Give it time, and watch which one shows up when he's tired, stressed, or caught.
Self-awareness looks like accountability in action. The real measure is how he treats you when he's stressed, wrong, or not getting his way, not how well he talks about himself.
Guard your drink
On a date, watch your drink being poured, keep it with you, and don't accept one you didn't see made. If you suddenly feel far more drunk than you should, tell someone you trust and get somewhere safe. If something happens, go to the hospital (see "When he drugs you" in Chapter 26).
Wait on sex, and make it on your terms
I want to say this plainly, woman to woman. Your body is yours, and sharing it is your choice. But know what sex does inside you before you decide. Oxytocin is released in both men and women during sex; in a 2025 study of couples, it rose in both partners in the hour afterward (Denes et al., Archives of Sexual Behavior). It can bond you to someone quickly, sometimes before you know who he really is. Your bonding system doesn't wait for him to earn your trust. Researchers still debate how differently men and women respond, but here's what I know from experience and from the women I've talked to. You can wake up attached to a man who isn't attached to you at all. You can't sex your way into a man's heart.
For a predator, sex can be the goal, not the beginning. If he isn't bonded, he may get what he wanted and disappear, ghost you, or turn cold and make you chase him. And once you're bonded, it's that much harder to see the red flags clearly.
So wait. I think of the first ninety days as a testing period, not a honeymoon. Is he safe? Does he lie? Is he financially responsible? Can he take a no? Does he know what boundaries are? Is he kind to children and animals? Share your body when the relationship is defined, or when you've set your own terms, not his. Let him show you over time that he's consistent, honest, and kind. Watch how he handles waiting. A man who's really interested in you will respect your pace. A man who pressures, guilts, sulks, or disappears when you say "not yet" has just told you exactly who he is.
Treat it like an interview
In the early weeks, you aren't auditioning for him. He's interviewing for access to your life. Ask about his past, probe gently, and look into his background. Notice the basics, too. Does he have manners? Values? How does he fit in at work, and in his own family? How does he talk about his children, and is he actually present for them? Does he use money and gifts to buy affection instead of showing up? In many states, court records are free to search online. Some states' online systems also show full orders of protection, but requests that were never granted usually aren't posted, and common names can match strangers, so confirm before you conclude anything. A past doesn't guarantee a future. In a national study of young adults, about 30% of those who were physically violent in one relationship were violent again in the next, and the more often the violence happened before, the more likely it was to continue (Whitaker, Le and Niolon, 2010, Journal of Interpersonal Violence). But a history of frequent violence is a warning you don't ignore.
Watch the first boundary push, not the charm
First impressions are where men like this do their best work. In one study, people with narcissistic traits were rated more likable at first sight, and the traits that do the most damage over time, exploitativeness and entitlement, were the ones that came across as most attractive in that first meeting. Much of that early appeal came from surface cues, like flashier clothing and a more confident manner (Back, Schmukle and Egloff, 2010, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology). So don't trust the spark. Trust behavior. Often within the first few interactions, he'll do something you don't like, push a little past a boundary, or step outside your values to see what you'll do. He may also mirror you, suddenly sharing all your interests, to build intensity fast. That first push is your information.
Walk away at the first deception
A man who lies to your face in the first weeks is showing you how the rest will go. You don't need three lies to establish a pattern; the first one is information. And if he's sleeping with other women while he's with you, he isn't only betraying you. He's putting your health at risk, exposing you to sexually transmitted infections you never agreed to. Cheating itself isn't a crime. But in many states, knowingly exposing a partner to an infection you know you have, without telling them, is, and it can also be grounds for a civil lawsuit. The laws vary by state. Either way, it's one more reason his secrets are your business.
The bright line
He doesn't get your body. He doesn't get access to your life. He doesn't get into your home. Not until you know who he is.
Discernment as you get older
Later in life, more of the men you meet are coming out of past relationships. That isn't a red flag on its own. But look hard at why each one ended, how he talks about his exes, and whether he takes any responsibility for his part.
Capable women and dating down
Too many men can't handle a capable woman. I'd love to call that my bitterness talking, but it's patriarchy and misogyny, and the research backs up what I lived. Studies of "status mismatch" in couples have found that when a woman earns more or has more education than her male partner, her risk of abuse can go up, not down. In one Norwegian study, women who earned more than two-thirds of the household income had almost seven times the risk of experiencing both psychological and physical abuse compared with women who earned less than a third (Kilden). A study across the European Union found that women who earned more than their partners were more likely to report partner violence (van Vugt and Pop, 2022). Findings vary from country to country, but the pattern shows up again and again.
So the old advice to "date down" and find a man who'll be grateful to have you can backfire badly. A man who feels smaller than you may try to make you smaller to feel better.
But the answer goes beyond finding a man with more money or a bigger title. You need a man who is secure enough to share power. Research from Peru found that even when women out-earned or out-educated their partners, couples who made decisions together had a lower risk of physical violence (PMC). That matches Gottman's finding about accepting influence. If you're a high-capacity woman, you need a man who can stand beside that capacity without feeling threatened by it: a man who's proud of your wins, can take your input, and doesn't need you to shrink.
Women with choices are noticing the imbalance. In 2023, the U.S. Surgeon General declared loneliness a national epidemic (Our Epidemic of Loneliness and Isolation, 2023), and yet women are increasingly choosing to stay single. Pew found that 61% of single men were looking for a relationship, compared with 38% of single women; after 40, 71% of single women weren't looking at all (Pew Research Center, 2020). Many are holding out for an equal partnership, and they're right to.
Go slow. Watch what he does, not what he says. If he's the real thing, he'll still be there when you're ready.
Chapter 38: Remember You
What recovery looks like
Healing isn't a straight line, but it does happen. Researchers who reviewed studies of women after leaving abusive partners found that, on average, depression and PTSD symptoms eased over time once they were out (Anderson and Saunders, 2003, Trauma, Violence, & Abuse). Some women go further than recovering. Psychologists Richard Tedeschi and Lawrence Calhoun call it post-traumatic growth. After the struggle, many people report a deeper appreciation for life, closer relationships, a new sense of personal strength, new possibilities they never would have pursued, and a changed sense of what matters (Tedeschi and Calhoun, 1996, Journal of Traumatic Stress). Growth doesn't mean what happened was good. It means it doesn't get the last word.
Why leaving doesn't feel better yet
You got out, and you expected relief. Instead you may feel worse. You grieve him. You grieve the person you thought he was. You stay busy so you don't have to feel it. It's easy to mistake distraction and busyness for real healing. The grief is real, and it says nothing about whether you made the right choice. You're detoxing from the relief he used to supply. It passes, but only if you let yourself feel it.
Expect good days and bad days. Expect the pull to go back to show up when you're tired or lonely, and to fade. Expect your body to take longer than your mind; the jumpiness and the 3 a.m. wakeups are often the last to go. And expect to meet yourself again. The woman you were before him, and the woman you're becoming, are still in there.
He took the vacations. He took the weekends. He took my will to do anything at all. By the end I was buried in an exhausting depression. I was lost, I was broken, and I was literally bruised.
And then I chose myself.
I had to detach from him, and I had to decenter him, because he was sucking the life force out of me. He fed on the drama he created, and then he'd point at me: You're a psycho. You're crazy. You're insecure. You're jealous. But I wasn't the insecure one. He was an insecure misogynist who couldn't stand being around an independent, capable woman, so he beat me down until I was smaller. That's part of the hook, too. Not love.
That's the difference between a breakup and a trauma bond that I described in Chapter 31: you don't leave with yourself intact. So getting him out of my house was only half the work. The other half was getting him out of the center of my life and finding out who was still left.
And I have to be honest. While I was in it, I wasn't dedicated to my own life either. I wasn't centering myself. I wasn't consistently going to the gym or doing my yoga or protecting my peace. I was too busy reacting to whatever drama or chaos he was going through that week. What I needed was to let go of his chaos and take care of myself anyway.
But you can't get better in the mess while you're still in it. You can't heal in the same place that's hurting you. And you can't win a fight with someone who thrives on fighting. There's an old saying about never wrestling with a pig in the mud, because you both get dirty and the pig likes it. Another is even older. Don't argue with a fool. Every time I tried to reason with him, I ended up covered in his mud, and he walked away energized.
Analysis paralysis
Trauma can turn you into a researcher. You keep trying to understand why, because there's nowhere to put the blame. So you read, and research, and analyze, and it swallows nearly all of your mental space. Everything goes toward the relationship and nothing goes toward you. It pulls you in like a tornado. And the analysis itself becomes another way of staying connected to him. At some point, understanding him has to stop being the project. You are the project.
Women online have a word for this now. They call it decentering. It means you stop organizing your life around a man, whether he's in it, gone, or not even there yet, and you put yourself back in the middle. Every hour you spend analyzing him, monitoring him, or waiting on him is energy taken from your own life. You are where your energy needs to go. Decentering him is how you reclaim it.
So I want you to ask yourself the questions I had to ask myself. What do you love? What did you love before him? What did you stop doing because he didn't like it, or because there was no room left for you? What makes you lose track of time? What makes your life feel rich, not just survivable?
For me, it's the gym, my yoga mat, a class, the park, walking my dogs, meditation, and writing it all down. It's the peace I feel when I'm taking care of my own body and mind.
The circle of safety
I think of the people in my life in circles. Some I keep close. Others, especially family who aren't always safe, I can pull in when it feels okay, like for the holidays, and keep at arm's length when they're not being safe. People don't like being called out, and I know how hard it is to change; I've been trying to change myself for decades. I'm not telling you to throw people away. But you don't have to hold anyone close to your chest who keeps hurting you. That's easier with family than with a partner who lives in your home, which is exactly why you need boundaries, separation, and a safe space of your own.
Expect pushback when you change
Psychologist Harriet Lerner, drawing on family systems theory, says anger is a signal that something needs to change, often a boundary, and that families resist change. When one person stops playing her part, the others push her to "change back," with guilt, threats, ultimatums, or withdrawal (Lerner, The Dance of Anger). Her advice is to change your own steps calmly and hold steady through it. The pushback is a sign you're changing the pattern, not proof you're wrong. Family systems theory also warns that total fusion and angry cutoff both keep you tied to the system; the goal is to stay clear about who you are, whatever distance you choose.
Distance from family rarely happens in one clean break. Communication researcher Kristina Scharp describes estrangement as an ongoing process that varies in degree, so people are more or less estranged rather than simply in or out, and it's usually rooted in serious problems like abuse, neglect, or substance use (The Conversation). If you pull back, come close, and pull back again, you're not failing. That's how it usually goes.
Choosing yourself means getting uncomfortable. You have to walk through the loneliness and make it your time of repair and nourishment: doing what you love, building community with other women, finding hobbies. Ask yourself where you go to get healthy and do good things. Maybe that's even where you'll meet someone healthy. Take care of yourself first. And practice detaching: from the outcome, from the future he promised, from the charm and charisma. None of it was real. It was a facade.
Start small. Go back to one thing you used to love. Take yourself to dinner. Sign up for the class. Call the friend you drifted away from. Spend a Saturday doing exactly what you want and nothing for anyone else. Your nervous system needs proof that your life is safe and that it belongs to you, and that proof comes one ordinary good day at a time.
Date yourself
The hard things count, like the gym when you'd rather stay in bed or a night out with friends who would notice if you disappeared. But so do the simple things. The smell of fresh coffee in a quiet kitchen. A long bubble bath. A good book with no one interrupting you. They nourish your soul after years of running on empty, and they prove to you that peace is something you're allowed to have.
Learn what you like when no one else is deciding for you. Live your life unapologetically, and stop tolerating disrespect from anyone, including the voice in your own head. You don't have to become a better version of yourself to deserve love. You're good enough the way you are, flaws and all.
Call it the cure, not selfishness. A woman with a full life is much harder to isolate, much harder to convince she's nothing without him, and much less likely to mistake a man's attention for oxygen. When you know what you love and you're living for it, the next man who tries to become the center of your world will find the spot already taken.
It's yours. This is your life.
Chapter 39: Red Flags and Green Flags
For most of my life, I knew plenty about red flags and almost nothing about green ones. I could spot danger in hindsight, but I didn't know what safe looked like, so safe felt unfamiliar. This chapter puts both side by side, so you can recognize the bad early and learn to trust the good.
A few rules first. One red flag doesn't always mean abuse, but a pattern does, and some red flags, like strangulation, threats to kill, or a gun paired with rage, mean danger right now (go back to Chapter 27). Green flags only count when they're consistent over months, not days. Anyone can perform kindness for a few dates. And your body is part of the evidence. If you feel anxious, confused, or like you're walking on eggshells, that's a flag, even if you can't name why.
Early on
| Red flag | Green flag |
|---|---|
| Too good, too fast: soulmate talk, marriage, and future plans within weeks | Interest that builds steadily at a pace you're comfortable with |
| Love bombing: constant contact, grand gestures, "I've never felt this way" | Consistent attention that doesn't overwhelm you |
| Mirrors you: likes everything you like, agrees with everything | Has his own opinions, interests, and life |
| Favors you didn't ask for, then acts like you owe him | Helps freely and doesn't keep score |
| Bold with every woman in the room | Interested in getting to know you over time |
| Promises you didn't ask for: "I promise I'm a good guy" | Doesn't need to promise; his track record speaks |
| Pushes past your first "no," even about something small | Hears a small no and simply adjusts |
| Hides big facts (kids, debts, an ex, a record) until you're attached | Tells you the important things early |
Honesty
| Red flag | Green flag |
|---|---|
| Lies about small things for no reason | Tells the truth even when it's inconvenient |
| Phone always on him, wiped, locked, or hidden; secret accounts | Open about his life without being asked |
| Stories that change, or come with too many details | Stories that stay the same no matter how you ask |
| Hides you from his social media or his people | Proud to include you in his life |
| Sudden makeover (new clothes, gym every day) alongside new secrecy | Changes he makes are open, and you're part of them |
| Future faking and broken promises | Small promises kept, consistently |
Conflict and accountability
| Red flag | Green flag |
|---|---|
| Can't take input, criticism, or correction | Accepts influence: "Good point, let's try that" |
| Contempt: eye-rolling, sneering, mockery, name-calling | Respect, even when he's angry |
| Stonewalls, then blames your reaction | Takes a break if he needs one, then comes back to talk |
| Blames everyone else: you, his ex, his boss, his childhood | Owns his part without being prompted |
| Apologizes for the same things over and over | Apologizes once, makes repair, and the behavior changes |
| Polices your tone: "You should have just said it nicer" | Hears the message, even when it isn't delivered perfectly |
| Shows no curiosity when you say you're hurt | Asks what happened and what you need |
| Excuses gawking, flirting with servers, or studying other women's photos as "just a guy thing" | Respects you whether or not you're watching |
| Keeps a running tally of your failures | Owns his part without keeping score |
| Calls you "crazy," "psycho," "jealous," or "insecure" when you notice something | Takes your concerns seriously, even when he disagrees |
| Uses therapy words to win arguments | Uses what he's learned to understand himself |
Respect and control
| Red flag | Green flag |
|---|---|
| Isolates you from friends and family | Encourages your relationships and your independence |
| Monitors your phone, time, or location | Trusts you without needing to track you |
| Controls or comments on what you wear | Compliments you and trusts you, whatever you wear |
| Stares at, rates, or compares other women in front of you | His attention stays with you |
| Uses your trauma, secrets, or triggers against you | Holds what you share with care |
| Threatened by your success; calls you "bossy" or "cold" | Celebrates your wins and wants you to grow |
| Drives recklessly, especially when you ask him to slow down | Slows down when you ask |
Money, substances, and responsibility
| Red flag | Green flag |
|---|---|
| Always broke; borrows and doesn't repay; lives off you | Pays his share and keeps his word about money |
| Something comes before you: alcohol, drugs, porn, other women | You're a priority, and he's honest about his struggles |
| Pressures you to drink or use | Respects your choices |
| Uses a diagnosis as an excuse | Knows himself and manages what affects others |
| Wants a mother, not a partner | Takes care of himself and shares the load |
Sex and consent
| Red flag | Green flag |
|---|---|
| Pressures, guilts, or pushes for sex | Asks, listens, and accepts no without sulking |
| Wants you drunk, tired, or vulnerable | Wants you present and enthusiastic |
| Treats sex as something he's owed, even in marriage | Treats consent as ongoing, every time |
| Secretive sexual activity with others online | Honest about his values, and they match yours |
His past and his people
| Red flag | Green flag |
|---|---|
| Every ex was "crazy," and nothing was his fault | Talks about past relationships honestly and owns his part |
| Still obsessed with an ex, or in secretive contact | Clear, respectful boundaries with his past |
| Can't talk about his childhood, or the story doesn't add up | Reflects honestly on where he came from |
| Friends who've known him a long time are wary of him | Long-time friends and family who respect him |
| Charming in public, cruel in private | The same man everywhere |
Inside you
| Red flag | Green flag |
|---|---|
| A rush followed by a crash; constant anxiety | Calm, even when things are exciting |
| Walking on eggshells, managing his moods | Free to be honest and to have a bad day |
| You're doing things you never would have done before | You feel more like yourself, not less |
| You keep a mental list of excuses for him | You don't need excuses, because his behavior speaks for itself |
| Your friends and family are worried | The people who love you are relieved and happy for you |
Print these pages. Keep them where you'll see them. And when you meet someone new, let the green flags earn your trust slowly. The right person will be glad you took your time.
Conclusion: Writing a Different Ending
So, why didn't I just leave, and why me? Because I was the type, and he could see it. Because my history made his tests feel familiar, and passing them felt like love. Because the relationship met needs I had never named: to be needed, to finally win, to fix what couldn't be fixed. None of that made it my fault. All of it was mine to understand.
So what did I learn about myself? For a long time, I'd have said I was weak. I was blaming myself instead of choosing myself. I was overriding my own values instead of trusting my intuition and my instincts. I was settling for far less than I deserved, and I knew I deserved better. But I've come to see it differently now. I wasn't weak. I was hooked. The hook was everything at once: the shame, the wearing down, the trauma bond, the chemistry, the old childhood script, and a man who knew exactly how to keep pulling the line. It's a pattern. It's control. And the goal is dependence.
These are the lessons I carry now:
- He was conditioning me to override my own senses. I saw the patterns; most of us do, because we're hypervigilant and highly sensitive. I chose to override what I saw, and he worked hard to train me to. Patterns don't lie.
- My intuition was right every time. My body knew before my mind would admit it. The knot in my stomach, the urge to check his phone, the feeling that something was off: that was information, not insecurity. I'll never override it again.
- If I wouldn't do it to him, it's not okay for him to do it to me. I have choice, and I have agency.
- My values are my compass. Every time I did something I never would have done before, it was a warning sign. When I'm crossing my own lines to keep someone, I'm already losing myself.
- Self-blame was a survival skill, not the truth. It kept me feeling in control as a child. As an adult, it only kept me stuck. His choices were his.
- Knowing I deserve better isn't enough. I knew it the whole time. Deserving better only becomes real when I hold boundaries that protect it.
- Choosing myself is a daily practice. Forget one big dramatic exit. It's the gym, the yoga mat, the blocked number, the "no" I don't explain, over and over again.
- The hook can be named, and once it's named, it loses its grip. Every chapter of this book is my way of naming it.
This is what I know now. The men I kept attracting were immature, insecure, manipulative, and exploitative, and what they wanted was power and control over me. The signs are there, early and often. A man who can't take a small no will not take a big one. Leaving is the most dangerous time, so you leave with a plan and with people. And the shame was never yours to carry.
I will never again sit across from a man who serves me lies for dinner, who looks me in the eye and pretends to be something he isn't, who makes me feel bad for who I am because he's insecure. I am not his supply, and I am not his mommy. I won't accept a man putting his hands on me, or driving me to the point of desperation, ever again.
If you remember one thing from this book, let it be this. Tell someone safe. Tell a friend, an advocate, a hotline, a stranger in a support group. Say it even if your voice shakes. And then go back to the woman you were before him, and live for her. My guardian angel didn't get the chance to write a different ending. You still can.
If I could go back, I'd tell my younger self to build her self-respect, because no one else can hand it to her. I'd tell you the same. Center yourself. Prioritize yourself. Never let anyone demean you or hold you down. Be okay with being single, and with boundaries that feel uncomfortable at first. Become so strong that charm and charisma get a man nowhere. The world can be rough, but it can also be beautiful, so find the glimmers, the small moments that tell your body you're safe. Build community. Find your people. My guardian angel and I used to say that people who don't like you for who you are aren't your people, and you let them go. Water your own garden, because what you water grows.
Never give up hope for yourself. You are worthy. Your feelings are valid. I see you. I am you. You are loved, and you are deserving.
Your Toolkit
Everything from this book that you can use today, in one place.
Red and Green Flags
A red flag is something he says or does that signals danger, disrespect, or control. A green flag is something he says or does, again and again, that shows you're safe with him. Both are actions you can see or hear. Neither one is a feeling about who he is, and neither one is his potential.
Start with your own dealbreakers and non-negotiables. Before you judge any one moment, decide where your lines are. Your dealbreakers are the red flags that end it for you, no second chances. Maybe that's lying, watching other women on social media, porn use, or hiding his phone. Your non-negotiables are what you must have, like honesty, respecting your no the first time, and keeping his word. Your values sit underneath both. They're what matters most to you, like honesty, faith, family, kindness, or how money is handled, and a man who doesn't share them will keep crossing your lines. Nobody else gets to set these for you. Write your dealbreakers and values in the notepad below first, then add red and green flags as you notice them.
How to recognize a red flag. Write down exactly what happened, in his exact words, without softening it. Then ask:
If he has put his hands on your neck, hit you, forced sex, or threatened to kill you, that's danger, not a flag to weigh. Go to Lethality Indicators.
How to recognize a green flag. It's quieter, and at first it can even feel boring. Look for:
For every red flag paired with its green flag, see Chapter 39.
Your flag notepad. Tap Add to save a dealbreaker, a value, or a red or green flag as you notice it. Notes save only in this browser, on this device. If he can use your phone or computer, write them somewhere he can't reach instead, and tap Clear all before you close the page.
Are You a Fixer?
Fixers are the women abusers love most, and most of us don't realize we are one. Answer honestly. This isn't a diagnosis. It's a mirror.
If you answered yes to several, you're a fixer. I am too. It's not a flaw; it usually starts as a survival skill, the child who learned that keeping everyone okay kept her safe. But it's exactly what he was scanning for. Chapter 12 explains how this need gets used against you and how to meet it safely. The first step is simple and hard. Let a grown man carry his own life.
What a Boundary Is (and Isn't)
Most of us were never taught what a boundary actually is, so we confuse it with a rule for him, a threat, or a polite request. Here's the plain version, drawn from counselors and advocates who work with this every day. Chapter 11 explains why holding one feels so hard.
The definition. A boundary is a limit you set around your body, your space, your feelings, your money, your time, and your digital life, together with what you will do when someone crosses it. University counseling services describe boundaries as the limits that define safe and acceptable ways for others to treat you, plus your own response when those limits are ignored (University of Edinburgh Student Counselling). The second half is the part most of us skip. A boundary isn't what you say. It's what you do.
A boundary is about you, not him. You can't make another person behave. You can only decide what you'll do. That's what makes a boundary enforceable, and it's why healthy boundaries were never about controlling anyone else (Simply Psychology).
| Request | Boundary | Ultimatum | |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it is | Asking him to do, or stop doing, something | Stating what you will do if something happens | A threat meant to force him to change |
| Example | "Would you lower your voice?" | "If you yell, I'll leave the room." | "Stop yelling or I'm done with you." (said in anger, then not followed through) |
| Who controls the outcome | Him | You | Him |
| Can you enforce it? | No | Yes | Rarely, and he knows it |
Coach Hailey Magee, writing for the Gottman Institute, draws the same line. Requests and ultimatums both depend on the other person's choices, while a boundary depends only on yours. She suggests starting with a request and moving to a boundary when he won't or can't meet it (Gottman Institute). Therapists also note that ultimatums tend to come out of feeling trapped after needs have gone unmet for a long time, and that they're very hard to take back once said in a fight (Psych Central).
The kinds of boundaries.
| Type | What it protects | Sounds like |
|---|---|---|
| Physical | Your body, your home, your personal space | "I need space when we argue. I'm going for a walk." |
| Sexual | Your consent, which you can withdraw at any time, even after saying yes | "No. Not tonight." No explanation required. |
| Emotional | Where your feelings end and his begin | "Your mood is yours to manage. I'm not going to walk on eggshells." |
| Intellectual | Your right to your own opinions | "We can disagree. I'm not changing my mind to keep the peace." |
| Financial | Your income, accounts, credit, and what you lend | "I don't lend money in relationships. My accounts stay in my name." |
| Digital | Your phone, passwords, social media, and privacy | "My phone is private. I don't share passwords." |
| Time and energy | Your hours, your rest, your friendships | "Thursday is my night with my friends. That doesn't change." |
Sources: love is respect; Simply Psychology. Love is respect also makes a point worth repeating. You can change your boundaries at any point in a relationship, and a partner pressuring you to redraw them is not okay.
Signs your boundaries are too weak.
- You feel responsible for his moods.
- You hide your own feelings to manage his.
- You can't always tell which feelings are yours and which are his.
- You say no, then explain, soften, and give in.
- You feel resentful, exhausted, and less and less like yourself.
Signs of a healthy boundary. It's clear and specific. It's said out loud, not hinted at. It's said calmly, without anger or apology. And it's followed through every single time.
Start small. Attachment educator Thais Gibson, founder of the Personal Development School, teaches that the place to start is basic: practice setting one simple boundary, or just saying no. A small no to a safe person builds the muscle you'll need for the bigger ones, and it shows you who respects it.
How to set one. Use this shape: "If ___ happens, I will ___." Then do it, without a debate.
- "If you call me names, I'll end the conversation."
- "If you show up drunk, you won't be coming in."
- "If you lie to me, I'm leaving."
Watch what he does next. His response to your boundary is the test result (Chapter 11). A safe man adjusts. An unsafe man sulks, guilts, punishes, or pushes harder.
Am I Trauma Bonded?
A trauma bond is an attachment built on cycles of harm and relief, very different from ordinary love, and it can hold you long after you know you should go. Psychologist Dee Graham developed a research scale to measure this kind of bond and found it clusters into three groups: the ways you cope with the abuse, the damage it does to you, and a feeling that you can't survive without him (Graham et al., 1995, Violence and Victims). The questions below follow those three groups. Like the fixer quiz, they're a mirror, not a diagnosis.
How you cope with him
What it's doing to you
Love-dependence
If you answered yes to several questions in more than one group, take it seriously, and take this list to a therapist or advocate. For a deeper self-assessment, Patrick Carnes's Betrayal Bond Index appears in his book The Betrayal Bond (1997).
More Self-Assessments
Understanding yourself is part of choosing differently. These assessments can help, but none of them is a diagnosis. Bring your results to a trauma-informed therapist.
- Attachment style. The Experiences in Close Relationships–Revised (ECR-R) questionnaire is one of the most widely used research measures of adult attachment, and free online versions are available, such as the Attachment Style Quiz based on Chris Fraley's ECR-RS. You can read about the full research version on Fraley's lab page. It can help you see whether you lean anxious, avoidant, or secure, or somewhere in between.
- Childhood adversity. The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) questionnaire, from the CDC and Kaiser Permanente study, asks ten questions about what you experienced growing up, including whether you witnessed violence against your mother. The CDC explains ACEs on its About Adverse Childhood Experiences page.
- Complex PTSD. The International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) is a free, validated screening tool for PTSD and complex PTSD. A high score is a reason to talk to a professional, not a label to carry alone.
Signs of Abuse at a Glance
Abuse goes far beyond hitting. It comes in many forms, and most abusive relationships use several at once. Here they are in one place.
| Form | What it can look like |
|---|---|
| Physical | Hitting, shoving, strangling, throwing things at you, blocking a doorway, driving recklessly to scare you |
| Sexual | Pressuring or forcing sex, ignoring your no, sex as payment or punishment, using porn to degrade or compare, drugging you |
| Reproductive coercion | Interfering with birth control, pressuring you to get pregnant or to end a pregnancy |
| Emotional and verbal | Name-calling, constant criticism, humiliation, mocking your trauma, calling you "crazy" or "psycho" |
| Psychological | Gaslighting, DARVO, rewriting history, the silent treatment, threats to leave or to harm himself |
| Threats and intimidation | Threats to hurt you, your pets, or your home; breaking things; showing a weapon |
| Isolation | Cutting you off from friends and family, smearing you, making you choose between him and them |
| Financial | Living off you, running up your credit, controlling or hiding money, sabotaging your job |
| Digital | Hidden accounts, tracking your location, monitoring your phone, demanding your passwords while hiding his |
| Spiritual | Using scripture to demand submission, calling divorce a sin, recruiting church leaders or members to pressure you to stay or stay quiet |
| Using children | Bringing his kids into fights, using them as messengers, threatening custody |
| Covert control | Charm in public and cruelty in private, deniable digs, intermittent kindness that keeps you hoping |
If you see yourself in more than one row, you're not overreacting. Turn to the Coercive Control Checklist next, and if anything involves strangulation, weapons, or threats to kill, go to Chapter 27 and call an advocate.
His Profile at a Glance
Different men, different faces, same blueprint. He might be a pastor, a doctor, a soldier, the local bad boy, the nice guy everyone loves, or the man you met online. The details change. The pattern doesn't. Here's the whole profile from this book in one place.
| He… | What it looks like | Where to read more |
|---|---|---|
| Waits for your vulnerable moment | Shows up when you're stretched thin: after a move, a loss, a breakup, a baby | Chapter 1 |
| Moves fast and mirrors you | Loves everything you love, talks about forever right away, can't wait | Chapter 1 |
| Has a sad story | The hard childhood, the cruel ex, the tears that make you want to save him | Chapter 1 |
| Hides behind a title or an image | The pastor, the coach, the hero, the nice guy; his status buys him trust and cover | Chapters 1 and 21 |
| Lives a double life | Hidden phones and accounts, other women, lies about who he is | Chapters 21 and 26 |
| Needs a caretaker and a bank | Lives off you, wants a mother, not a partner | Chapter 3 |
| Has a fragile ego | A question feels like an attack; your success feels like his failure | Chapter 3 |
| Controls, doesn't "lose control" | Rules, monitoring, money, isolation; the violence serves the control | Chapter 19 |
| "Blacks out" | Says he can't remember what he did, calls it a relapse, needed a "release" | Chapter 22 |
| Is easily made to feel small | Anything that makes him feel inferior or less of a man becomes her fault | Chapters 3 and 22 |
| Uses what you love against you | Your secrets, your money, your kids, your faith | Chapter 19 |
| Rewrites the story | Gaslighting, DARVO, recruiting flying monkeys, calling you "crazy" | Chapters 23 and 24 |
| Can't take no | Rejection triggers punishment: stalking, threats, escalation | Chapters 27 and 33 |
| Gets most dangerous when he's losing control | Separation, pregnancy, or exposure can trigger the worst of it | Chapter 27 |
| Has done it before | You're not the first, and you won't be the last | Chapter 37 |
If he fits more than a few rows, you're not imagining the pattern. Turn to Signs of Abuse at a Glance, and if anything involves strangulation, weapons, or threats to kill, go straight to Lethality Indicators.
Is He Really Changing?
If he's in a program or in therapy and you're deciding whether to stay, measure change by what your life feels like, not by what he says. Project Mirabal, a UK study of domestic violence perpetrator programs led by researchers Liz Kelly and Nicole Westmarland, found that success means much more than the violence stopping. Their six measures:
- Respect and real communication. He listens, and you can disagree without fear.
- Your space for action. You get your voice and your choices back: your friends, your money, your time.
- Safety. You and your children are free from violence and abuse, including the threat of it.
- Safe, shared parenting. He parents without using the children against you.
- His understanding of the harm. He can describe what his abuse did to you and the children, without being prompted.
- Safer childhoods. Your children feel safe, heard, and cared for.
Signs that change is real:
- He names exactly what he did, without minimizing, blaming you, or saying "but."
- He doesn't demand credit, forgiveness, or a timeline for things to go back to normal.
- He accepts the consequences, including your boundaries and your right to leave.
- The change holds for months and years, when he's tired, stressed, drinking, or not getting his way.
- He stops using what he learned in therapy as a weapon.
It's a performance if "I'm going to therapy" is a bargaining chip. He wants credit for showing up. He's sweet when you pull away and back to old behavior when you come close. The blame quietly drifts back to you. And here's the clearest test of all. Are you less afraid of him than you were? If the answer is no, nothing important has changed.
Coercive Control Checklist
Answer yes or no for yourself. These signs come from Evan Stark's work and from Women's Aid, and the examples are from my own life. If you check several, please talk to an advocate.
| Does he... | What it looked like for me |
|---|---|
| Isolate you from friends and family? | Smeared me to friends; turned his kids against me; stalked the places I went, tainting the spots where I'd felt safe |
| Monitor your time, phone, or location? | Hid his phone while demanding to know where I'd been |
| Micromanage your daily life? | Blowups over things that didn't matter |
| Control or exploit money? | Lived off me; rarely paid his share; loans never repaid |
| Degrade or humiliate you? | Called me "insecure," "crazy," and "psycho"; projected his own character flaws onto me |
| Threaten you or himself? | Threatened suicide with a gun; threatened to destroy my home |
| Pressure or force sex? | Sex I didn't consent to, including in my own home |
| Cut you off from help? | Lied about me to the people around him |
| Make you doubt your own memory? | "I told you, you just don't remember" |
| Make you afraid of him? | Planning escape routes in my own home |
Early Screening Tests
No single sign proves abuse, but a cluster is a pattern, and the National Domestic Violence Hotline says even one or two can be a red flag (The Hotline). Use these in the first weeks and months. They're the tests that aren't already in the full list of red and green flags in Chapter 39, so use the two together.
| Ask yourself | Red flag | Green flag | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Can he take a small no? | He sulks, argues, punishes, or smears you | He adjusts without debate | Gavin de Becker, The Gift of Fear (discounting "no") |
| Can he take input? | Gets defensive or angry at suggestions; does the opposite to prove a point | Says "good idea" and means it | Gottman, The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work |
| Does his position make him "safe"? | You trust him because of his title (pastor, coach, leader) instead of his behavior | Trust grows from what he does over time | AP via KCTV5 |
| Does he need fixing? | Constant crises, impulsive choices, no plan, always chasing the next thrill | Manages his own life and asks for help sometimes, not always | Hare PCL-R |
| Does he recruit an audience? | Tells his version to friends and family first; others start treating you differently | Keeps your conflicts private and fair | My own experience |
| Is it getting worse? | Abuse escalates over months and years; the mask slips more often | Conflict stays respectful, and repairs hold | SAFE Project |
| Is he self-aware? | Blames everyone else; uses therapy words as weapons; "nothing" to work on | Names his own patterns, owns his part, and his behavior matches his insight | My own experience |
| Is he reflective, reflexive, or performing? | Reacts defensively on autopilot, or says the right words and nothing changes | Pauses, owns his part, and his behavior changes over time | My own experience |
| Is he attuned to you? | Seems to read you perfectly early on, then goes blank or cold once he has you | Notices how you feel, asks, cares about the answer, and repairs after conflict | Dan Siegel; Edward Tronick |
| How does he handle money and your career? | Pushes you to quit your job, controls the money, calls it "his" | Supports your career and treats money as shared and transparent | The Duluth Model |
| Is he testing your limits? | Small violations wrapped in affection, intrusive early questions | Asks before crossing lines | Ramani Durvasula, Should I Stay or Should I Go? (2015) |
| How does he handle frustration? | Explosive outbursts or mood swings over small things | Can be frustrated and stay respectful | The Hotline |
Safety Plan, Local Help, and Your Own Money
Build your safety plan. A safety plan is a short list of what you'll do before, during, and after a dangerous moment. You don't need a form. Call the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 1-800-799-7233, or text START to 88788, and an advocate will build one with you for free. You can also use the free myPlan app (see Survival Tools). Your plan should answer:
Chapter 32 walks through the whole plan, including your legal rights and dealing with police.
Find help near you.
- The Hotline (1-800-799-7233) can connect you to shelters and programs in your area.
- DomesticShelters.org lets you search for shelters and programs by ZIP code.
- WomensLaw.org explains protective orders and custody state by state, and lists local advocates and legal help.
- 211 (dial or text 211) connects you to local help with housing, food, utilities, and transportation.
- Your county courthouse often has a self-help center or a protective order office that will help you fill out the paperwork for free.
Keep your own money. Money is one of the main reasons women stay, so start protecting yours now, even if you aren't ready to leave.
- Open an account in your name only, at a different bank from his, with paperless statements sent to an email he doesn't know.
- Keep some cash somewhere safe, or with someone you trust.
- Check your credit. All three credit bureaus give free reports every week at AnnualCreditReport.com. Look for accounts or debts you didn't open. A credit freeze stops anyone from opening new credit in your name.
- Change the passwords and PINs on your bank, retirement, and benefit accounts, and remove him as an authorized user.
- Copy your pay stubs, tax returns, and account statements, and keep them with your go bag.
- For free financial help made for survivors, look at the Allstate Foundation's financial empowerment resources and FreeFrom. Many local programs offer the Allstate Foundation's Moving Ahead financial curriculum.
Survival Tools
These are the tools I wish I'd had in a drawer years ago. Some are for staying safe while you're still in it, some are for getting out, and some are for the long, hard months after. Talk them through with an advocate, because your situation is your own.
The go bag. Pack it now, even if you're not sure you'll ever leave. Keep it hidden but easy to grab, or leave it with someone you trust. This list is adapted from the National Domestic Violence Hotline's personal safety plan (The Hotline) and other agency checklists (180 NJ; Mass.gov).
| Category | What to pack |
|---|---|
| Identification | Driver's license, birth certificates (yours and your kids'), Social Security cards, passports |
| Money | Cash, cards in your name only, checkbooks and account information |
| Legal papers | Protective order, lease or deed, car title and registration, insurance papers, marriage, divorce, and custody papers |
| Medical | Medications for you and your kids, medical and school records |
| Evidence | Copies of photos, police reports, medical records, and your abuse log |
| Lifelines | Phone charger, a written list of safe phone numbers, spare house and car keys |
| Daily needs | A change of clothes and toiletries for you and your kids |
| Pets | Food, medications, leash, vet and vaccination records |
| Irreplaceables | Photos and small sentimental items |
Agencies add one caution. Cards and phones can be traced, so turn off location sharing and GPS when you leave, and think about where you use your cards.
Gray rock. When you can't avoid contact, become as interesting as a gray rock. Short answers, no emotion, no personal information, nothing to react to. Abusers feed on your reactions; gray rock starves them. "Yellow rock" is a softer version for co-parenting, neutral and polite but still giving nothing away (DomesticShelters.org). One warning. If he's escalating and you feel unsafe, don't try to manage his emotions with any technique. Just get somewhere safe.
BIFF replies. For texts and emails you have to answer, attorney and therapist Bill Eddy created BIFF: Brief, Informative, Friendly, Firm (High Conflict Institute). One short paragraph. Facts only. A civil tone. A clear end. No defending your character, no relitigating the past. For example, if he writes, "You ruined everything, like you always do, and now you won't even let me get my tools," a BIFF reply looks like this: "Thanks for letting me know. Your tools will be on the porch Saturday from 10 to noon. I won't be home." That's it. Nothing left to argue with.
JADE: don't Justify, Argue, Defend, or Explain. This one comes from survivor communities, not a clinic, and it may save you more energy than anything else here. Every explanation you give him is something new to argue with. You don't owe him reasons. "No." "I'm not discussing that." "That doesn't work for me." Then stop talking.
Broken record. Pick one short, calm sentence and repeat it, word for word, no matter what he says: "I'm not going to discuss this." He'll push, twist, and change the subject. You keep saying the same sentence. The technique comes from psychologist Manuel J. Smith's assertiveness classic, When I Say No, I Feel Guilty (1975). It works because there's nothing new for him to grab.
DEAR MAN, for safe people. Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), developed by psychologist Marsha Linehan, teaches a script for asking for what you need or saying no: Describe the facts, Express how you feel, Assert what you want, Reinforce why it helps them too, stay Mindful of your goal, Appear confident, and Negotiate where you can (Linehan, DBT Skills Training Manual, 2015). Use it with family, friends, coworkers, landlords, and lawyers. Don't use it with an abuser. Negotiating with him only gives him more to work with. With him, it's gray rock, BIFF, and JADE.
No-contact tools. Block his number and accounts. If you can't block him because of kids or legal matters, mute him, filter his emails into a folder, and ask a trusted friend to read them for anything you actually need to act on. Decide in advance what you'll say if he shows up or calls: one sentence, then stop.
The no-contact detox. Leaving a trauma bond is a lot like quitting an addiction, so treat it like one. Cold turkey works best. Every "just checking in" text is a relapse that resets the craving. If he's dangerous, plan this with an advocate first, because cutting contact can trigger escalation.
Before you start: - Block his number, email, and every social media account, including his backups and the ones you know about but aren't supposed to. - Mute or unfollow his friends and family if seeing their posts pulls you back. - Box up the photos, gifts, and anything that smells like him, and put it somewhere you won't see it, or give it to a friend to hold. - Delete the playlists. Change the restaurants. Take a different route home. - Tell two or three people what you're doing and ask them to be your emergency call when the craving hits.
The first days and weeks: - Expect withdrawal. You may feel panicky, sick, obsessive, sleepless, or flooded with memories of the good times. That's your brain chemistry recalibrating, not proof that you made a mistake. - When the urge to contact him hits, wait at least twenty minutes. Relationship researcher John Gottman found that when people are emotionally flooded, it takes roughly twenty minutes for the body to calm back down to baseline. That's an estimate, and it can take much longer for some of us, but it's a good rule: never act on a craving or a fight while you're flooded. Read your reasons list. Call someone from your list. Go outside. The craving rises like a wave, and then it falls (see urge surfing, below). - Expect hoovering: sweet messages, sudden crises, apologies, threats, friends sent to plead his case. Don't respond. Silence is a complete answer. - Don't check his social media. Every look is a small dose that keeps the addiction alive.
Give it time: Your brain chemistry needs time to settle. The stress hormones, the dopamine cravings, and the oxytocin bond don't switch off the day you leave. They fade gradually with distance and no contact, often over months, not days. Many survivors find the first ninety days the hardest. That's not a scientific deadline, just a common experience. Give yourself enough time before you judge how you feel, and long before you consider any contact.
The first months: - Let yourself grieve, not just him, but the future you hoped for, the time you lost, and the person you were before. - Fill the space he left with things that feed you: friends, movement, sleep, hobbies, your "remember you" list. - Get support: a trauma-informed therapist, a support group, CoDA, or Prodependence Anonymous. - If you slip and contact him, don't spiral into shame. Write down what triggered it, block him again, and restart the count. Recovery isn't a straight line.
If no contact isn't possible because of kids, court, or shared property, use gray rock and BIFF replies, keep everything in writing, and let an attorney or advocate handle as much as you can.
The words vs. actions log. Draw a line down a page. On the left, write what he said or promised, with the date. On the right, write what he actually did. After a few weeks, read only the right-hand column. That's who he is.
The "remember you" list. Write down everything you love or used to love: hobbies, places, music, food, friends, the things that make you feel most like yourself. Put a check next to anything you've given up. Pick one checked item and do it this week. Then another next week.
The reasons list. Write down every reason you left, specifically and with dates. Read it when you miss him, when he's charming again, and when the trauma bond tells you it wasn't that bad. Psychologist Ramani Durvasula recommends keeping exactly this kind of list (It's Not You, 2024).
Why I Stayed / Why I Left. In 2014, survivor Beverly Gooden started the hashtag #WhyIStayed, and within two days it was used more than 100,000 times as women explained, in their own words, what kept them there. Soon a second hashtag followed: #WhyILeft (DomesticShelters.org). Do your own version. Draw two columns. On the left, write every honest reason you stayed: fear, money, the kids, hope, shame, love, the good days. On the right, write every reason you left or need to. Seeing both on paper takes the story out of your head, where he can still argue with it, and puts it in front of you, where you can see it clearly.
Documentation. Keep a dated log of every incident. Photograph injuries and damage. Screenshot texts. Save everything somewhere he can't reach, like a new email account or a trusted friend's phone. If you see a doctor, tell them what happened so it goes in your record.
Tech safety. About 80% of stalking victims are stalked with technology. Of those, 66% get unwanted calls or messages, 32% are monitored through social media, 22% are spied on with technology, and 14% are tracked with a device or app (Bureau of Justice Statistics data, via SPARC). Check your phone for location sharing you didn't set up. Pay attention to alerts about unknown Bluetooth trackers, and check your car and bags. Change your passwords, turn on two-factor authentication, and consider a new email address he doesn't know. If you suspect spyware, talk to an advocate before removing it, because removing it can tip him off.
Home security. A monitored alarm system and cameras outside and inside your home do two jobs. They protect you, and they create a record. Footage of him showing up after you've told him to stay away is exactly the kind of evidence that supports an order of protection. Check your state's laws before recording audio, since the rules differ, and keep copies of footage somewhere he can't access.
The myPlan app. Researchers at Johns Hopkins University, led by Nancy Glass, built myPlan as the first decision aid designed specifically for abuse. It asks about your relationship, your safety priorities, and how severe the violence is, then creates a safety plan tailored to you (Glass et al.). In a randomized trial with college women, those who used it saw reductions in some forms of partner violence and improvements in mental health (Glass et al., 2022, Journal of Interpersonal Violence). It's free at myplanapp.org. Use it only on a phone and account he can't access.
Safe rooms and code words. If things are escalating, move to a room with a way out and nothing that can be used as a weapon. Kitchens, garages, and bathrooms are the worst places to be. I learned that cornered in my own garage, next to his tools. Set up a code word with friends, family, or your kids that means "call for help" or "get out now."
Grounding. When your body floods with panic, bring yourself back to the present: name five things you can see, four you can hear, three you can touch, two you can smell, and one you can taste. Breathe out longer than you breathe in. Your nervous system has been on high alert for a long time, so be patient with it.
Know your window of tolerance. Psychiatrist Dan Siegel describes a zone where you can feel your feelings and still think clearly (Siegel, The Developing Mind, 1999). Above it, you're in fight or flight: racing heart, panic, rage. Below it, you're in freeze: numb, foggy, shut down. Years of abuse shrink that window, so small things push you out of it. Every tool below is a way to get back inside, and over time, to make the window wider.
TIPP, for when you're flooded. DBT's fastest skills for an overwhelmed body (Linehan, 2015):
- Temperature: cold water on your face, or an ice pack on your eyes and cheeks, triggers the dive reflex and slows your heart.
- Intense exercise: a few minutes of hard movement burns off the adrenaline. Run the stairs, do jumping jacks.
- Paced breathing: breathe out longer than you breathe in.
- Paired muscle relaxation: tense a muscle group as you breathe in, then let it go as you breathe out.
STOP, before you react. Another DBT skill, for the moment he's baiting you: Stop, don't move or speak. Take a step back, physically or in your mind. Observe what's happening, inside you and around you. Proceed mindfully, choosing what you'll do instead of reacting. This is how you protect yourself from the defensive reactive abuse he's trying to provoke (Chapter 24).
HALT. Before you answer his text, make a big decision, or go back, ask yourself: am I Hungry, Angry, Lonely, or Tired? Recovery communities have used this check for decades. If the answer is yes, take care of that first, and decide later.
Urge surfing. When the craving to contact him hits, don't fight it and don't obey it. Notice where you feel it in your body, and watch it rise, peak, and fall, like a wave you're riding. Psychologist G. Alan Marlatt developed urge surfing for addiction relapse prevention, and a trauma bond behaves like an addiction. Pair it with the twenty-minute rule in the no-contact detox above.
Thought records. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), pioneered by psychiatrist Aaron Beck and made popular by psychiatrist David Burns in Feeling Good (1980), teaches you to catch a painful thought and test it. Write down the thought (It was my fault he exploded). List the evidence for it and the evidence against it. Then write a more balanced version (I asked a reasonable question. He chose to explode). It's one of the best tools there is for the self-blame in Chapter 8.
Radical acceptance. In DBT, radical acceptance means fully accepting reality as it is, including what you can't change, so you can stop fighting it. Accepting that he is who he has shown you he is doesn't mean approving of it. It means you stop spending your life waiting for a different man to appear. If you're stuck on his potential (Chapter 18), this is the skill.
The self-compassion break. Psychologist Kristin Neff, who pioneered the research on self-compassion, teaches three short steps for a hard moment: This is a moment of suffering. Suffering is part of life; I'm not alone. May I be kind to myself. Hand on your heart if it helps (self-compassion.org). It's an antidote to the inner critic that learned to blame you.
A self-soothe kit. DBT teaches soothing yourself through the five senses. Build a kit before you need it: a scent you love, something soft to hold, a song that calms you, a tea or a mint, a photo of a place that brings you peace. When the night gets bad, open the box.
A daily practice for dysregulation. Anna Runkle, who writes and teaches as the Crappy Childhood Fairy, is a survivor of childhood trauma, not a clinician, but her approach has helped many people whose nervous systems never learned to settle. After years of talk therapy that didn't calm her, she built a short daily routine: write down fearful or resentful thoughts by hand, let them go, then meditate for a few minutes (Runkle, Re-Regulated). It's simple, it's free, and it pairs well with professional care.
Glimmers. Therapist Deb Dana, who applies polyvagal theory (a model of how the nervous system shifts between feeling safe and feeling threatened) to everyday life, coined glimmers as the opposite of triggers, small moments that tell your nervous system you're safe. Sun on your face, a dog's head on your lap, a friend's laugh. Notice them on purpose. They add up.
The Wheels and the Cycle of Abuse
Four wheels and two cycles helped me finally see the shape of what happened to me. The first is a classic, filled in with examples from my own life so you can do the same with yours.
The Power and Control Wheel. Survivors in Duluth, Minnesota, created this wheel in 1984 by describing what their partners did to them. Power and control sit at the center, eight tactics form the spokes, and physical and sexual violence hold it all together at the rim. You can download the official wheels free from The Duluth Model. Notice what sits at the center. It isn't anger, and it isn't stress. It's power and control. He doesn't care how much harm he causes. He cares about keeping control of you and access to you. That's the entitlement at the heart of every spoke.
The Power and Control Wheel
Here's what each spoke means, with the kinds of things it can look like.
| Spoke | What it means | What it can look like |
|---|---|---|
| Coercion and threats | Making you afraid of what he'll do if you don't go along | Threatening to hurt you, leave you, take the kids, kill himself, or report you; making you drop charges or do illegal things |
| Intimidation | Scaring you without saying a word, or with very few | Looks, gestures, smashing or throwing things, punching walls, hurting pets, showing weapons |
| Emotional abuse | Wearing down how you see yourself | Misogynistic name-calling like "crazy," "psycho," "jealous," and "insecure"; humiliating you; making you think you're losing your mind |
| Isolation | Controlling who you see, where you go, and what you hear | Cutting you off from friends and family, monitoring you, smearing you so people pull away, using jealousy to justify it |
| Minimizing, denying, and blaming | Making the abuse seem small, or your fault | "It wasn't that bad." "That never happened." "You made me do it." |
| Using children | Turning the kids into a tool against you | Making you feel guilty about them, using visits to harass you, threatening to take them, turning them against you |
| Economic abuse | Controlling the money so you can't leave | Taking your money, running up your credit, keeping you from working, refusing to pay his share, living off you |
| Male privilege | Acting like the man of the house is the boss of you | Treating you like a servant, making every big decision, defining a woman's role, sexist name-calling like calling a capable woman "bossy" |
Adapted from the Domestic Abuse Intervention Programs' Power and Control Wheel (The Duluth Model), with examples in my own words.
The Covert Control Wheel. Not every tactic leaves a bruise. These are the quiet ones that kept me confused and doubting myself. The rim is what gives them power. I already knew what he was capable of.
The Covert Control Wheel
The Survival Wheel. This is what I did to get through it. None of these are flaws. They're survival strategies that made sense under threat, and naming them is the first step to choosing differently.
The Survival Wheel
The idea of mapping covert abuse and a survivor's responses as wheels has been popularized online by Kate Gray, LMFT (Codependency Kate). The categories and examples on these two wheels are my own.
The Cycle of Abuse. This is the blow-up and the reset. Tension builds, and you walk on eggshells. Then comes the blow-up, which can be emotional, verbal, sexual, or physical. Then the reset: the apologies, gifts, and promises, often a return of the love bombing from the beginning, or else blame, denial, and acting as if nothing happened. Then a calm that feels like it's over, until the tension starts building again. Psychologist Lenore Walker described this cycle in her 1979 book The Battered Woman, based on interviews with battered women. Later researchers found that not every relationship follows it, and the apology stage can fade as abuse gets worse. Over time it speeds up, and the calm gets shorter. One caution. Abuse can also come out of nowhere, outside any cycle (Walker, 1979).
To map your own, think back over the last few blow-ups. For each one, write what the tension looked like before it, what set it off, how he reset things afterward, and how long the calm lasted. If the calm keeps getting shorter, or the reset has stopped coming at all, take that seriously. It means the abuse is escalating (Chapter 27).
The Cycle of Abuse
The Cycle of Trauma. The Cycle of Abuse explains what happens inside one relationship. This cycle explains why it keeps happening across relationships. It's my own model, built from my life and the research in Part II. It starts with a childhood wound: abuse, neglect, or no attunement. A child adapts with survival skills like hypervigilance, fawning, and over-functioning. As an adult, the familiar feels like love, so the man who fits those wounds feels like chemistry, and the kind, steady man feels boring. Then the new abuse confirms the old beliefs: I'm only lovable if I'm useful. Love hurts. It's my job to fix it. And the cycle starts again. Seeing it is how you break it.
The Cycle of Trauma
The Equality Wheel. The same Duluth project that created the Power and Control Wheel also created an Equality Wheel, a picture of what a healthy relationship looks like. After three wheels about abuse and surviving it, here's what love does. Use it as your standard.
The Equality Wheel
The Psychopathy Checklist
Psychologist Robert Hare's checklist (the PCL-R) is scored by trained clinicians, so you can't diagnose anyone with it. But reading the list was a turning point for me. In my experience, the first eight items are the ones you'll notice first while dating. The twenty items below are Hare's (Hare, The Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised, 2nd ed., 2003; item list via PMC).
| # | Trait | # | Trait |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Glibness / superficial charm | 11 | Promiscuous sexual behavior |
| 2 | Grandiose sense of self-worth | 12 | Early behavioral problems |
| 3 | Need for stimulation | 13 | No realistic long-term goals |
| 4 | Pathological lying | 14 | Impulsivity |
| 5 | Conning / manipulative | 15 | Irresponsibility |
| 6 | Lack of remorse or guilt | 16 | Failure to accept responsibility |
| 7 | Shallow affect | 17 | Many short-term marital relationships |
| 8 | Callous / lack of empathy | 18 | Juvenile delinquency |
| 9 | Parasitic lifestyle | 19 | Revocation of conditional release |
| 10 | Poor behavioral controls | 20 | Criminal versatility |
The Danger Assessment
Twenty yes-or-no questions plus a calendar where you mark each incident and how bad it was. Filling in that calendar often shows women the abuse is worse than they thought. It's free at dangerassessment.org, and it's best done with an advocate who is certified to score it.
Where to Talk
The most important tool in this book is telling one person. Isolation is how abuse stays hidden, and connection is how it ends. If you want to keep learning, every expert, book, and podcast mentioned in these pages is listed in Sources, at the very end.
Talk to an advocate
- RAINN, National Sexual Assault Hotline: 1-800-656-4673, or chat online. Free, confidential, 24/7.
- National Domestic Violence Hotline: 1-800-799-7233, text START to 88788, or live chat. They can also help you find local survivor groups.
- loveisrespect (dating abuse): 1-866-331-9474, or text LOVEIS to 22522.
- 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline: call or text 988, or chat online. Free, confidential, 24/7.
- SAMHSA National Helpline: 1-800-662-4357. Free, confidential, 24/7 help with mental health, drug, and alcohol concerns, for you or for someone you love.
- Office on Violence Against Women (OVW): the U.S. Department of Justice's list of hotlines and resources for survivors of domestic violence, sexual assault, dating violence, and stalking.
- Stalking Prevention, Awareness, and Resource Center (SPARC): information on stalking, documentation logs, and safety planning.
- Your local domestic violence agency: most have a 24-hour crisis line, safety planning, counseling, and lethality checklists. Search for the one in your county.
Find your people
- Co-Dependents Anonymous (CoDA): online meetings around the clock by Zoom or phone, and in-person meetings by ZIP code.
- Prodependence Anonymous: attachment-based 12-step groups; check the meeting list for options, including any women-only meetings.
- Betrayed Partners Drop-In: free weekly virtual groups for partners dealing with betrayal and sexual deception.
- Baggage Reclaim: writer Natalie Lue's long-running articles and podcast on people-pleasing, boundaries, and breaking unhealthy relationship patterns.
- NAMI Support Groups: free peer-led groups, virtual and local.
Therapies to ask about
You don't need to know which therapy you need. A good trauma therapist will help you figure it out. But it helps to know the names.
- Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT): skills for emotional flooding, reactivity, and distress, developed by Marsha Linehan.
- Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT): changing the thought patterns that keep you stuck, from Aaron Beck's work.
- Cognitive processing therapy (CPT): a trauma-focused form of CBT developed by Patricia Resick, the therapy used in the study in Chapter 35.
- EMDR (eye movement desensitization and reprocessing): for processing trauma memories, developed by Francine Shapiro.
- Internal Family Systems (IFS): working with the different "parts" of you, including the part that still defends him, developed by Richard Schwartz.
- Somatic Experiencing: releasing trauma held in the body, developed by Peter Levine.
- Schema therapy: for lifelong patterns like I have to earn love or I'll be abandoned, developed by Jeffrey Young.
When you call, ask: "Do you have training in trauma and in domestic abuse?" If the answer is vague, keep looking. And if you're still with him, avoid couples counseling (Chapter 21).
Reach out safely
Use a phone or computer he can't access, since devices can be monitored and history is hard to fully erase. Use private browsing and quick-exit buttons. Online meetings let you connect even when leaving the house isn't safe.
What to say
To a friend: "Something is going on in my relationship, and I need to tell someone." To an advocate: "I'm not sure if this is abuse. Can I describe what's happening?" If the first person doesn't believe you, tell someone else. Keep telling until someone does.
Check in on your people
The women in your life may be hiding it the way I hid it. Watch for the signs that someone is being abused (National Domestic Violence Hotline):
- She makes excuses for her partner's behavior.
- She seems afraid of him, or anxious about getting home on time.
- She's pulled away from friends and family, or he's always with her.
- She's lost interest in things she used to love.
- Her sleeping, eating, drinking, or drug use has changed.
- She's lost her confidence, or seems depressed.
- She has injuries she explains away, or she's suddenly wearing long sleeves in summer.
If you notice these, don't wait for her to bring it up. Reach out privately, when he isn't around: "I've been thinking about you. How are things at home, really?" Tell her what you've noticed without judging him or her. Let her know you're there no matter what she decides. And keep checking in. One question may not open the door, but it lets her know the door is there.
If you're the friend
Believe her, and don't make her defend his good side. Tell her what a good person she is. And stay in her life even if she goes back. Leaving often takes more than one try, and she'll need you when she's ready.
Sources
- Victim selection: Wheeler, Book and Costello (2009); Book, Costello and Camilleri (2013); Martha Stout, The Sociopath Next Door
- Revictimization: Bellot, Muñoz-Rivas, Botella and Montorio (2024), Behavioral Sciences 14(2):103
- Stress, trauma, and autoimmune disease: Dube et al. (2009), "Cumulative childhood stress and autoimmune diseases in adults," Psychosomatic Medicine 71(2); Song et al. (2018), "Association of stress-related disorders with subsequent autoimmune disease," JAMA 319(23)
- Loneliness: Office of the U.S. Surgeon General, Our Epidemic of Loneliness and Isolation (2023)
- Resilience and one supportive adult: National Scientific Council on the Developing Child, Harvard University
- PTSD treatment and later partner violence: Iverson et al. (2011), Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 79(2):193–202
- Separation and femicide risk: Wilson and Daly (1993), "Spousal homicide risk and estrangement," Violence and Victims; Campbell et al. (2003), American Journal of Public Health; Jacquelyn Campbell, Johns Hopkins Danger Assessment research (dangerassessment.org)
- Financial abuse prevalence: National Network to End Domestic Violence
- Boundaries: University of Edinburgh Student Counselling, "What Are Boundaries?"; love is respect, "Creating Boundaries in Romantic Relationships"; Hailey Magee, "Requests vs. Boundaries vs. Ultimatums," Gottman Institute; Psych Central, "Why Ultimatums Are Destructive to Your Relationship"; Simply Psychology, relationship boundaries guide
- Religion and partner violence: Lee E. Ross (2014), "Religion and intimate partner violence: A double-edge sword," in Continuing the War Against Domestic Violence, CRC Press
- Pastors and domestic violence: LifeWay Research survey of 1,000 Protestant senior pastors (2014), sponsored by Sojourners and IMA World Health
- Abuse in independent fundamental Baptist churches: Sarah Smith, Fort Worth Star-Telegram (December 2018)
- Suicidal behavior among abused women: Cavanaugh, Messing, Del-Colle, O'Sullivan and Campbell (2011), "Prevalence and correlates of suicidal behavior among adult female victims of intimate partner violence," Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior 41(4)
- Coercive control: Evan Stark; Women's Aid; Barlow, Johnson, Walklate and Humphreys, Lancaster University and Merseyside Police; Kristy Kassing and Anthony Collins (2025), "'Slowly, Over Time, You Completely Lose Yourself,'" Journal of Interpersonal Violence 41(3-4), doi:10.1177/08862605251320998; Lohmann et al. (2024); Jess Hill, See What You Made Me Do (2019); Laura Richards, DASH risk model
- Imago and family of origin: Harville Hendrix, Getting the Love You Want
- Self-assessments: ECR-R (Fraley, Waller and Brennan); ACE questionnaire (CDC-Kaiser); International Trauma Questionnaire (Cloitre et al.)
- Adult attachment styles: Amir Levine and Rachel Heller, Attached (2010)
- Attunement: Dan Siegel; Edward Tronick's Still Face experiment
- Highly sensitive person: Elaine Aron, The Highly Sensitive Person (1996)
- Nonviolent communication: Marshall B. Rosenberg, Nonviolent Communication: A Language of Life
- Attachment: Mary Main and Erik Hesse; Ronald Fairbairn's moral defense
- Trauma and the body: the CDC-Kaiser ACE studies; Swedish cohort study, JAMA (2018); Bessel van der Kolk
- Love and the brain: Helen Fisher et al., "Reward, addiction, and emotion regulation systems associated with rejection in love" (2010)
- Pathological lying and the brain: Yang, Raine et al. (2005), "Prefrontal white matter in pathological liars," British Journal of Psychiatry
- Diagnoses and abuse: DSM-5 criteria for antisocial personality disorder; Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart (1994) batterer typology
- Accepting influence (including the 81% figure), the Four Horsemen, and repair attempts: John Gottman, The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work; Gottman Institute, "Managing Conflict: Accepting Influence"
- DARVO: Jennifer Freyd, University of Oregon
- Pre-incident indicators: Gavin de Becker, The Gift of Fear (1997); covert contracts: Robert Glover, No More Mr. Nice Guy
- Victims' rights and policing: Marsy's Law coverage (Stateline); United States v. Rahimi (2024)
- Status mismatch and partner violence: Bjelland (Norway), as reported by Kilden; van Vugt and Pop (2022); Peru decision-making study (PMC)
- Abuse in institutions: Guidepost Solutions investigation of the Southern Baptist Convention (2022)
- Local help and financial safety: National Domestic Violence Hotline; DomesticShelters.org; WomensLaw.org; 211; AnnualCreditReport.com (free weekly reports from all three bureaus, made permanent in 2023); The Allstate Foundation, Moving Ahead curriculum; FreeFrom
- Gray rock and BIFF: Bill Eddy, High Conflict Institute; DomesticShelters.org
- Go-bag and safety planning: National Domestic Violence Hotline; state and local agency checklists
- Power and Control Wheel and Equality Wheel: Domestic Abuse Intervention Project, Duluth
- Global prevalence: World Health Organization, "Violence Against Women" fact sheet, 2023 estimates (published 2025)
- Femicide (including regional shares for the Americas and Europe): UNODC and UN Women, Femicides in 2024: Global Estimates of Intimate Partner/Family Member Femicides (2025), and earlier global femicide reports (2024)
- Accepting influence and marital stability: Gottman, Coan, Carrère and Swanson (1998), "Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions," Journal of Marriage and the Family
- Traumatic bonding: Dutton and Painter (1981), Victimology
- Protection orders: Holt, Kernic, Lumley, Wolf and Rivara (2002), JAMA
- Coercive control law: Serious Crime Act 2015, section 76 (England and Wales)
- Police family violence: Johnson (1991); Neidig, Russell and Seng (1992); National Center for Women & Policing, Police Family Violence Fact Sheet
- Biderman's Chart of Coercion: Biderman (1957), Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine; Amnesty International, Report on Torture (1973); DomesticShelters.org adaptation for domestic violence
- Testing, hoovering, and recovery: Ramani Durvasula, Should I Stay or Should I Go? (2015) and It's Not You (2024)
- Minnesota femicide data: Minnesota Coalition for Battered Women, femicide reports
- Signs of infidelity: Caroline Madden, LMFT, via Bustle; Danine Manette, Ultimate Betrayal
- Tone policing: Haverford College, Institutional Diversity, Equity and Access
- Defensive reactive abuse and terminology: Ashley Laderer, Insider (2022), quoting Debra Wingfield, LPC
- Steroids and violence: van de Ven, Malouff and McVeigh (2024), Trauma, Violence, & Abuse; Ganson, Jackson, Testa and Nagata (2022), Journal of Interpersonal Violence
- Sex differences in strength: Miller, MacDougall, Tarnopolsky and Sale (1993), European Journal of Applied Physiology
- Family roles: Sharon Wegscheider-Cruse, Another Chance: Hope and Health for the Alcoholic Family (1981)
- Why women stay: Megan Stubbs-Richardson, Mississippi State University
- The leaving process: Khaw and Hardesty (2007), Family Relations; Baholo (2012), University of the Witwatersrand; Patton (2003), Pathways: How Women Leave Violent Men
- #WhyIStayed: Beverly Gooden (2014)
- Trauma bonding measurement: Graham, Rawlings, Ihms et al. (1995), "A scale for identifying 'Stockholm syndrome' reactions in young dating women," Violence and Victims 10(1); Patrick Carnes, The Betrayal Bond (1997)
- myPlan safety app: Glass et al. (2015, 2022), Johns Hopkins University
- Fawn response and emotional flashbacks: Pete Walker, Complex PTSD: From Surviving to Thriving (2013)
- Abusive men and abandonment fear: Donald G. Dutton, The Abusive Personality: Violence and Control in Intimate Relationships
- Cognitive dissonance: Leon Festinger, A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (1957)
- Stress and the prefrontal cortex: Amy Arnsten (2009), "Stress signalling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function," Nature Reviews Neuroscience
- Brain injury in partner violence: Raskin et al. (2023), The Clinical Neuropsychologist; Makovec Knight et al. (2025), Journal of Neurotrauma
- First impressions and narcissism: Back, Schmukle and Egloff (2010), Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 98(1)
- Persistence of partner violence across relationships: Whitaker, Le and Niolon (2010), Journal of Interpersonal Violence 25(4)
- Emotional contagion: Hatfield, Cacioppo and Rapson, Emotional Contagion (1994)
- Cycle of abuse and battered woman syndrome: Lenore Walker, The Battered Woman (1979) and The Battered Woman Syndrome
- Parent-child dynamic and partner burnout: Melissa Orlov
- Men's friendships: Survey Center on American Life, American Perspectives Survey (2021)
- Singles and dating: Pew Research Center, "A Profile of Single Americans" (2020)
- Housework in egalitarian marriages: Pew Research Center (2023)
- Cognitive labor: Allison Daminger (2019), American Sociological Review
- Recovery after leaving: Anderson and Saunders (2003), "Leaving an abusive partner," Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
- Post-traumatic growth: Tedeschi and Calhoun (1996), Journal of Traumatic Stress
- Loneliness: U.S. Surgeon General, Our Epidemic of Loneliness and Isolation (2023)
- Negging: Merriam-Webster; Refinery29
- Micro-cheating: Melanie Schilling, as reported by NBC News
- Male sexual proprietariness: Wilson and Daly (1993), Violence and Victims; Wilson and Daly (1996), Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Post-separation coercive control: Tutty, Radtke and Nixon (2023), Violence Against Women
- Leaving and recurrent abuse: Sonis and Langer (2008), Journal of Family Violence
- The human magnet syndrome and self- and other-orientation: Ross Rosenberg, The Human Magnet Syndrome: The Codependent Narcissist Trap
- Strangulation injuries: Strack, McClane and Hawley (2001), Journal of Emergency Medicine; Glass et al. (2008), Journal of Emergency Medicine, on strangulation and homicide risk
- Coercive control in family law: Colorado HB26-1309 (2026)
- Childhood emotional neglect: Jonice Webb, Running on Empty (2012)
- Family scapegoating: Rebecca C. Mandeville, Rejected, Shamed, and Blamed (2020)
- Mothers who need mothering: Susan Forward, Mothers Who Can't Love (2013)
- Starting with a basic boundary or a simple no: Thais Gibson, The Personal Development School
- Parentification and the healing fantasy: Lindsay C. Gibson, Adult Children of Emotionally Immature Parents (2015) and Disentangling from Emotionally Immature People (2023)
- Grief and the gifted child: Alice Miller, The Drama of the Gifted Child
- Family systems and "change back": Harriet Lerner, The Dance of Anger
- Estrangement as a process: Kristina Scharp, The Conversation (2021)
- Yoga and PTSD: van der Kolk et al. (2014), "Yoga as an adjunctive treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder," Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 75(6); Bessel van der Kolk, The Body Keeps the Score (2014)
- Children's exposure to family violence: Hamby, Finkelhor, Turner and Ormrod (2011), OJJDP bulletin
- PTSD in young children exposed to partner violence: Levendosky, Bogat and Martinez-Torteya (2013), Violence Against Women 19(2)
- Overlap of partner abuse and child maltreatment: National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges
- Childhood family violence and adult victimization: Whitfield, Anda, Dube and Felitti (2003), Journal of Interpersonal Violence
- Strangulation felony laws: WCPO (2023)
- Assertiveness and broken record: Manuel J. Smith, When I Say No, I Feel Guilty (1975)
- DBT skills (DEAR MAN, TIPP, STOP, radical acceptance, self-soothe): Marsha M. Linehan, DBT Skills Training Manual, 2nd ed. (2015)
- Window of tolerance: Daniel J. Siegel, The Developing Mind (1999)
- Urge surfing: G. Alan Marlatt and Judith Gordon, Relapse Prevention (1985)
- Cognitive therapy and thought records: Aaron T. Beck; David D. Burns, Feeling Good (1980)
- Self-compassion: Kristin Neff, self-compassion.org
- Glimmers: Deb Dana, Anchored (2021)
- Therapies: Patricia Resick (CPT); Francine Shapiro (EMDR); Richard Schwartz (IFS); Peter Levine (Somatic Experiencing); Jeffrey Young (schema therapy)
- Stalking prevalence: CDC, NISVS 2016/2017 Report on Stalking (2022)
- Stalking and femicide: McFarlane, Campbell, Wilt, Sachs, Ulrich and Xu (1999), "Stalking and intimate partner femicide," Homicide Studies 3(4)
- Stalking by intimate partners and documentation logs: Stalking Prevention, Awareness, and Resource Center (SPARC)
- Men's and women's muscle mass and upper-body strength: William Lassek and Steven Gaulin (2009), "Costs and benefits of fat-free muscle mass in men," Evolution and Human Behavior 30(5); Takashi Abe, Charles Kearns and Tetsuo Fukunaga (2003), British Journal of Sports Medicine 37(5); both as summarized in Durkee et al. (2019), Evolutionary Psychology
- Stalking, technology, and victims' fears: SPARC, Stalking and Technology fact sheet, drawing on Morgan and Truman (2022), Bureau of Justice Statistics
- Forced sex as a homicide risk factor, and sexual assault in battering relationships: Jacquelyn Campbell et al. (2003), "Assessing Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Homicide," NIJ Journal 250
- Rapes committed by someone the victim knows: RAINN
- Reporting rape and sexual assault to police: Rachel Morgan and Erica Smith (2024), Criminal Victimization, 2023, Bureau of Justice Statistics
- Stalking with physical and sexual assault: Patricia Tjaden and Nancy Thoennes (1998), Stalking in America, National Institute of Justice
- Stalking and firearms: SPARC, Stalking and Firearms fact sheet; Spencer and Stith (2018), Trauma, Violence, & Abuse; Logan and Lynch (2018), Violence and Victims; Rai et al. (2020), Journal of Family Violence; Logan and Landhuis (2022), Behavioral Sciences & the Law
- Stalking reporting and fear: Morgan and Truman (2022), Stalking Victimization, 2019, Bureau of Justice Statistics
- Abusive men in their own words: Deeyah Khan, dir., Behind the Rage: America's Domestic Violence (Fuuse Film for ITV Exposure, 2022; distributed in the U.S. by Women Make Movies)
- Claimed amnesia after violent crime: Marko Jelicic (2018), "Testing Claims of Crime-Related Amnesia," Frontiers in Psychiatry 9:617
- Pupil dilation and the sympathetic nervous system: iris dilator muscle, standard physiology
- Stalking and coercive control as slow-motion homicide: Laura Richards, criminal behavioral analyst, on Elizabeth Vargas Reports (NewsNation)
- Complex PTSD: Judith Herman, Trauma and Recovery (1992)
- Relationship patterns and people-pleasing: Natalie Lue, Baggage Reclaim
- Projection: Schimel, Greenberg and Martens (2003), "Evidence that projection of a feared trait can serve a defensive function," Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29(8)
- Oxytocin after sex: Denes et al. (2025), Archives of Sexual Behavior
- Sleep deprivation as abuse: DomesticShelters.org
- Over- and under-functioning: Murray Bowen, family systems theory; Harriet Lerner, The Dance of Intimacy (1989)
- Homicide timeline: Jane Monckton Smith (2020), "Intimate partner femicide: Using Foucauldian analysis to track an eight stage progression to homicide," Violence Against Women; In Control (2021)
- Strangulation and unseen injuries: Rachel Louise Snyder, No Visible Bruises (2019)
- Spousal rape laws: Boston Globe (2019); RAINN
- Traumatic cognitive dissonance: Peter Salerno, Traumatic Cognitive Dissonance: Healing From an Abusive Relationship With a Disordered Personality
- Survival strategies and complex trauma: Tim Fletcher, RE/ACT
- Dysregulation and daily practice: Anna Runkle, Re-Regulated
- Perpetrator programs and measures of change: Liz Kelly and Nicole Westmarland, Project Mirabal (2015)
- Leaving and returning: Griffing, Ragin, Sage, Madry, Bingham and Primm (2002), "Domestic violence survivors' self-identified reasons for returning to abusive relationships," Journal of Interpersonal Violence 17(3)
- Drugging as abuse: DomesticShelters.org; Lisa Aronson Fontes, Invisible Chains and Psychology Today (2021)
- Forensic exams without reporting: National Institute of Justice, Sexual Assault Medical Forensic Exams and VAWA 2005 Payment Practices
- Moving and partner violence risk: Waltermaurer, McNutt and Mattingly (2006), "Examining the effect of residential change on intimate partner violence risk," Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 60(11)
- Romance scams and vulnerability: Homeland Security Investigations
- Age and partner violence: Bureau of Justice Statistics, Intimate Partner Violence, 1993–2010
- Pregnancy-associated homicide: Wallace, Gillispie-Bell, Cruz, Davis and Vilda (2021), Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Disability and partner violence: Breiding and Armour (2015), Annals of Epidemiology 25(6)
- Economic distress and partner violence: National Institute of Justice
- Numbing and reabuse: Krause, Kaltman, Goodman and Dutton (2006), Journal of Traumatic Stress 19(4)
- Emotion dysregulation and risk perception: Walsh, DiLillo and Messman-Moore (2012), Journal of Interpersonal Violence
- Sexual assault resistance program: Senn et al. (2015), "Efficacy of a sexual assault resistance program for university women," New England Journal of Medicine 372
- Psychopathy Checklist: Robert D. Hare, The Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (PCL-R), 2nd ed. (Multi-Health Systems, 2003); Robert D. Hare, Without Conscience (1993); item list via PMC
- Reverse-order recall and lie detection: Vrij, Mann, Fisher, Leal, Milne and Bull (2008), "Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: The benefit of recalling an event in reverse order," Law and Human Behavior 32(3)
- Warning signs: Hope Haven, "Indicators of Abuse"; National Domestic Violence Hotline, "Domestic Abuse Warning Signs"
- Man vs. Bear: Gray News via WFSB (May 2024); The Mary Sue
- Covert control and survival wheels: Kate Gray, LMFT (Codependency Kate)
- Separation and escalation: New South Wales domestic violence death review, via Illawarra Mercury and Canberra Times; Washington state data via West Seattle Herald
- U.S. coercive control laws: DomesticShelters.org, "USA Coercive Control Laws" (2022)
- Narcissistic supply: Otto Fenichel (1938)